HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 111-60RESOLUTION NO. 111-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL
PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS
"VERDE NO. 1", PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.-
WHIgtEAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of
Bakersfield on the 12th day of OctOber,-1960 requesting that certain
uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated
within the City of Bakersfield, and
WHEREAS, said pe'tition was signed. by the owners of not less
than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and
representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of
such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment
roll of the County of Kern.
NOW, THY-RBPORE, in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939,. Chapter 297,'as
amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield,
as follows:
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be.annexed
to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows:
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of
California~ and being a portion of Block "C" of "GREENE'S
TRACT" as per map of said "GREENE'S TRACT" recorded November
9, 1905, in Book 1 of Maps at page 9?, in the office of the
County Recorder of said Kern County:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 6 in said Block "C",
a point on the current corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield; thence (1) southerly along the easterly boundary
of said Lot 6, and along the corporate boundary of said City,
as same is defined by Ordinance No. 830 New Series, to inter-
sect a line parallel with, and distant 30 feet southerly as
measured perpendicular to the northerly boundary of said Lot 6;
th'ence (2) westerly along'said parallel line, departing from
'the corporate boundary. of said City, to intersect the westerly
'~boUndary-of said Lot'6; ~hen-ce"~3~--~O~'th~-fly a'ld~gl~Y'named
westerly boundary to the southeast Corner of Lot 4 in said
Block "C"; thence (4) westerly along the southerly boundary
of said Lot 4 to intersect the westerly boundary of the East
152 feet of the South half (S. 1/2), Of said Lot 4; thence
(5) northerly along last named westerly boundary to intersect
the southerly boundary of the North 154 fee~of the East 152
feet of the South half (S. 1/2), of said Lot 4; thence (6)
easterly along last named~southerlyboundary to .intersect
the westerly boundary of Lot 3 in said Block "C"; thence
(7) northerly along last named westerly :bDundary to inter-
sect the westerly extension of the southerly line of 2nd"
Street, as said 2rid Street is sh0~n on the. map'of the. Goode
Tract, recorded May 2, 1910, in Book.l'of Maps at page 141~,
in the office or the said COunty Recorder, said last named
intersection being a point on the corporate boundary of the
.City of Bakersfleld; thence (8) easterly along said last
named westerly extension and along said corporate boundary
as same is defined by that certain annexation designated as
'~South Bakersfield District No. 3" to intersect the westerly
boundary of the East half (E. 1/2) of said Lot 3; thence (9)
southerly along last named westerly boundary and along the
corporate boundary of said City as same is defined by Ordi-
nance No. 123~, New Series, to intersect the southerly
boundary of said Lot 3; thence (10) easterly along last
named.southerly boundary, and along the corporate boundary
of said City, as same iS defined by said Ordinance No. 1235,
New Series, and by Ordinance No. 917, New Series, to the
southeast corner of said Lot 3, Block "C" of "Greene,s
Tract" the point of beginning, containing 2°046 acres of
land more or less.
That a designation appropriately naming. such' territory is "VERDE N0.1"'.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that'Monday, the 14th day of November
1960,.at the hour of eight o'clock P..M., in the Council Chambers of
the City. Hall, lS01 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California,~ is the
time when and the olace where any person .owning real property within'
such territory So proposed to be annexed'and having any objections to
the proposed annexation may appear before the Council of the City of
Bakersfield, and show cause ~ty such .territory should not .be annexed.
-o0o ....... ·
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City .of Bakersfield, at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the 17th day of October , 1960, by the following
vote: ~
L~S: BALFANZ. etr''f~c['~. pa~Nr, KIS. COLLINS, CROES, DOOLIN, STIERN,
t'IOES:~, "~
O it r~ ' d 6 rk of the
an
Council of the City of Bakersfield.