Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 111-60RESOLUTION NO. 111-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "VERDE NO. 1", PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.- WHIgtEAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of Bakersfield on the 12th day of OctOber,-1960 requesting that certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated within the City of Bakersfield, and WHEREAS, said pe'tition was signed. by the owners of not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment roll of the County of Kern. NOW, THY-RBPORE, in compliance with the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939,. Chapter 297,'as amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, as follows: That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be.annexed to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows: A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California~ and being a portion of Block "C" of "GREENE'S TRACT" as per map of said "GREENE'S TRACT" recorded November 9, 1905, in Book 1 of Maps at page 9?, in the office of the County Recorder of said Kern County: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 6 in said Block "C", a point on the current corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; thence (1) southerly along the easterly boundary of said Lot 6, and along the corporate boundary of said City, as same is defined by Ordinance No. 830 New Series, to inter- sect a line parallel with, and distant 30 feet southerly as measured perpendicular to the northerly boundary of said Lot 6; th'ence (2) westerly along'said parallel line, departing from 'the corporate boundary. of said City, to intersect the westerly '~boUndary-of said Lot'6; ~hen-ce"~3~--~O~'th~-fly a'ld~gl~Y'named westerly boundary to the southeast Corner of Lot 4 in said Block "C"; thence (4) westerly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 4 to intersect the westerly boundary of the East 152 feet of the South half (S. 1/2), Of said Lot 4; thence (5) northerly along last named westerly boundary to intersect the southerly boundary of the North 154 fee~of the East 152 feet of the South half (S. 1/2), of said Lot 4; thence (6) easterly along last named~southerlyboundary to .intersect the westerly boundary of Lot 3 in said Block "C"; thence (7) northerly along last named westerly :bDundary to inter- sect the westerly extension of the southerly line of 2nd" Street, as said 2rid Street is sh0~n on the. map'of the. Goode Tract, recorded May 2, 1910, in Book.l'of Maps at page 141~, in the office or the said COunty Recorder, said last named intersection being a point on the corporate boundary of the .City of Bakersfleld; thence (8) easterly along said last named westerly extension and along said corporate boundary as same is defined by that certain annexation designated as '~South Bakersfield District No. 3" to intersect the westerly boundary of the East half (E. 1/2) of said Lot 3; thence (9) southerly along last named westerly boundary and along the corporate boundary of said City as same is defined by Ordi- nance No. 123~, New Series, to intersect the southerly boundary of said Lot 3; thence (10) easterly along last named.southerly boundary, and along the corporate boundary of said City, as same iS defined by said Ordinance No. 1235, New Series, and by Ordinance No. 917, New Series, to the southeast corner of said Lot 3, Block "C" of "Greene,s Tract" the point of beginning, containing 2°046 acres of land more or less. That a designation appropriately naming. such' territory is "VERDE N0.1"'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that'Monday, the 14th day of November 1960,.at the hour of eight o'clock P..M., in the Council Chambers of the City. Hall, lS01 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California,~ is the time when and the olace where any person .owning real property within' such territory So proposed to be annexed'and having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield, and show cause ~ty such .territory should not .be annexed. -o0o ....... · I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City .of Bakersfield, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of October , 1960, by the following vote: ~ L~S: BALFANZ. etr''f~c['~. pa~Nr, KIS. COLLINS, CROES, DOOLIN, STIERN, t'IOES:~, "~ O it r~ ' d 6 rk of the an Council of the City of Bakersfield.