HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 37-60 RESOLUTION NO.. 37-60
RES DLUTION ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY'
DESIGNATED AS "COLLEGE ·HEIGHTS NO. ·8"
TO THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD' SEPARATION
OF GRADE 'DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the Council .of ttie City of Bake~sfiel'd did~ on the
2i~t-day bf March, 1960, pass its ResOlUtion of intention No o- 25-60,
to include certain property designated as "~'College Heights
Vithin the .Greater'Bakersfield SeparatiOn'Of Grade District, and
'setting the 6ime and place for hearing 6bjec'tionS to, the inclusion
of said territory witbib said District~ and
'~'~ER~S, said Resolution of In~entfon was.dUly and legally
published once a week for two weeks, the first'.publication thereof
b'eing at least twenty days prior to 'the date of the' hearing as pro-
vided by 'law~ and
F~REAS, Monday, the 25th day'of. Apri.1, 1960, at the hour of
,8:00 o~clo~l~ 'P.M., was set as the.time fpr hearing:'objeCtions to the
inclusion 'of. said territory within" said District, '.and
'-]~R~S~ no object'ion has been' filed'6r presented to said
Council to 'the inclusion of said, '.territ0r~ 6r an~ part.~.thereof'.within
the Greater Bakersfield Separation '.of Grade District, and the COuncil
fur~h4r finds that all of said 6erritor,y will be benefited by its.
." inCl~xsionwithin said District. . ..... ~...
NOW, .T~R~ORE, BE IT RESOL~'D' AND THE 60UNOIL DOES . SRE~ FIND: '
"That' no objection to .the inclusion 'of said territory or' any
part' thereof Within the Greater 'Bakersfield Separation Of..Grade
DiStrict, has bsen filed or presented 'to..~hiS CoUncil...
That said territory and every .par-~. thereof' be, 'and the 'same
he~ebY aDnexed to and included.within t~e said Greater Bakersfield
Separation, of"G~ade District ~pon" completion 0f amexa~tio~ o.f said
terr{tory to the City of Bakersfield~ which.saidterritory'iS
described as follows:
A' parcel of land situate in the Count~of Kern~ :state
California, and being.a portion of the southeast quar~ter
(S. s.' 1/4)of Section 1~, Township 29 South, Range 28 East,
B~ginning at the southwest (S.~Wo) COrner o£ the northeast
quarter (N. E. 1/4), of~ the southeast q~arter (So Eo 1/4) of
said Section 15,~ a point on the current corporate boundary' of
the City' of Bakersfie. td; thence'N° 0°0~' 08" Wo, along the
westerly boundary of th~ northeast q~arte~ (N~ Eo 1/4), of
the~southeast~quarter (S. E. 1/4)~of said Section 15, On and
along~said corporate boundary as same is defi~ed by that~
certain annexation designated as' '~Colleg~ Heights No .
o ~ as
adopted February 24, 1958, by Ordinance Noo 1t70~ New
~nd which was certified March 26,' 19~8, byethe Secretary of
State., State of California, a distance o~ 149o127 feet, toga
point of intersection with a curVe~ and. from which the· radi&l
center:of~said curve bears N. 59' 49' 37'~ Eo~·'distant
feet; thence southeasterly and~depar~ting'from the~'corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfi~eId~.atong said"lcurVe concave to
~-Ithe northeast, with.a radius of 544o1~ ~eet,~.a. distance of 148o283-'
feet tona pointlo~ tangency, from w~ich the radial.center·of said
12' 49'E , .
curve bears N. 4~~ ~ . distant ~4~o1~ fee't~ thence-S°
45~47, !I"~Eo, a distance of 4~o00 feet to intersect
.·s~utheriy boundary of the northeast~.q~arter (No Eo 1/4·), of~ the
southeast qmarter (S~ ~. 1/4) of. sai~!S~ction t5~ t~ence~So
89~ 2~, ~!~!" W., along last named south~rly·boundary'aI distance
of..123.049 feet to the-sqUthwest (S'o~W~)corner Of the northeast
quarter (No E~ 1/4) of the southeast quarter (So E~ 1/4)~
said 'Section'l~, the· point of~ beginning? containing 0o1888' acres'~
of land more or l~ss.
..,. ...... o0~
I ~EREBY 0ERTIFY ·that the foregoing ResoTution was passed
'and adopted bythe Councilor the City.of B. akersfield at a regular
mesting;thereo~ held on the 25th day'of. April, 1960, by the follow-
ing.vote:
Clty~lerk and"~x-Of~iclo Clerk of the