Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 66-59 VlEZ'CLUTZON l'!Oo _ 66-59 PETIT~Ci~TINC Z~E D!~ZCTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR APPROVAL OF E]~ENDITURES IN PROJECT NO~ 66 SETTING FOR'X{ ZiE F~ASON FOR FAILING· TO FOLLOW ~E REQ~R~IEMTS OF SECTION ~99 OF THE STREETS AND H~C~~v~ CODE. Section 199 of the St.~ests and Highways Cod~ pro~idcs bsfc.~?e expendit-i~r, of ga'S tax .street k~roVsmcnt f~unds to a city which is mud-ort~king a Street improvement, that. such city must f~rnish 'to t~-,s Department of Public Wo~ks~ fo~ approval~ pla.c:n, specificatloz':.c and cost-estimateS as may be..requfredo The C'it~- of Bal.cersfisld has undertsken .t0 improve S city street to ui'!;: Ch6cte~ ~vsnus ~nd has made .application for 'gas tax funds in cornhoot!On tb':'crewith~. A portion of Chester .~.v~nV-~ !s In the County of "~' improved ~v-= ~.id countyo ~.~, improvement arCo. the city bo~h~ary llne fell- -" 8 ~' ' · ~o pape~ ~o-~e Ocv. n~ oZ ~0. ~e~e.e~ oZ ~e' d,OnS~e~ion eos~' .,. I~C.~_{ OQVG'~..by/~i~e~D~lo~t Ne,'.9---~9, but plans and' specifications .... ~,rcrS not then availnb!o for said work, ' .~ ~: The' City of Bakersfield has been rexable 't6 Obtain the 'plan~ ~nd SpecifiCaticna for said'48" cu'lvert ~.tiB. recently and thereby has not been. ~.ble to fully comply ~-:ith So:orion' 199: of the Streets and Higrh~-~'ays Code bu~tll this date° NOW THEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the pls. ns and specifications which.wore submitted to the 'District Enginee~ on August 28 ~0~9 be apprbved and tha't. su=h costs as may be incurrc~ by the City pursuant.'to Agreement No~ 9-~9 be' inc!uded ~s ·part o2 Project No~ 68~ Memorand~ of Agreement _~ HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was .. passed· and adopted by the Co~.mcil of. the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the '8th day of Se~tember~ 1999, by the fol] owing. rots ~ ~,',,'ES: BALFANZ, BENTLEY, ~ COLL1HS, CROES, DOOttN, STIERN, · .t~OES:--~ .... · · ABSENT the Council .of the City of Bakersfi-eldo Z9 9