HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 54-59RESOLUTION NO.-
A RESOLUTION 0F THE. COUNCIL' OF ~:THE CITYr OF
BAKERSFIELD 'FIXING* A TIME AND PLACE' FOR HEAR~
ING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING'RE~L PROPERTY
WITHIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED.'
WHEREAS, a petition was filed ~itH.~he+Councit Of.-the-
City of Bakersfield.on-the 30th day.'Of"'~uly~,' !9~9, requesting that
certain uninhabited territory therein ~desCribed~.be.anneXed-to and
incorporated+within the City of BakerS'field, and...~.-.'
: WHEREAS, said petite!on+was signed ~by the' owners.~of all of
the territory proposed to' be 'annexed.
-~NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance Wi~h' the-uProviSions of the
AnneXation of-Uninhabited Territ0ry'~ACt 0f'Y1939~ Chapter 297, as
amended,-BE~iT'RESOLVED by the CoUncil of~ ~he":City-'of'*,Bakersfield,
as fOllow.s:..- ~ '
That..the boundaries' of the..te~itory so~proposed to be
annexed to the City of Bakersfield 'are des+cribed as follows':
A~ parcel of'~.land situate'in the..Coun~y'of Kern~ Stately,of
-California, and being a portion+,o~ Lots.-'?~andIl~, in Sec-
tion 18, Township 30 South, Range.28 East~,_M~o~D~ M., as
said"Lots 7 and 1~ are shown on the ~Kern CoUnty~Sales Map
No.. 1. of Lands of J. B. Naggin~" filed..for,$reCord May 3, 1889,
in the Loffice of the County Recorder,of said Kern County:
~ Beginning at the northwest '(N~ W.) corner of'said L0~ 7;
thence easterly along the northerly boundary of said Lot 7,
oneand along the corporate boundary o'f"the .City of'Bakersfieid
as-same is defined by that certain annexation designated as
"White Lane No. 3," as adopted .April' 9, 1957, by the Board
of .Supervisors of 'said Kern County, tO~interS'ect' aline
., .parallel with, and distant 10 'feet easterlye. aS measured
perpendicular to the westerl~ boundary of said Lot 7; thence
southerly along last' named paral!elline~"and the southerly
prolongation thereof, and departing+,from+I.the~corporate
boundary of the City.of Bakersfield,~to intersect the 'northerly
~ . boundary'of-said Lot 14, thelAst'namedl. nort~herly boundary.
also being the southerly. boundary~"lineOf*White .Lane of 60
feet in'width; thence westerly along said southerly boundary
· line. of White Lane to intersect~ the Isoutherly prolongation
along last named southerly pF~long~tion and al'ong'the westerly
boundary'.Of..'said Lot 7, on and along the...corperate boundary
of the City Of Bakersfield, ~s same...'iS~de~in~d-by zthat certain
54-59 ..... '- '
annexation' designated as "Whtt'e Lane' No., 2,~ adopted-
June 3, 19.57, by Ordinance No'.' 1122, 'New-Series, and' cOrtt--.
lied July'8,~1957, by the Secr'etary of State, State of.-
California, to the northwest (N.'.W.) corner of-'said Lot 7',
the point of beginning, containing. O.3103 acres.of land,
more or less.
That a designation appropriately_naming such territory is
"WHITE LANE NO. 6." '
., .'jy
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatf'Monday, ',i:.': the~'7th..day. of
September, 1959,"at the hour of eight o'ci0Ck P.M..,. in the Council
'Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue,._.Bakersfield,' Cali-
fornia', is the time when and the place Where-any..'perS'on owning real
prop~r.ty-within'such territory.so propbsed to'be annexed"and'-having
any objectionsto the proposed annexation may appear'before tee' Council
of the City of Bakersfield and shOW.cause' wh~ sudh t. er.ritory should
'not be annexed.
I HEREBY CERTIFY-that the,fOregoing Res01ut.ion was.passed
and adopted ~by the Council Of' 'the' Cityj.:.of Bakersfield, ..at ,a .regular
meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of AuguSt. 1959, by the follow-
ing vote: . . .
Council Of the City-of Bakersfield,.