HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 37-59J
'RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE-COUNCIL OF THE CITY '0F 'BAKERS-
FIELD 'FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR =HEARING PROTESTS..
'BY· PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY IWITHIN 'TERRITORY
PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED. ,~ ~
IWHEREAS~ a petition-was filed ·with, the -Council of~ 'I the City
oflBakersfield' oh the 18th day-of May, ,1959,_ reqUesting~'~hat_+certai'n
Uninhabited territory therein described be annexed ~to· and incorpoTated
~ithin the City of Bakersfield., and '- "'
NHEREAS','. said ~etition WaS ~ig~ed by-the 0.~mers' of. all of the
terri$ory.proposed .to be ~nneXed. -~ ......
- NOW,.TE~E~ORE, in complian6e"with the ~r0V. isions'0f.the
Annexation of ,Uninhabited Territer~.A~t'.~Of 19+39,- 0baTter 1297, as
amended:, 'BE' IT RESOLVED'b~' ~he 0ouncil'o~.the City-of Bakersfield,
as foll~ws: "" ...... "'
That ~he boundaries .of 'the territory sO proposed to be...annexed
to the City of. Bakersfield are des6r'lbed as follows': .-....+...'.
- A parcel' of land situate in .the County-:'of .Kern.,'.;S~ate of
:- .California, and being ,a po~ti0n. of+Se6tioh~."l and 12, Town-
.ship 30 South, Range 27..East~ .M. Do M..: ..
Beginning at the southeas$'corner '0f LotS]5 fn said Secti'en
12, as.said ~ot 5 is .shoWn on "Kern Coun~ Sales Map No. 1
· '6f"-Lands of J. B. Haggin,". filed'May~3,' lee9., in. the ·office
:.of the'County'Recorder of said.'Eern County; thence we's~erl~'
.....a~eng the~southerly boundary of. said. Lot'5 t~ in~er'sect 'the"'
westerly'boundary of the East '165 feet ofL.Sai~ Lqt 5; thence
· "northerly..along last named.WeSte~ly:~0'undary..,tO inter~ect" :
the+northerly. boundary of. Said Lot 5, ap0int.'on the..north--
" " erly'boundary of said. Sec~iqn 12';-thence cSnti~uin~nor.therly-
· ":+. a. distance of 30 feet as measured p'~rp~ndicular,to' the "
' Southerly 'bOundary. 'of said Section 'l,.f! to. iiit'e~sect' the north-.
· ."' .eriy boundary of Ming Road, 'also-known.. as casa Loma-Drive, '.. '
""'~. '~-'of 6,0' fee~ in width;· thence 'easterly~."along last-named-northerly
· · bou_ndaPy~ tO intersect the Inor. therly prolongation of the.
/-- _easteriy. boundary of the nOrthweSt quarter (N~'. N.- 1/~), of
~aid Section '12, a point on ~the corporate boundary of th~ ..
' p~o!0~a~ion and' along the. said--eastePl~ b0undaPy.-of the .
northwest quarte~' (N, W. 1/4), of;Section'.'12~ and along 'the
easterly .~b0undary of. said ;.LOt ~'~'On' ~'nd a. long.. said corporate
bo~da~,. as same is defined '.:by' .t~t certain ameXation 'kno~n
.as Benton Park No.-2, as 'adoptO'd~:-0ctobe~ 15," i956',. by
Ordinance No. ll0?, New Series, and certified N0~ember 19,
1956,-by..Iths' Secretary o£1S.tate,· State'Of .Calif~ornia,.' to'
.th'e southeast corner of 'said LOt ~.~..'the'. pdint of beginni.ng,
.~cOntaininE 2.616 acres of 'land, urnore' or less.
· ,. -~, _ . . .. · , ,~ -
That'. a designation appropriately n~ming isuch' teatit'cry is
~'MING NO,. 2. "' · -
BE IT F. URTHER RESOLVED, that Monday , 'l - the lll5'~h .day 0£ 'I'JUne
195.9'~'. at the hour. of eight-o'clock P.~.~ in~.Ithe'. C0ku~i.l'Chambe.~s
of" thee .City Hall~, 1501 TrUX~un Avenue, BakerSfield~ California, iS
the time"when land the place where ~ny pers,6~-0~ning .:re~l property
within such ~erritory sO prOpoSed .to'~.'be 'annexe~ and.h~ing .any
ob:j..~ctionls to the proposed annexa.~tion~'~ay
of~ ~the Oity .8£ '.Bakersfield and sho,~ cause why. .suSh territory shouid
not e xe~ '. : : .. - .. :
--'~.'~o0o ...... ' " .... ' '
· . , ~ . . .
:. ~..-.I~.:.HEREBY 0ERTIF~ that the' forS'gO'fng Resolution was p~S-s'ed and
adopted'by' tt~p.. CoUnC. il of-the Ci.ty o.'f.: Bakersf~eld.- at'a regular meet-
-. ... ?.--~ ...- ..
ing: thereof- heId on the 18th day.,.of. M.a.Y,- 19~9,"~by .the': fQltowing vote:
~. -- .~ .
" ' - '-.... ~ ~',~" .'~"".' "._ "' ' . City '~.l,erk-' and.'~x-0£fibio. Clerl~ .of 'the
'.~Z'.'~...;.~-:~y~.',[~ :j" -.'Co~nci~ of th'e City~:-of :Bakersfield.-
~ , ',.~'-~.:?. ~..S- .... .-- ~ - ,... · , . . . , . , ., .. . .. · .
.. - .. -- . . .., . ,
..... ..: '..,.. -,.',
- , - .- , ,. ~..', ..~ ',-,
--- 2 .... -..