Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 48-58RESOLUTION NO., 48-58. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERS~ FIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL pROPERTY WiTHIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED. WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City- of Bakersfield on the 24th day of July, 1958, requesting that certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated within the City of Bakersfield, and WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners-of all of the territory proposed to be annexed. NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the Annexa- tion of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, as follows: That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows: A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, and being a portion of the southwest quarter (S.W.1/4) of Section 15, Township 29 'South, Range 28 East, M. D. M., which is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest (S.W.) corner' of said Section 15, and as described in that certain Grant .Deed, recorded August 7, 1956, in Book 2646 of Official Records, at page 591, in the office of the County Recorder of said Kern County; thence N. 0° 14' 34" W., a distance of 674.04 feet, to the southwest (S.W.) corner of the north half (N. 1/2) "of the south half (S. 1/2), of the southwest quarter (S.W. 1%4) , of said Section 15; thence N. 89° 22' 41" E., along of the southerly boundary of the north half (N. 1/2) the south half (S. 1/2) of the southwest quarter (S. W. 1/4), of said Section 15, a distance of 55 feet, and to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N. 89°I 22' 41" E., along last named southerly boundary, a distance of 139.71 feet; thence N. 24° 45' 34" E', a distance of 186.77 feet, to a point on a circular curve, and from which point, the radial center of said curve bears S. 24° 45' 134" W., distrot 470'feet; thence northwesterly along said curve concave to the southwest and with a radius of 470 feet, and through .... a central angle of 12° 43'-04", a._diStanCe of 104.32 feet, to intersect the corporate boundary of the City of Bakers- field, and from which iontersection, the radial center of said curve bears S. 12 02' 30" W., distrot 470 feet; thence continuing northwesterly along the corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield, and as said corporate boundary . is defined by that certain annexation known as' "College Heights No. S," adopted August 19, 1957, by Ordinance No. 1140, New Series, and certified September 23, 1957, by the Secretary of State, State of California, on and along said curve, concave to the southwest, and with a radius of 470 feet, and through a central angle of 12° 17' 0L~" · a distance of 100.77 feet, to a point of compound' curve-, and from which the radial center of last named curve bears S. 0° 1L~' 34" E., distant 470 feet, and the radial center of the following described curve bears S. 0° 'IL~, 3L~" E., distant 20 feet; thence southwesterly along .a circular curve, concave to the southeast, and with a radius of 20 feet and through a central angle of 90° 00' 00", a distance of 31.42 feet, to a point of tangency, from which the radial center of last named curve, bears N. 89° L~5' 26" E., distant 20 feet; thence S. 0° 14' 34" E., and departing from the 'corporate boundary of the City of-Bakersfield, along a line parallel with, and distant 55 feet easterly from, and as measured perpendicular to the westerly.boundary, of the southwest quarter, of said Section 15, a distance of feet, and to the true point of beginning, containing acres of land, more orI less. That a designation .appropriately naming such territory is "COLLEGE HEIGHTS NO. 4". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that TUesday, the 2nd day of September, 1958,-at the hour of eight o'clock P. M., in the CoUncil Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue', Bakersfield, California, is the time when and the place where' any person~owning real property within such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections+to the proposed annexation may appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. ..... ooo ..... I HEREBY-CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and 'adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August, 1958, by the following vote: AYES: BALFANZ, BENTLEY, CARNAKIS, COLUNS~ CROES, DEWIRE, DOOLIN, - "ABSENT: "~' APPR0VED?~this~4th day of August, 1958 MAYOR of~the City B'a~rsf~'eld. · Council of the City of Bakersfield.