HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 22-57 RESOLUTION NO. 22-5?
RESOLUTION OF PROPOSED ANK~-CJ[/'~TZOI~ OF U!,]IN-
HABITED TERRYTORY AlqD SETTYY~G TZD~E FOR ~.R-
1NG TZEREON.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with ti~e Council of the City of
Bakersfield on the
19th day of April , 3-.957, requesting that certain
uninhabited territory therein describe6 be 8_nnexed to and incorporated
within the City of Bakersfield, and
WHEREAS, said petition was si~ned by the-owners of not less
than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of land in such territory, and seepre-
seating not less than 'one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of such
territory accord~n~~ tO® ~he last precsding equalized assessment
of the County of Kern.
NOW, TERE?OE', in compli~ce ~ith the provisions of the ~anex-
ation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 19'39, Chs;~ter 29V,-as amended,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council 0f the City of Bakcrsfie].d as
T~'at the boundar, ies of the territo-~y so proposed to be annexed
to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows:
That certain parcel of land situated in the County of Ke.vn,
being a Deftion of Section i8, Township .~0 South' Range 28 i~Jast,
M.D.B.& M., and more particularl~r described as follows:.
Beginning at a point on the corporate boundary of the City of
Dakersfield, as said corporate boundary is defined bY Ordinance
No.898, New Series adopted January 2,19~'L, and certified Febr-u-
cry ~,19%1, by the Secretary of State, State of California, said
point of beginning also being t.f~e ooint of intersection of the
sc. utherty line of P!anz Road of 60 feet. in width, with the South-
easterly llne of the Sourhelen Pacific Rail.m~oad, Asphalto Eranch,
right of way, of 100 feet in width, as said point of intersec-
tion is shown On map of Tract !~o. 1817, recorded l~Yove~:ber 23,
19%6, in Book 9 of Maps, at.page 104, in the office cf the
County Recorder of Kern County; thence departing from said
corporate boundary, southwesterly along last named so:~theasterly
line,-and along the southweatov!y prolongation theFeof, to in-
tersect the ea:st'erly line of South H Street, of 60 feet in width,
· also known as Kern Island Road~ thence southerly parallel ~:~ith,
and .distantI 30 feet easterly, as measured psrpendic~u!a~ to' the
westerly boundary of Sections. !8, Tounship 30 South, Range
East, M:.D.B.& M; , to intersect tlne northsr!y,._b~qu_~fa_ry.pf ]Lot
.............. t'~-," in ~i~' Section I8~'~'~ ~i:~' 'L'6g"l'~'~S sai5 SeCtion 18 are
shown on '~Kern County Sales i':iap i~.~C~l of lands of J. B. Haggln",
filed for' record May 3,1889, in the office of saie County Re-
corder, said.. nor. therly boUn~ar,y of Lot i~ also bei'n~ the
'southerly line of White Lane of 60 feet in width~ tb..snce cast-
erl~ along said southerly line of White Lane, ~o interse~.t
the southerly prolongation of tbo easterly boundary of i'.ot 6~
in salad Section 18, as said i.,ot 6,fsshown on said "Kern
CountV-.Sa!es Map No. t Of Lands o~' J. B- Haggin'!; thenc~
northerly along last named 'Southerly prolongation, and
along- the easterly boundary of: Lots 6 and 5- i.n said'-
.rich 18, and as said Lots 6 and 5 are shown on s.eid "Kern.
County Sales. Map No. 1 of Lands Of J. B. Haggin"./to inter-
_sect' the southerly line of VPI~qZ .Road, of 73 feet in Width;
thence westerly along last named Southerly line"~ parallel'
with, distant 30 fe~t southerly, as ,: me asure d perpendicular to
the northerly boundary 0f said Section 18, and alon~ the corpor-
ate. boundary of the City of Bakers~ield, as said .corporate
boundary is defined by said Ordinance No. ·898, New-Scr~.es,
to the point of beginningS, containing 72.963 .acres' o.f land
~Ore or less, .,
That a designation approprl'~t~Zy naming Such' .:te'r~i torY .is "WHIT~
LANE NO. 2". .
BE IT FURTER RESOLVED that Monday, .the ~ day of
at the hour: of eight o'ctock P. M., in the Council of the City. Hall,
1~01 Trytun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the ti~s when and the
place where shy person owning 'real :property within such tartit'cry so
proposed to be annexed and having an~r objeCtiOns' to the proposed annexa-
tion may appear before the Council of '~he City of Bakszsfield .and sho~.~
cause why Such territory shouid not be-annexed.
...... o0o .....
I HEREBY bERTIFY that the foreg0i~S Resot-ution was pa'S'Sed and
adopted by..,the Council of the City of' Fakersfield at 'a-regular meeting
thereof Held on the 29th day of Apri!~ i957, by the-.: foliowing.vote:
City ~].srk and Ex-Officio~lerk of 't~s
Council. of the City o.f Bakersfield,