HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 48-66RESOLUTION NOo 48-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF ~ C~T~ OF
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIRE A~ P~C~ FOR
PROTESTS BY PERSOI~S O~NG RF~L FRDFE~T~
TERRITORY DESIreD ~ **~ ~ ~0~ l°'~
P~POSED ~ BE ~D ~ ~ C~ ~
FlED,
WI~EREAS, a petition was filed wi=h the Coupell of ~hs
City of Bakersfield on the 4=h day
certain ~t~bl~ed ~erri~ory the=sin ~e~c~lb~d be annexed ~o and
~co~ora~ed within the City of ~e~$~iela,
~~S, said petition wa~ ai~ ~y ~he ~e~ o~ no~
less C~n one-~ourCh (1/~) o~ the a~u o~ ~h~ land ~n s~ch
CerriCo~ and rep~esenChg not les~ ~n ~n~-~h ~1/~) ~ Ch~
assessed value of such Ce~iCo~ ~ccord~n~ ~v ~h~ I~8~ p~ec~d~E
eq~lized assessnnc ~11 of the C~ncy
mnded, BE IT ~SOLV~ by the Co~c~l
as foll~S:
annexed Co ~he Ci~ o~ ~kers~tel~ s~ ~rl~ad s~ ~llow~
A p~rcal of land si~e ~ ~he Ccun~
and bsin~ ~. portion o~ ~ha ~.~. 1/~
said Section 9, ~aid poin~'ba~ ~
north l~e o~ Section 9 and ~he es~
said Section 9;
sou~h line of ~he north
as said ~ Is sh~ o~
~.D.B. & ~, ."~tlad for
said sou~h line beth da~
~he O~tc~al Eacords o~
aas~ line of s~id ~ ~
~MCE (3) southerly alon~ lss~ ~
coma~ o~ said Lo~ 9, ~
THriCE
(5)
(7)
point in the north right of ~ay line of ~acc~ Drive
(County Road No. 995)~ of ~ fee~ in wtdCh;
easterly alor~ last na~a no~h line and ~he sou~h
line of Lots 10 and 11 el ea~a '$~le~ ~p' co =he
sout~st eo~er of ~a~ ~ 11~ ~ ~ou~h~ cone~
berg a poin~ on the co~o~e bo~a~ o~ ~he C~y ~
~rs~teld;
along the followin~ 5 co~ ~ ~h~ corporal® boundary:
northerly along the
~s~ eo~er o~ said
North 329 feet;
N. ~.2eO0'~., 988.8 fee~:~
'rasscs (8)
(9)
N.50°26*W., along sai~
poin~ of inCersecCion wl~h ~h~
'Section 9;
THENCE
(10) departtn~ from the co~a~a ~~ ~ee~erly along
the last md nor h ~n~ ~e ~he ~o~n~ o~ beg~~
. t
and c~h~g 103.43
~hat a dest~nation appro~~l~ ~n~ ~ch
iS "Casa Loma No. 1".
BE IT ~0RTeER RESOLVED, ~h~ ~m~F~ ~he 26~h day o~
September, 1966, aC the hour 'of 8.°00 ~o~ ~ ~n the Cornoil Chsmber;
o~ the City Hall~ 1501
the trine when ~nd
property wt~hin such ~errt~ory so p~o~ ~o ~e annex~ an~
having any objections Co the propo~e~ ~n~ion ~my ~l~s~ be:~o~e
the Council of the City o~ Bakers~el~ ~nd ;how cause why such
territory should not be' annexed.
......... e0ooo~o~
I HERESY CERTIFY that ths
pas~ed and adopted by the Council
~e~la~ ~e~tn8 ~he~eof held on t~
~h~ ~ollowin~ vo~e:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BALF. ANZ, COOLJN, HOSKING, PARK, RUCKER, STIERN, WHITTEMORE-
NOES: COUNCILHEN: ~
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ~
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~
APPRO VED ~
enn Hoa an
CITY A