HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 42-66A RESOLUTIOb] OF T~E COUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME A~ID PLACE FOt~ HEARING
PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPEKT~ W~T~IH
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS 'PI~NZ PARE MOo 9'~
PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO TKE CITY OF BAKERS-
FXELD o
City of Bakers field on ~he 12~h day of July~. !966~ requesting that
certain ~inhabited ~errito~ therein described be annexed to and
incorporated ~;ithin ~he ~ity of Bakers field ~ and
W~AS~ said petition was signed by ~he o~ers of
less ~Mn one-fourth {1/~) of the area of ~he land in such
~e~i~o~ and represen~ins not less than ~ne~four~h {l/~) of the
assessed value of such ~erritory acco~dina ~o ~he last preceding
eq~lized assesaen~ roll of the Co~y of ~ern.
NOW~ ~FO~ in compllan~e ~qi~h the provisions of
~nexa~ion of UninMbited Territory Act of 1939~ ~pter ~97~ as
a~nded~ BE IT ESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield,
a s fo 1 lo~s ~
~a~ ~he bo~ldaries of ~he ~errito~/so proposed ~o be
a~exed to the ~t~y of Bake~sfield are described as follows:
A parcel of land slt~te in the Co~tl of Xe~n~ S~ate of Catlfomia~
and being a portion of ~he $.E. i/4 of Se~ion 7 and ~he N,$, 1/~
of Section 18~ To~ship 30 $ou~h~ ~nEe 28 Eas~, M.D.M: Beginnin~
at ~he south~s~ corne~ of Trac~ No~ 1878 as said southeas~ comer
is eho~n on ~he ~p re~o~2ded October 17, 195~, in Book 9 of ~pm
page 96 in the office of ~he County Records= of said Ke~n
said $outheas~ co~er beina a point in the south line of said
Section ?~ said poin~ beina 781.00 feet dls~an~ wea~erl7 from
sou~hast corns= of said Section 7, and also beinE a poin~ in ~he
co=potato bounda~ of the City of Bakersfield as defined by
O=di~nce No. 1~21 ~ew Series;
~CE (1) alons the foliowiVE 2 courses of said corporate
bo~~: N. 0°00 25'W., 660~00 feet~
THEIqCE (2) N. 89°52~15'E~ 48o253 feet to the southwest righ~ of
~ay line of ~he 8entral Branch Xe~ Island Ca~l as
sho-e~ on ~he ~p of said Tract Ne~ 1878;
corporate boundary~ along .:~he said right
of ~ay line ~ ~n~e~®~ ~he x4e~t l~ne of
the east 297 fee~ (18 roa~} of said Section 7~
southerly along a line parallax with, distant
18 rods (297 feet) westerly of the east line
of said Sections 7 and X8 to intersec~ the
south line of ~he north 30 feet of said Sec~
~ion 18~ said south llne being the eou~h
right of way line of Planz ~oad~ also ~own
as County ~oad No~ 5~3~ of 60 fee~ in width~
westerly along last named south line to in~er~
sect ~he southerly prolonga~ion of ~he eas~
line of aforesaid Tract Noo 1878~ said in~er~
section being a point in ~he aforesaid
corporate boundary;
northerly along last named prolonga~ion and
along ~he said corporate boundaEy~'a distance
of 30 feet, more or less~ to ~he poin~ of
beginnlnS and co~tatning 5.33 acres of land~
more o~ less.
designation appropriately naming such
is '"Planz Pafi~ blo. 9u.
BE IT M/ETHER RMSOLVED~ that Tuesday~ =he 6~h day of
September~ 1966= at ~:he hour of 8:00 P~Mo, in the Council Chambers
of ~He City Mall~ 1501 Trux~unAvenue~ Bakerefietd~ California,
is the time when amd ~he place where any person owning real
property within such territory so proposed to be annexed and
having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear before
the Council of ~he City of Bakersfield and sho~ cause ~yhy 'such
should mot be annexed.
AYES: COUNCILMEN BALFANZ, DOOLIN, }~O3KING, PARK, RUCKER, STIERN, WHITTEMORE.
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~