HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 181-08RESOLUTION NO. 1 8 1~ Q g
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 603
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SEVENTH
STANDARD ROAD, ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF
VERDUGO LANE. (WARD 4)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located on the south side of
Seventh Standard Road, on the east and west side of Verdugo Lane; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation to the City of
Bakersfield; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annex the site to the North
of River Sanitary District; and
WHEREAS, the North of River Sanitary District has agreed to annex the territory and serve
the site upon annexation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein,
located on the south side of Seventh Standard Road, on the east and west side of
Verdugo Lane.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government
Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to
the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the
affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to thgAKF,9
o`` ~-~
>- m
F- r
U ~
ORIGINAL
territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore, the City
prepared an environmental document in accordance with State CEQA guidelines
and will use the environmental document for the proposed prezoning and
annexation.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese-
Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with
copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Pamela A. McCarthy
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with
Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of
Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309.
------- -000- ------
2 o~gAKF9~
> '~`
~_ m
r
v O
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and ac~,QpTe~d by the Council
of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on IU~CC 8.1008 ,
by the following vote:
A ES' COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of th
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED OCT 0 8 2008
HAR Y .H L
MAYOR of the City of Bakersf
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
EXHIBITS: A Legal Description
B Map
C Plan for Services
3
o``gAK~9~
~-- m
U p
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "A"
"VERDUGO No. 1"
ANNEXATION No. 603
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Those portions of land located in the North'/s of Section 6, Township 29 South, Range 27
East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as fallows:
Beginning at the North 1/a corner of said Section 6, point also being the centerline
intersection of Seventh Standard Road (Co. Rd. No. 109) and Verdugo Road (Co. Rd.
No. 99), and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence (1) South 89°11' 12" East, along the North line of said Section 6, said North
line also being the centerline of said Seventh Standazd Road (Co. Rd.
109), a distance of 1325.53 feet, to a point of intersection of said North
line of Section 6 and the existing City Corporate Boundary;
Thence (2) departing said North line of Section 6, South 00°59'05" West, along said
existing City Corporate Boundary, a distance of 1277.24 feet, to a point on
the North line of Tract No. 6343, Phases 1, filed for record on June 12,
2007, in Map Book 58, at Page 11, in the Office of the Kern County
Recorder;
Thence (3) North 89°50' 19" West, along said existing City Corporate Boundazy and
said North line of Tract No. 6343, Phase 1 and the North line of Tract No.
6343, Phase 2, filed for record on June 12, 2007, in Map Book 58, at Page
14, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder; a distance of 1328.09 feet,
to a point on the centerline of said Verdugo Road (Co. Rd. No. 99) and
Northwest corner of said Tract No. 6343, Phase 2;
Thence (4) continuing along said existing City Corporate Boundazy and North line of
Tract No. 6361 Phase 1, filed for record on March 6, 2007, in Map Book
57, at Page 66, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder, North
89°50' 19" West, a distance of 1022.29 feet, to the Northwest corner of
said Tract 6361, point also being on the East Right of Way of the Friant-
Kern Canal, as described by the United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Reclamation Central Valley Project-California Friant-Kern
Canal Right of Way, Kern County Land Company, Drawing No. F-4406-
A, dated October 26, 1949, as filed in the Kern County Engineering and
Survey Services Department;
o~gAKF ~
s
>- m
{-- r
~, O
QRIGINAL
Thence (5) continuing along said existing City Corporate Boundary and Westerly
prolongation line of said Tract No. 6361, North 89°50' 19" West, a
distance of 266.17 feet, to a point on the West Right of Way of said
Friant-Kern Canal;
Thence (6) North 02°51'00" East, along said existing City Corporate Boundary and
said West Right of Way of the Friant-Kern Canal, a distance of 572.85
feet;
Thence (7) North 01°04'00" West, along said existing City Corporate Boundary and
said West Right of Way of the Friant-Kern Canal, a distance of 400.30
feet;
Thence (8) North 00°58'00" East, along said existing City Corporate Boundary and
said West Right of Way of the Friant-Kern Canal, a distance of 248.50
feet;
Thence (9) North 16°46'00" East, along said existing City Corporate Boundary and
said West Right of Way of the Friant-Kern Canal, a distance of 88.60 feet,
to a point on the North line of said Section 6 and said centerline of
Seventh Standard Road (Co. Rd. 109);
Thence (10) departing said existing City Corporate Boundary and said West Right of
Way of the Friant-Kern Canal, South 89°13' 14" East, along said North
line of Section 6 and said centerline of Seventh Standard Road (Co. Rd.
109), a distance of 255.00 feet, to a point on said East Right of Way of the
Friant-Kern Canal;
Thence (11) continuing along said North line of Section 6 and said centerline of
Seventh Standard Road (Co. Rd. 109), South 89°l3' 14" East, a distance of
1007.43 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 77.31 Acres
END OF DESCRIPTION
CHECKED by
KERN t~l1NTY SURVEYORS OFFICE
08th a y O,~f
Approved oy
~~,/~~--
o``gAKF9~
~`
v o
ORIGINAL
1S- U ~ ~' w
WO~O~ a Z z ~~~1 ~
a v •- NZprZ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N a ~ a
~ O~ O Y L,L~ ~ V= C7 N ~ ~ V Z ~ x.,.o„n a Y a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
Z p Z m~Z~~ U ~ i~ a W ~
O Z ¢ ~ OZ~OO ~ Q ¢ ti ~ ~ }
~ k ~ O ~ V ~ ~ ~ V ~
Q o w ~ ~~z~z ^ Z o e ~
i ~ ¢ ~ ~Z~~Q ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ?
Z ~ ~ WQ =3 w a `~ ` ~
Q N t~OWV .o.
taJ C~~~ ~~+~'
~ O~OQY ~ I .. < ~
I bl ~
z
o_ ~~
~$ ~_~~ '!~~
2 ~ m W -6~i-`
t
h~
i
2 ~ i~~q
: b
w ~ `~b y~ by i ',u`~,~j'
ay~ "b- I
i
~- ,/L'LLLI M ,50,6£00 5 (L) ~
i ~ (~
i
i M
~ ~ ~ g ! ~~ W
6 h~ h ~
'-l
~ ~ I
~ I
__~
(~' 10 .~- ~ ~ I
I 1 ~
~ r
N I ~ ~ Qq .., ' r.._.. y J`t~ _
)g q L~~ M
44VqI3 qq~~ I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ W
oeryi mi ~ ~ ~ Y Z
I] ~ I W ~ i. 11 ~~ _
oyuW ..I i ~ N
d\~^y i~ ~ ' I I I
~zbl~ ! i
i ~
U ~
_.._.._.._.__.. ~.._.._.._.._____._ J~ ___ 1, ,
_ _.._.._._.._.._.._.._..___ .._. W
-------- --
----------- _-_-_ _ _
I ~ ~ (66 'oN 9b '~J) I
- i i aroa oonaa.~ '~ ~ ~ I J
'~ !
O W ~ ~ y C
1 , I I £ p
~e .-; ~ I I, ; y
`3 $ r ~ ¢~X ~ q ___ ~
~r ~~ ~ ` ~+ ~ ~~ S
~; _
~-~ i
~- -~ - - -
3,il0,[L9BS (O!)( j ZO-090-ZO/ , ,LI'B9Z
1~ j 7YN17 Ny3N
1NYIN! M ,L{,OS.6P N (Ol)
f
$ ,OC'00/ ~~ ~ SB'LLS
10 N (L) 3
OO
IC
LO N (9)
/0
00
j ,
,
.
,
.
M ,
i 'w
G~ 8
~~ ~ e" H
~ 8 ~'
~~~ w a ~ , 4
a
zuw
o$
~
z ,
c`+~ ~
'
~l
i~ s~~
Fy
Z ~.rV $
,
~
~
~AKF9
~~
m
r
C7
IGINAL
O CITY psi
~ ~
v
r
cn
m
i
O ~ ~ 'n r
- (n ~ n cn ?i
• -v r -o 'v ~
,.
~
°-
~ o
o
~ g
m ~,
• o
~ ~
m ~
m o
• ~
~
~ ~,
~ ~
~ rn
~ ~ m a ~ m ~ ~, ~ -p ~ ~
• <
~ ~ C7 ~• ~ c o -~ ~ ~ n
~ ~ ~ o ~ ~
C o
- m ' '~
~
V)
rn
~ ~
~
v
..
0
~ (~ C7 C7 C7 C7 C1) n ~ Z n ~ D
~ ~ O O O O = O rn0
n 0
~
~ _ c c c c m c ~ c . ~
y ?7 Z Z Z Z ~ Z ~-i Z ~ n
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~W ~ ~
= zm ~
= Q° ~ ~
cn ~ ,~ m
~ D ~~
m
y 7C p
g -
-
v
~ ~ ~
O
N
n n toz n n n n n n n ~ z
m n >
c ~ ?
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
z
~
~ O
~ ~
~ o -
~ cu
~ ~~ m
~ ~
~ ~ D o0 0 0
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?
.
v~ ~
rn
~ ~m zrn
~~ N c
m
~~
~m ~.v 2
<
~m
D-
~~ ~,
fD ?
~
°
~ ~ o ~
-
m
~
O ~ v
N
.-.
1
n•
c C C G~ G~ ~O ,'oO oo ~G~ 'ilO G~ z G~ G~ ~ C) ~
cn cn ~n m m mm mm ~ mm cm m y rn m N~=~ Q,
m
~ m
~ m
~ z
m z
m <z
mm <z
mm -n
~ <z
rnm zz
vm z
rn z
rn z
m m m ~
N ~, o ~
a;
T '11 '1"I ~ ~
D Z~
cD Z~
cD -
< ZZ7
cD A
D :I7
D :I7
D ;0
D ~ -~
~ ~ N
m
m m
m m
m D
r
r
mr
~
mr
~
D
mr
~
r
r
r
r .
rn
~x~
r' _
o
~
~ y
X D
X Z Z V Z
v y
X ~ D
~c y
X ~~. m
~ ~ ~ v
G7 v
G~ < G7 ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ m Z
~ « D D rn D ~ < « ~' ~! m
~ Z Z ~ ~ -~p 'i Z Z Z Z n.~ ~
~ c c ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c
_~
~' ~ o
~ cmn urns z crnn crnn urns cmn a
'i _
'?'~
o m
a
~ ~
m
Z
O
~ m
~ ~
o =
< ~
v ~
~ n
N v
m
rn
D
z
z
<X
rn
~_~
cO
z
O~
Z•
Orn
• o
~w
8 .- N >.
y = ~ ~ ~ ~ U
~ i- ~ 0 3 ~ tti
j' ai O ~~ t w
~ -
~~ ~o c~ ~~ o~y
L ... ~ C
'~ C 7~ CO ~~ a V N
N ~_ a = 7 U A X ~ Z
td ~ O ~ O N -
N N ~
~ U c o-
~ ~N E•N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c` cca
Eo coo ~ Z o ~3`~ ~
w
•~ •<a ac ~ a o~ U ~ NQ ~ £ ~~ 3
C ~ 3~ C~ ~ U Y L N ~`+ C 7 `~ tyyC
a m ` ~ N~ O p~ c d C n 7 C1
d ~~ v_ m E as c"i~ c0 Q Z`rn ~ y
a N lC ~~ ~~ O a r ~ C d r d ~ N d .X •x
~ (0 ~ : `- ~ p ~ a .r ton O ~ M c ~ ~n c0 a~ a~ to
a~UcNOd ~a oc .pct o'00cco o~c ~ ~_ n
~ 3~ N (A n N N c n O d c~ N ~ y 0 V V ~
(A = O c ~ c~ cC
~ J p~ N "r ~ U O N ~? X~ O ~ .. ~ V V N
~a~'v,",NCi~xo~ axe Cy o~ ~o~ ~ Q '-
alncoddLCC_ mcn Nt a~~p Nn~ ~ ~ ~_
o x
~ N E E lL cC0 cS W~ HmCn H ~(A Q Q U
V j N N C N O ~~ Z` ~. V C p Y 'y, ~~ C ~
L N~ (tl~y:. "' C d ~ ~ p O ~~ t~ 'D d
3 3 E ~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~ 3~- ~ n ~ ~v ~ w
o
o yak ~°' o ,~ U 3E cc~3 0~ ~ L
c ~ x ~i r c"n °' c ~ Y ' ~ ~ ~ a ~ 0 3 ~ ~
o ~o ~' oc~ ~ acio ~ ~o ~0 0
oa c~~~ 3N m >o Z~-~~ ~~ ~ do
m ca ~ ~~ o~ N c ~ c aNi Fc c ~U 3 ~ ~
co o~U ~ c~ >. ~ v S~~ o ~ ~ .~ o
~ `~ Z a~ o ay ~ H N ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ .OC vOi
L p N ~ ~ ,~,+ O ~ N N O~ ~ ~` ~~ `. 3 L 3 d1
3 m> ~U ~~ x ~ a~ ~ o wU ~v ° uoi ~+ '~ ~ cn
N ~ +-~ C L
C O C ~. d 0~ C 0. '~-~ cd p c d cti c N A
+. U U R C N N 'O t` ~ r.+ d~ Z 7 N ~ y~
Z y U m C N •p N 0 0~ N ~, N ~~ c c N .~. N Z c
C '= N C r L L N ~ ~ ::+ `~' i O N ~ N C U r X 41 .Lt'
rn t~ - --pp 3t;~ O Z N vOi ~ ~~ Z d> ai «c >' c c c 3
C 3 y N~ ~ y~ Z 0~ .D N O •U IW- U~ '?~ r N ~ C t9 v~.
o E c^ ~°- o ~ w c acv c~ o ~ Z aaci ~ ~ rnE ~ c aci
C ~~?~ Z~C aLCNN W~c x UZ' a<n>«s ~~•x oa L~
~ GO `~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y Q ~ N c N ~ ~ y ~ m ~ m ~
L GG K ~ p C) c ~ N p n .-. p X n c~ ~
r
`~ ~ ~ ~ C ; O ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ RS U ~ L p ' ~ ~ d ~ ~ U ~ ~
> ~ y d ~ f~0 ~ ~_ lD cc0 ~ ~ZZ 0 C Q ~ ~ ~ V 3 N ~ ~. ~ `~ O L - Q N
c-" ~~ o Q.NO~ Z ;n N c 3 QL o ~' H S m ~ c'°~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ 3
N ~v ~ V~ o ~ a~~d ~ o ~ ~ ~ W ;? N N a ~.~ o W N ~ ~ ~ W o
co-~ ~ 3 m t W U~ ~ Z•~ Q.. ~ no Z~ pact W o w < p Hw
a a nz° LLla'~ a° ~~ °~' mcn c~n•3~ v $.~ ~.°' us ~w 3 ~ oU
N
O
c~
a
N
v
a°
'' m
~• r
U O
o~~AKF9s
T
ORIGINAL
1. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc)? The annexation of this territory will have minimal effect on the near term level or capability
of the City to provide needed services Upon future development, additional police officers would
ossibly be required to maintain the current level of city service. The planned development
including public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future
maintenance responsibility of the City but should not affect the existin4 level of service.
2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing?
Private development provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the Citv. No
upgrading or chance in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The territory is presently zoned A
(Agricultural) Zone.
4. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.)The City has
.. _.. .. ..,...~r. in__:.....,1 /'`..mmn-ni~l/ Planned
5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police
should be able to res and in a more timel manner than resent Count Sheriff services. Parcels
within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available Citv sewer system lines. The
gresent Citv refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to
independent companies No special assessments or charges for street sweeping leaf collection
street liQhtina energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's incorporated area
Cit overnment also rovides increased olitical re resentatlon for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existino tax rate in the area equals 1 085149% (TRA 099-
047 of assessed market value. This re resents the total ro ert tax rate. When annexed a
designated percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder
to the County for providing health care and social services (Rate as shown on 2007 2008 County
Auditor-Controllers 2007 Lien Date).
7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain.
No the current (2007 2008) tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
f3. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The ro ert rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No the existing annexation area is
not subject to a Williamson Act Contract.
Page: 3
C:\Documents and Settings\tstobert\Desktop\Exhibit C 603.DOC
o``gAKF9~
~. m
U p~
ORIGINAL