HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 17-64, R. ,S0LUTION 'NO.
· i7 - 64 .'~
~' ,"RESOLUTION ANNEXING: CERTAIN~ TERRITORY' " "
'...... .' 'DESIGNATED AS "'PACHECO NO.' .4'! TO~..THE ·
· '.. GREATER BAKERSFIELD "SEPARATION OF' .
', '..' -.'.GRADE DISTRICT I. .... I.:... · 'j. . · . :.'..'7
,: .- .
' ~E~AS', .the Council of Ithe CitY.'~'o'f'Baker'sfield. did~ On
.the' 3r.d: day ~f FebrUary, 19.64,~ pass its Res0~U~ion Of' Intention No.
5-64, 'to-'inciude."'ce~rtain property .designated a'S ','Pacheco No..
within' the Grea. ter 'Bakersfield Separa~io'~ of Grade' District,- and
did set the time and 'place for hearing Objections to t~e =inclusion
of .said te~ito.ry within said District.~ and' .-~,
'WHEREAS, said Resolution..of :Int~ention was duly and
~gkaliy published once. a week for .two we~e'k'~,- the ..fir,st publication
thereof being at '.'least twenty days ~prior to the 'date o'f. the
hearing a's. p~o~ided by law; and
WHEREAS~ Monday, the i6th aay/0f .March, '1964,., at .the hour
of 8:00. P'.M.,. was set as the time for hearing .objectionS" to 'the'
inc"lusion of said territory within.. ~aid DiStridt;.'and
WHEREAS, no objection has .been filed or '.presented to
s'aid Council td .the inclusion of said terri. t0ry or any part thereof
within the .Greater ~Bakersfield Separat{on'.0f' Grade.District., and
th'e COuncil further "find~' that all ofY .~aid' 'ter'~i.~ory will-be
.beneffted'.by its inclusion within said Di'strfct.
-NOW,-THERF FORE, BE IT RE SOLyF D . AND -THE COUNCIL -DOFFS
HEREBY 'FIND.:
That no: Objection to ',.~the inclusion of said .territo~y.'or
any part thereof within the Greater Bakersfield' separa.ti0n of Grade
District, 'has '.been filed' or presented to this council.
-same is hereby annexed to and included'.within"the said Greater
Bakersfield Separation of Grade'DiStriClt·.upon c~mpl·etion-o~ annex-'
'·,' a.[ion of. ~Said·.' territory to the Ci,ty of Bak~,sfield,'which territory
i~ '.-deSCribed. aS follows: · l ' L '
A 'parcel. of. land situate in the ' of Kern,
. C6Unt~. . st.ate of'california;
· . and being· a. pOr·tion' of Lots. 1 and 2',_in'.Se'Ction 1.9,"TOwnship
'South, Range 28 East, M.D.M., as said'Lots 1 and 2·are shown on the ·
"Kern· County· Sales Map No. 1 of LandSjl ofI J~ B. Haggin" , ·· filed ·for
record. May 3~ 1889, in the office, of the C6unty ReCorderof'said.
~ Kern county, ..and more pajrticularly described ~as foliows:
: Beginning at .the inter~seCtion of"the ·,W~.~te'rty boundary' 0f, the. East-·.
"half (E.1/2)and the north line of' said Lot 1, said point of
· n intersection being a' point on the ·c'urren, t. corporate. boundar. y. of
the City of ~Bakersfield as' defin&d 'Byi'Ordinance No...1495, New Series;
THENCE.' (1) easterly, .departing' from.+ the "said corporate Boundary,
· ·. " along the said north line of Lot'..1,, being the. southerly
· ~. right of way line~·of Pacheco Road", of 60'. feet· in Width,
.· to inter,sect the' northeast'COrner.of said·Lot 1;.
THENCE (2) southerly aiong~the~·east~..line.of ~said LOts 1 and 2,'
.' 'said east line' being the westerly right/of.~way Iin~ of
" · · 'Union Avenue, . also known as n U.S. Highway '99:, of. 115.5
· : feet in width.,' tO the n6rtheast .·corner of-"the'south
"· '7 'acres of the Eas't-h~l~ (E..I/2~' ~of ·Lot.'2"' .as 'described'
· in that certain Grant Dee~ '~cQrd'.e.d'March' 26,-1951,
in BoOk 1788 at page 508 in the~OfficlalTRecords
· of-said· Kefn County;l ,' -..,~..... .... _ ..
"THENCE (3) weSter~y"along' the northerly 'boundary'.of the,' said ·south
7 acres, and 'parallel to~-the soUt~ .line of said LOt 2,
'to a point. in a line parallel with 'and ·distant· 360, feet-'-
' · ' ~ ' westerly, as measured.. at right., ahgles to the .centerline
- ·' . Of said Uni6n-Avenue, .said 'point of. intersedtion being
· a point on the ·Current.-corporate 'bo~un. dary as defined
-- by said Ordinance No, l~95~"New-Series;·
· , THENCE (4) .'continuing westerly. along"' ~he northerly 'boundary
· -. the said south 7 acres and p~ratlel. to' .the South line ·
of'Said Lot 2' and along. the said cor'por~te b0undaryI
· .. .'~ to intersect.the westerly~.b0undary .of;the East-half'
'./ .~'·.'· (E.1/2) of Lot 2; .; ..
THENCE (5) 'northerly. along the wester!~ 'b:oundary of the East'half
'. (E . 1/2) of Lots 1 and 2 to' the 7 point j of beginning and
'· ~'· . containing 11.48 acres of.·l~nd, more or less.
'" 0oo '-" " -
..... : ......- ....:.~ L .. .......~ :: ......~ ......'_L. ..........: .....~:: ..........:7: ~..~ .~ _ :~:~... ~,: ..,.:·:. _ :-_: .::. :~ ~.~: .C ......L:-...-~: ........:-·.:---~ ......
..E , ., ,. . ~. . ..
· .. ~.. -.. · . .. '~
· .. .~ .
. , , ~ : .'.':.' . :.. ·.. .~ . ~ .
.. ..... .. ...~., .. , · ..
" " '2~. -~' ....
..'
.Ayes:
Noes: Councilmen: None
Absent: CounCilmen: None
Abstaining: Councilmen: None
I'HEREBY CERTIFY that .the foregoing ResOlution was
passed and adopted by the Councils.of .the City Of Bakersfield at"a
regular meeting thereof held on-the 16th d~y of March,, 19'64, by
the following vote:
Councilmen: Balf.~nz~ Doolin~· Marchbanks~. Mossman~. Rucker~,
St iern~ Whittemore -
/
/
Ci~~~an Ex-Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City. of Bakersfield,