HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 5-64 RESOLUTION· NO. :5-84
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO INCLUDE WITHIN ~THE
GREATER BAKERSFIELD..SEPARATION OF GRADE DIST~iCT
CERTAIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED. AS "PACHECO NO; 4",
AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS TO. THE. INCLUSION OF SAID TERRITORY
WITHIN SAID DISTRICT. -. :
' WHEREAS, proceedings'have Been. Lcommenced "for the annex-
a'ti0n of certain unincorporated territory, designated' as.' "Pacheco
No 4" to the' City of Bakersfield, and
. WHEREAS, .all of said' territory. .lies out'sid~ 'the Greater
BakerSfield Separation of Grade,DiStriCt, and
WHEREAS, Section 8290 Of the. Streets' and"HighwayS Code
'of' the· State of California, provide's that the uninc0rporated.'
territory of a county which was not included within'/a separation
of grade district at the time of the formation' of such district,
and which .subsequent. to the formation. of such' district i~-.annexed
to or otherwise included within a city which is :a·.part of =.suCh'
district, Sha'll immediately 'upon. such annexation to Such-city be
included within tHE district and shall .thereafter'become .a part o'f
the. district tO the same extent as'such city; except such portion-
or portions thereof.which the City C0un~il has determined. will
. .not be benefi~ed. by inclusion .in the' 'district'. "' :"' ""'
i-
' - NOW, THEREFOP. E,-BE IT P~ESOLVED by the'CounCil Of the City
:of Bakersfield, as follows:- ' .... .
l. That a description 0f the....uninco'rporated territory.
· described in the annexation proceedings,..iS.':as follows.:
A parcel of land situate in. the County ..of Kern,.. State of California,
and being a portion of '.Lots 1 'and '2,..in'. Section 19.,' Township 30
South, Range 28 East,. M'.D.M., ~S'-sa~d LOts 1 :and 2,.are shown on .the
"Kern County..'Sales Map No. i of Lands of. J. B.- Haggin"~. filed ~or
............. r~cord May 3;*'~"1889, in' the' offfe~"~'f~ghe 'co~ty"'R~c'~r-d~r "'~Y~'said ...... '"
· Kern County, and more particUlarly"deg~ribed,as follows: '
· Beginning at the intersection .of th~ ..W~.s.te.rl·y b0dnda~y of th~ East-
· "'-h'al~ (~.1/2) and the north line of Said: L6t 'l,,.,said 'point of. .
· .'..' .' "" '.. intersectioh .being a "point on the curr~nt C0'rpo.~ate"bo'undary ,' of..
' ' '. -the City of Bakersfield as defined,by-Ordinance N0. 1495,' N.ew"Series;.
.. ,:..:: :!.."..:..: .., ..:.!............-....-..... '.:....':'..:...-.,.:.;....-'.:..........;:,:......:-:...
THF, NCE. (5)
THENCE '(1) easterly, departing, from. the.:_said/' corporate b0~ndary,
.... -along the said .north ',line o~ Lot' 1, being the. s0uth'erly
right of way' line 'of Pacheco Road, of 60:-feet in width,
to intersect the northeast .corner.-of said 'Lot 1;
THENCE (2)= southerly alqng the. east. 'llne of said..L6ts 1 And 2,,.
said-east line being the ~est. erly.,righ.t of way. line. of
Union Avenue, also. known as:u.s'. HighWay 99, 0f. t15-~.5
· feet in width, .to the,'~norCheast corner of ':'the '.soUth
7 acres of 'the East. haI,f- (E . !/ 2)' of LOt: 2"-as described
in that certain Grant Deed..'reco~ded March' 26', 1951,
in Book 1788."at page-.508".in the official Records
-of said Kern '.= .County; "'-
-THENCE (3)'. westerly a, long the n6rthe. r.!y'~boUndar'y of t~e "sa~d south
" 7 acres, and parallel to':the south line,.of said"iLOt' 2, -
; to 'a point' in a. line 'parallel. with and.' distant. 360 feet
westerly, as measured at right angles 'to the centerline
o'f said Union Avenue, said 'point o'f~ in'te'rlSeCtion being
'.'j 'a point' on the.. ~ur.rent corporate boundary. as .defined
by .said Ordinance. NO...1495 ,,. 'New :.Serie's ~ '-
THENCE (4) continuing. Westerly.;. a'l-6~g the. 'nor'~herly b0und~r.y'..'of"
,the said south 7 acres ~nd.paraltel to the..south line
o~. said Lot' .2 and-along:' the. said 'corporate boundary.
to intersect the wes-terly .b'6unda.ry'.'pf 'the 'East-half.
northerly. along the 'Wes[~rl~.'boundar~ .o'f" the '.Eas't'hai'fl
(E.'.l/2) of LOts 1. 'anjd ,2 t6:'::.the:'.point o f ., be ginning and ·
Containing 11.48 acres '6f land, '~o~e'or-'less.
2~ That· unless any p~r'ti0~;i-~ha~i': be'~exClUded.by, the"'City
Council,· all porti6ns of ·.said uninc0rporated territory shall ~pDn
-jannexatiox{ to .the City of Bakersfield 'be in!clud~'d .~ri'thin the Greater
..- - , . ~ . . - ,' . . ,- - it
lBa~erSfield SeparatiOn of',Grade" District.. ,: '~ ,. :':"
· ~ - :~. · . : .... ,
· I._~ 3'~ '-': That Monday~ :the 16th :'day o.f Mai'rch', 1964,at' the ~
hour 6f 'eight. o'clock P.M:', in. the' Eouncil ChamBers'of' the., City
Ha 11,"i50 ~' Tr_UX~un" Aven~e, ' Baker s fie i d, -Ca li f6rnia,' i s. ~he time
.When and" the place where', obj'ections..!tq .inclusion {~ithin':the district
will be heard.
-I HEREBY CERTIFY that the, .foregoing ReS61Uti0n was
passed and adopted by the .Council 'of the City of' Bakersfiel'd, a[ a
regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd .'day.:'of-February,' 1964,' '~by
-the follOWing 'vote: .... . i.. . -
Ayes: 'Councilmen Balfanz, Doolin, Marchbanks.-, Mossman., RUcker,"'
"' St iern, Whittemore ' ' ., ... '
Noes: None
.... -
Absent: None.'- ... '.'
,,.Abstaining: 'None ..... : .... .-
-.
=:. · . .' ·... _, ,:.' ~. _' .-. '., , -. ~.. ' ...,
CITY ' ~' h
"':,'~':' "'" Council of the City'of Bakers field.
MAYOR' of ~th~;'~C-i~:ty"of Bakers~iela.