HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 4-64 ·" RESOLUTION NO. ~_6~- "- ..... :
A,:'RESOLUTION OF lllE 'COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF "~
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME.:AND ·.PLACE FOR' HEARING.
PROTESTS BY PERSONS .OWNI. NG.:.REAL PROPERTY.'WITHIN
TERRITORY DESIGNATED 'AS "PACHECO. NO 4" PROPOSED
TO. BE:. .ANNEXED TO THE CITY OFf. BAKERSFiELD·'.
to intersect'. the northeast' corner 'of said Lot -t;
THENCE;..'(2) southerly along the east iine' 6.~. said '.Lots ;1: and 2,
-.... 'said east line. being the westerly .right of way line Of
--'.- Union Avenue, also 'known -',-a~:~..u .'S. Highway. '99, of 1-15.5 · '
.- ' feet in width, 'to the northeast-'corner, of "the .south
' 7 acres of the East"h~if..'(EL-1/g) of Lot-" 2" as describ'~d," -
WHEREAS; a: petition was .filed '..with the Council 0,f the'
City of Bakersfield on-the 30th."'a~y'0f'7'JanU'ary, ,'1964~,' re"'~queSting,..
that certain uninhabited territ6'.ry-'therein. dgS, cr'ibed be "a~neXed .to
and inc6rporated .within· the' City 6'f Bakersfield,' and' '..:....- ."
WHEREAS, said petition Was'Signed by'the'Owners '0'f.not-
.... l'ess th'a~ 'one-foUrth (1/_.4)-of the area Of the' la~d in .s'Ueh
t~rri tory ,. a~d ...re'pre Senring.. not. le's s-'-than- one'- four ~ '(1/4)' 'o f' the
assessed value of 'SUch 'territory 'aCcOrding to the 'last preceding
equalized.assessment-'rol't of.' the 'CoUnty of Kern. ' :"
NOW~ THEREFORE, in complianc~ with :the 'pr, ovis'ions of the
Annexation:' of .Uninhabited Territory· Act .of 1939-, Chapte~:: .'297, as
'amended,. BE-IT RESOLVED by 'the 'Council of the' City.. 0~, BakerSfield,
as follows: ..' " ': "'-
That..-the -. boundaries. o.f 'the 'territory' so proposed' ito be
annexed. to. the City of .Bakersf'i~ld are describe .d as f0'·ii0wS. i
A' '.parCeI o.f land situate in the County-..Sf Ke.im, state of·califOrnia,
' and being .a portion of LOt's 1-and 2, '.'in' se'ctrion- 1'9,' .'Township. .30 :~·..
South', Range 28 East, M.D.M'., as 'said Lots' l'.and'.'2 are shown on the-
"Kern COun'ty Sales Map No'. '1 of Lands. of J. B. Haggin"., filed '.for-
record May 3, '1889, in the offi'ce 6f the County Recorder'.of-said
Kern County, '.'and more particularly-'.de. scribed as f011'0w~:.
'Beginning at 'the-'interSeCtion 'o~f ::th~ wes'teri'~ :.bo.undary/.of the' "East-
half (E'.t/2)'and the north line 6f]Said.':Loe'-1, .said point Of
intersection being a p0int"'.on the cur·rent COrporate b'oundar.y-.of
the City Of .Bakersfield as defined.by Ordinance No. 1495.-~ New Series;
THENCE (1) -easterly, departing from [he said corporate: boundary,
· '- :along ·the'-said north line o.f Lot 1, being the southerly.·
· in that' certain Grant Deed..recorded ~arch 26,
,.. .in Book 1788. at page 508-7in' the Official Records
Iof said Kern .County; ·
THENCE '(3) westerly along the northerly boundary 'of the· ~ai~d, south
7 'acres, and parallel to the south line of said 'Lot 2,
.·· to a point in a line parallel. with and. distant. 360 .feet
· Westerly, as'measured. at-right angles to the'centerline
of said Union Avenue, said.point of. intersection being
a point on the current corporate boundary as defined
by said Ordinance No. 1495, New Series;
THENCE (4) continuing westerly ·alOng the northerly boundary of
the said south 7 acres and parallel to the-south line
'i.-' of ·'said Lot 2 and along the said corporate .'boundary
"'to intersect the westerly boundary of the East-half
(E. 1/2) of Lot 2;
THENCE (5) northerly along the' westerly boundary of the~ East-half
'(E.1/2) of Lots 1 ands2 to the point of beginning and
containing 1·1.48 acres of land, more or~ less.,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday, the 16th·.day of
March, 1964, at the hour, of eight o'clock P.M., in the Council
Chambers ofo the. City Hall, .1501 Truxtun Avenue', Bakersfield,-
California, ·is the time when and the place wherel any perSOn owning
real properKy within such territory s'o proposed to:,~e annexed and
having any Objections to the proposed' annexation may applear before
the Council of the City of Bakersfield and ~show cause why such
territory should not be annexed. ""
o0o-~ .......
,Noes:-
i HEREBY'. CERTIFY' that "the ~' foregoiDg ReSolution was
.paS'sed and'. adopted by '[h'e couhcil',.of the 'C.{ty Of Bak~rsfield at a
regular meeting' thereof. held on 'the .3rd. day of FebrUary,:-1964, by
the following', ~vote
',Ayes: councilmen Baifanz, DQolin, :Ma~'dhbanks Mossman Rucker
I : BrierS,, Whittemore
None
Absent: . None .... - ........... ·. ~. ,---.. ' '
Abstaining: .NOne
--, ,- Council of thee City-Of Bakersfield., '
APP I., -day of February, t964 ......
.... ' "~:'~:' ' ~of ',~"~'~i~ of Bakersfield. ,.. '-: "
, - -.~,~_j~?2,, -~ , . ~ - -
, , . . ,~ ~,~ ~ - .
... .~, ,, .~, '.:. ~ ~ ',
Ex-O xci
CI rk of '·the