HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 80-63RESOLUTION NO.
80-63
" RESOLUTION OF INTENTION~.'TO INCLUDE: WITHIN THE"
· ~ GREATER BAKERSFIELD .SEPARATION OF.,. GRADE DISTRICT.
CERTAIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ·".OSWELL' NO.." 4,"
AND' SETTING THE TIME AND .PLACE FOR HEARING,=
OBJECTIONS TO THE INCLUSION OF SAID' TERRITORY
.. WITHIN .SAID DISTRICT ~
WHEREAS, proceedings' have-' been .commenced for the '~nnex-
ation of certain unincorporated territory, .de'S'ig~ated' as "Oswell
No. 4," to..the City of '~Bakersfie~d,~ and
· WHEREAS', all of said, territory~ lies', outside the Greater
Bakersfield. Separation of Grade District, and "
WHEREAS~ Section 8290 of the Streets' .and HighWays Code
of .the state of california, provides 'that the Unincorporated
terri.tory. of a county which was not ~inctuded within 'a separation
of grade district at the time of t~he f0rmati'on o£, such district,
and which subsequent to the formation of :sUc'h ·distriCt is annexed
to or otherwise included within a city Whi.ch is a part:'of such
district, shall immediately upon 's~ch annexation to such city be
included Wi'thin the district and :shall thereafter become-.'.a ·part of
the distri'ct to the same extent as' such cityi except such· portion
or portionS' thereof which the City Council has .det'ermined, will
not be' behefited by inclusion 'in the distriCt~ '
- 'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by t.he Council o'f the
City of BakerSfield, as follows:
1. That a description 'of-the .unincorpora'ted' territory
described in the .annexation. proceedings,, iS as follows:.
A parcel of land s'ituate i~ the county of Kerh'~i~'state~of california,
and being a portion of the ~.northeast quarter 'of Section 22,:
Township 29 SOuth, Range 28 East, M.D.M.;.
Eon~en~'ing' 'at 'the.+- n~fth~a~s'e-- ~~-f--'~a-id
· ·southerly along 'the easterly 'boundary of said· Section 22 to inter-
sec't a.line'parallel.with'a'nd dis. t'ant 55 ' f&et SoUther'lyl i~s~
mea'sUr~d ·perpendiCular to the northerly boundary Of· s~id ·Section.
22, said .point Of intersection be·ing a poin..t on the current
corporate. boundary of .the City 'of, Bakersfield 'as defined by .
Ordinance No: '1452, New Series', and also being the true poiht Of
be~ginning · .
, . . .~-.
TMF, NdF. (1).
rMF, NCF, · ( 2 )..
TMF, NCF. (3)
TMF NCF.
continuing. souther!y',.along~the easterly b0'undary ~f.
s.aid'..Section 22 to. the, .southeas.t.,corner .of the .North-
half '0f ~the northeast !q~art~r of' 'the northeast 'quarter
Of Said ~Section ,22; .' ~. ! ..... . '- .
west'erly.':"al0ng the~ s:.~Uther]'~.' boundary o'f' said. 'North- '.
half of the northeas:t quarter of .the nOrtheaSt
quarter to a point in.a line parallel.with and
distant '.328.'62 feet :~asterly, .as *measured" .at~ .right
angles to the' wes.te.rly boundary 'of:. the'n6rtheast
quarter of said Section 22; ~.. ,. I....-'~ .
~ , . · ,
'northerly along last named'parallel .line "to' intersect
a .line parallel wit~ and distant 55 ~fee't southerly as
measured perpendicular to the northerly b0~ndar.y of
· Said Section 22, said point 'of intersection being. a
point on the currentl corporate boundary;
easterly 'along· the' last ~amed pa~a. liel line, on and
along ·the current corporate boundary as defined. by
'said' Ordinance No. 1452, New Series, to 'the 'p~Oint of
beginning and containing 32. 21'-acre.s, of land,. more
or less. :- '
2. 'That unless~'any port'~on' ~shall be exClUded by .the
City Council, all portions of said .uninc'orpOrated territory shall
upon annexation to the City of Bakersfield be included within the
Greater Bakersfield Separation"of Grade DiStrict
3. That Monday,..the 4th_day of November,'1963, at the
hour of 8:00 P.M. ~ in .the Council Chambers of the City Hali, 1501.
Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield',-California, ,is the time Whe~ and-the
place Where, objections to inclusion within the distric~ will be'
heard~-
-o0o~ .......
C
I HEREBY' CERTIF.Y that' the' foregoing ResolU'tion ,was
parsed and aldO'pted by the CoUncil, of' the:City' of'Bakersfieid'=:at a
-regular meeting thereof held on the~ 23'rd day' of septemb.~r., "'1963
by the fo 11.Owing vote:
' ' ""' ' ' %' "' ' -AYES':' ' BALFAN~, mOOtIN, MARCHBANKS, MOSSMAN,' RUCKER, STIERN, 'WHITTEMORE'
APPROVED' this 23rd day-of :Septemb'er~- 196'3,
. Of the city of Bakersfield, ..
cz
T C an~ Ex-Officio' Cler.k of the'
Coun.cil of..the City of Bakersfield~
.-i