HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 61-63 RESOLUTION NO. 61-63'
A. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL O~ THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD DECLARING· THAT INSUFFICIENT
PROTESTS WERE. MAI)ETM TO THE ANNEXATION OF
TEREITORY DESIGNATED~.AS HUGHES NO..3~PROPOSED
'TO BE ANNEXED TO THE-CITY OF 'BAKERSFIELD.
':,,, . WHEREAS~ pursuant to the GOvernment C0~e of the State
of California,, Sections 35300 +and following, proceedings-have'. been
instituted 'for the annexation-of certain territory designated as
"Hughes 'No l" and
WHEREAS-, pursuant. to such proceedings a petition was
signed' and 'filed for such annexation, a reSOlution adopted
describing boundaries of ,the territory 'sOught to' be annexed,
publications '.had On said resolution .and a,..time .adopted 'for ,hearing
of protests from..persons owning re~l proper:ty-i'n. said territory~
"'·.EREAS,/a hearing was duly· held~ in the Counc:il Chambers
of the-City Hall'in the city of B~kersf. ield'i' t'he 29th day' of
July .1963, "at 'ghe hour of eight o.' clock -p"..m., pursuant'. :to. notices
given in compliance with law, and
',' WHEREAS, at said-hearing'· insufficient written or-oral
pr6te'sts were made by any person owning' property 'within the' afore-
said territory; .. ·
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the' COuncil of the
-..
City of Bakersfield .that;
" Said City Council finds and resolves that insUff'icient
pro.test-has been made to the annexation of real pr.0perty t6' the
City Of Bakersfield,. said pr0pe~ty being designated' as "Hughes No.
l" 'and more particularly described in'Resolution No~ '44~63 of the
.
-.
City...o~f, BakerSfield-
........... 00o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forego. ing. ReSoluti on.waS· '~
passed 'and adopted by the Council ~0f the City~ of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 29th day of. July, 1963, by
the following vote: ' "
AYES: BALF NZ, DOOLIN, ~-4ARCHBANKS, MOSSMAN,
ABSTAINING: . ,~
RUCKER, STIERN, WHITTEMORE
.'i
CI~ .CLERK and Ex-0~icio: Clerk of the
Council of thS City of'. Bakersfield.