HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 30-63 RESOLUTION NO .. -30-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF
· BAKERSFIELD. FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "WESTCHESTER NO. 1,
PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED' TO THE CiTY OF. BAKERS-
FIELD.
WHEREAS, a'petition was filed' With the ··Council of the
City of..Bakersfield on .the llth day of April~ 1963, requesting that
'certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and
incorporated within the City of Bakersfield, and ""-.
WHEREAS, said' petition. was .signed. by the Owners' Of not
less than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land. in such
territory, and representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the
assessed value of such territory according ·to the last· preceding
equalized assessment roll of the County of Kern.' .
NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions. of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter. 297~'-as
amended, BE'IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield,
as follows: ·
..
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed 'to ·be
'annexed.-to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows:'
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California,
and being a 'portion of Section 24, ToWnship .29 .South, Range 27 'East,
M.D .M:
Beginning at the most northwesterly corner of Tract No. 1387~ as
per map recorded March 26, 1948, in-Book 6 of Maps at'page 104 in
the office of. the County Recorder of said Kern CO. unty, said corner
being a point on the current corporate. boundary of the City 0f
Bakers fie ld; :. ·
THENCE .(1) westerly along the westerly.prolongation of the north
line of said Tract No. ·1387, and along 'the said·corporate
boundary. on a bearing of. N.89°44'15"W. (N.89°59'45"E.
record per map.of. Tract 1387) a distance .of 1154.753
THENCE (2) N. 19°04'40"E., '917.898 feet;.
THENCE..(3) N.55°50'50"E. 591.960 feet t6 the southwesterly right
of way line of U. S. Highway 99, as· .shown on Sheet 7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that ~he f0~egoing Resolution. was
.passed and adopted by the Council.of the City"of BakerSfield at a
regUlar meeting thereof held on the 15th day o:f April, .1963, 'by
the following vote:
~/~,YE'~ BALFANZ, CROES, DOOLIN, MARCHBA, NKS, MOSSMAN, RUCK~R, SI'~ERN
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING, ~. ......... ·
ci~'~cL'~,k'a~ ~~clerk of the
d -
Council Of the City of Baker. sfield.
THENCE (4)
THENCE (5)
THENCE (6)
THENCE
THENCE (8)
THENCE ( 9 )
~ENCE ' ( 10 )
of the highway construction plans for District VI, Ker
Route 4, Section G, approved by the District Engineer
March 17, 1947, thence southeasterly along ·said south- ·
westerly right of way. line the following 6 courses to
intersect the current corporate boundary;
S.47°16'E. 714.56 feet;? "
S.14°45'W. 187.53 feet;
S.63°30'22"E. 356.51 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of
472 feet;
southeasterly along said curve through ·a central angle
of 15o00'00'', a distance of' 123.57feet to a point of
tangency;
S.48°30'22"E. 468.76 feet; ·
S.47~'06'22"E. ·5.29 feet, more .or less to intersect the
said current corporate boundary;
westerly along·said corporate boundary· to' the point
of beginning, containing 31.02acres of land~ more or
less. ' '
Tha't a designation appropriately .naming such 'territory
iS "WESTCHESTER NO. 1." " .'
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday~ the. 27th day of
May, 1963, at the hour of eight,' o'Clock 'P.M., in the Councfl "
Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California, is the time when and the place where any person owning
real property within such territory so proposed ·to be annexed and
having any objections to the proposed annexation may-appear before
the Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause·. why such
territory should not be annexed. '.~ ., .-