HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 99-61RESOLUTION NO. ~99-6,1
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "CASTRO NO. 2," PRO-
POSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of
Bakers field on the 19th day of October, 1961, requesting that certain
uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated
within the City of Bakers field, and
WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners of not less
than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and
representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of
such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment
roll of the County of Kern.
NOW', THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as
amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, as
follows:
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be annexed
to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows:
A parcel ofland situate in the County of Kern, State of California,
and being a portion of Sections 11 and 12, Township 30-South, Range
27 East, M.D.M:
Corf~f~encing at the northwest (N.W.) corner of the southwest quarter
(S.W. 1/4) of said Section 12; thence easterly along the northerly
boundary of the said southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4) of Section .12, a
distance of 220.00 feet, and to the true point of beginning of this
description, said true point of beginning being a point on the corpo-
rate boundary of the City of Bakersfield as same is defined by
Ordinance No. 1330, New Series;
THENCE (l)
southerly and parallel with the westerly boundary of the
said southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4) of Section 12, to
intersect a line. parallel with distant 30 feet southerly
as measured perpendicular to the_no.~therly boundary of
the southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4) of said Section 12;
THENCE (2)
easterly along last named parallel line to intersect
the easterly boundary line of the west half .(W. 1/2)
of the northeast quarter (N.E. 1/4) of the northwest
quarter (N.W. 1/4) of the southwest quarter (S. W. 1/4)
of said Section 12;
THENCE (3)
southerly along the last named easterly boundary, along
the corporate boundary of the Cityof Bakersfield, as same
is defined by Ordinance No. 1276, New Series, to intersect
the southerly boundary of the north half ' (N. 1/2) of the
northwest quarter (N. W. 1/4) of the southwest quarter
of said Section 12;
THENCE (4)
westerly, departing from said corporate boundary, along
the last named southerly boundary and the westerly
prolongation thereof, to intersect a line parallel with,
distant 30 feet westerly as measured perpendicular
to the easterly boundary of said Section 11;
T NCE (5)
northerly along last named parallel line to intersect the
westerly prolongation of the northerly boundary of the
south half (S. 1/2) of the southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4)
of the northwest quarter (N.W. 1/4) of said Section 12;
THENCE (6)
easterly along the last named westerly prolongation and
along last named northerly boundary to intersect a line
parallel with the westerly boundary of the northwest quarter
(N.W. 1/4) of said Section 12, distant 220.00 feet easterly
as measured along the southerly boundary of the northwest
quarter (N.W. 1/4) of said Section 12, said point of inter-
section being a point on the corporate boundary of the City
of Bakersfield, as same is defined by said Ordinance No.
1330, New Series;
THENCE (7)
southerly along last named parallel line and along the
last named corporate boundary to intersect the southerly
boundary of the northwest quarter (N.W. 1/4) of said
Section 12, the true point of beginning, containing
18.765 acres of land, more or less.
That a designation appropriately naming such territory is
"CASTRO NO. 2."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday, the llth day of December,
1961, at the hour of eight o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California is the time
when and the place where any person owning real property within such
territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections to the
proposed annexation may appear before the Co.unci.lrof the City of
Bakersfield, and show cause why such territory should not be annexed.
o0o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakers field at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 30th day of October, 1961, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
BALFANZ, ~, CEOES, DOOLIN, t, AARCi.~DAI,IKS, t','',OSSMAN,~STIERN
:::2-z --,/
ABSTAIN 1 NG:
CITY CL~RK'~nd Ex-Officio Cler~ of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield.
APPROV~.D this ~th~~day of October,
MAY e City of ~akersfieid.
1961.