HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 75-61RESOLUTION NO. ', 7 5-61 '
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "PACHECO NO. 1", PRO-
POSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of
Bakersfield on the 20th day of July, 1961, requesting that certain
uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated
within the City of Bakersfield, and
WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners of not less
than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and
representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of
such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment
roll of the County of Kern.
NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as
amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakers field, as
follows:
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be annexed
to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows:
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California,
and being a portion of Section 18, Township 30 South, Range 28 East,
M.D.M., and as said Section 18 is shown on the "Kern County Sales
Map No. 1 of Lands of J. B. Haggin", filed for record May 3, 1889,
in the office. of the County Recorder of said Kern County:
Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 15 in said Section 18,
being the intersection of the easterly line of that north and
south public road of 60 feet in width, along the westerly boundary
of said Section 18, now known as South "H" Street, with the southerly
line of that east and west public road of 60 feet in width, along
the midsection line of said Section 18, now known as White Lane,
said point of beginning also being a point in the corporate boundary
of the City of Bakers field as same is defined by Ordinance No. 1122
New Series;
THENCE (1) easterly along said southerly line of White Lane,
(along the northerly boundary of said Lot 15)
on and along said corporate boundary as same is de-
fined by said Ordinance No. 1122 New Series, to
intersect the southerly prolongation of the easterly
boundary of Lot 6, in said Section 18;
THENCE (2) continuing easterly along the said southerly line
of White Lane (along the northerly boundary of Lot
14 in said Section 18) on and along the corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield as same is
defined by Ordinance No. 1260 New Series, to inter-
sect the southerly prolongation of a line parallel
with, distant 10 feet easterly, as measured perpendicular
to the westerly boundary of Lot 7, in said Section 18;
THENCE (3) continuing easterly along the said southerly line of
White Lane (along the northerly boundary of said
Lot 14) on and along the corporate boundary of the
City of Bakersfield as same is defined by that certain
Resolution adopted May 2, 1961, by the Board of
Supervisors of said Kern County, pertaining to that
annexation designated as "White Lane No. 8", and
recorded in Book 146, page 463, Official Minutes of
said Board Supervisors, to intersect the easterly
boundary of said Lot 14;
THENCE (4) southerly, departing from the corporate boundary of
the City of Bakers field, along the easterly boundary
of said Lot 14, and along the easterly boundary of
Lot 17 in said Section 18, and along the southerly
prolongation of last named easterly boundary, to
intersect the southerly boundary of said Section 18;
THENCE (5) westerly along said last named southerly boundary,
to intersect a line parallel with, distant 30 feet
easterly as measured perpendicular to the westerly
boundary of said Section 18, said parallel line
also being the easterly line of said South "H"
Street;
THENCE (6) northerly along last named parallel line and
along the westerly boundary of Lots 16 and 15
in said Section 18, to the northwest corner
of said Lot 15, the point of beginning containing
165.073 acres of land more or less.
That a designation appropriately naming such territory is
"PACHECO NO. 1".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Tuesday, the 5th day of September,
1961, at the hour of eight o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City. Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the
time when and the place where any person owning real property within
such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections to
the proposed'annexation may appear before the Council of the City of
Bakersfield, and show cause why such territory should not be annexed.
o0o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by 'the Council of the City of Bakers field at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 24th day of July, 1961, by the following vote:
AYES: BALFANZ, COLLOId'S, C2OZS, DOOLIN, MARCHBANKS, MOSSMAN, STIERN
ABSENT. ~ I_/
ABSTAInlING: ~--j'~"~ / '~
ER~'J " ' '
CI and j lerk of the
Council of the City of Bakers field.
APPROVED this 24th day of July, 1961.
M~YOR of the City of Bakersfie~id.