HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 31-61RESOLUTION 'NO. 31-6t
A RESOLUTION OP THE COUNCIL OP THE CITY 0P
BAKE~SPIELD PIXING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEAR-
ING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING. REAL PROPERTY
WITHIN TERRITCRY DESIGNATED AS "CORONADO N0.
3," P~OPOSED TO B]~ .ANNEXED TO'THe. CITY OP
BAKERSP IELD, CALIPORNIA.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with' the Council of the City of.
Bakersfield on ~he21st day of March, 1961, requesting that certain
uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated
within the City of Bakersfield, and ..
WHEREAS, said petition was signed.by the owners.of all of the
l~erritory/proposed to be annexed.
NOW, THEREPORE, in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act-of 1939,'Chapter 297, as
amended, BB IT RESOLVED by the Council.of the City of 'Bakersfield, as'
· ][ollows:
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed.tobe annexed
'to the City of Bakersfield are described as follows: ·
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State Of'California,
and being a'portion of the North half (N..1/2), of .the South half
(S. 1/2), of the.-Southwest quarter (S. W~ 1/4), of Section 12, Township
· ' 30 South, Range 27 East, M. D. M.:
BEGINNING at the Northeast (N. E.) corner'of the South half (S. 1/2),
of the South half (S. 1/2), of the Southwest quarter (S.' W. 1/4),
of' said Section 12, a point on the current corporate boundary
of the.City of Bakersfield, said point of .beginning also being
the Northeast (N. E.)corner of TRACT NO. 2438, as per map
'recorded November 17, 1960, in Book11 of Maps at page 134,
in the office of the County.Recorder of saidKern County;
THENCE (1) N. 89°'53' 44"' W., along the northerly boundary of said
TRACT NO. 2438, on and along the corporate boundary of the
City0f Bakersfield as same is defined by Ordinance No.
1327 New Series', a distance'of 1652.118 feet to a point,
distant.S. 89° 53' 44" E., 996.00 feet, from the westerly
boundary. of the Southwest quarter (So W. 1/4),' of said Section
12;_ . . ................................ . ........ ~ ................... : .........
¢ THF:NCE (2') N. 0° 01' 52" W., along a line :parall'el with the westerly '
boundary of the Southwest quarter (S. W. 1/4), of said Section
12, ald departing from the corporate boundary of the City
o[ Bakersfield, a distance of 66'0.439 feet to intersect the
northerly boundary of the South half (S. i/2),.of the South- west quarter (S. W. 1/4), of said Section 12;
THENCE (3) S. 89° 54' 17" ~., along last. named northerly boundary
a distance of' 1652.149 feet, to inte'rse~t the easterly
boundary of the Southwest quarter.(S. W. 1/4), of said SeCtion
12, a point on the current corporate. boundary Of the,City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (4) S. 0° 01' 42" E., along last named'easterly boundary, on
and along the corporate boundary of the City of,Bakersfield
and as said corporate boundary.is 'defined by Ordinance No.
1312 New Series, a distance of 12.286 feet more or less to
the Southwest (S~ W.) corner of that AnnexatiOn designated
as "Benton Park No. 5," saidIlast named-Southwest (S. W.)
: corner also being the Southwest' (S. W.) corner of TRACT NO.
· 2407,.as per map recorded. September 1, 1960, in Book 11
of Maps at page 122, in the office of'the said County-.
Recorder;
THENCE (5) S. 0° 01' 42" ~., continuing al. ong the said easterly
boundary of the Southwest quarter (S. W. 1/4) of Section 12,
on and a~ong the corporate boundary of the City.'.of Bakersfield
as same.is defined by said Ordinance No. 1327 New Series,
a distance of 648.398 feet to the Northeast (N. E.) corner
of the South half (S. 1/2), of.the South half· (S. 1/2), of
the Southwest quarter (S. W. 1/4), of said. Section 12, the
point of beginning, containing 25.054 acres of land more
or less.
That a designation appropriately naming such territory is
"CORONADO NO. 3."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday, the 1st day of May,.1961,
at the hour of eight o'clock P. M.', in ~he Council.Chambers of the
City Hall~ 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the time
'when and the place where-any person!owning real property within such
territory so proposed to 'be annexed and having any objections to the
pro'posed annexation may appear·before the Council of the City of
Bakersfield and show caus, why such territory should not be annexed.
..... o0o .....
I H~RP-BY.CP~RTIFY that the foregoing. Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at, a regular meeting
thereof held. on the 27th day of March, 1961, by the following .vote:
· AYES: BALFA[ig~ CARN~KIS COLLINS CROES DOOLIN ST|E2N "
~ ~?:~,~.~' "';,.,J+':, - COuncil of the City of Bakersfield,
APP~Z~D day of March, 1961, .
MAY~ of .the;City of Bakersfield.