Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 71-69RESOLUTION N0.'71-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "SAN DIMAS NO. 2", PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of Bakersfield on the 17th day of July, 1969, requesting that certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated within the City of Bakersfield, and WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners of not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment roll of the County of Kern. NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, as follows: That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be annexed'to the City of Bakersfield are described in attached EXHIBIT "A" which is made a part hereof the same as if fully set forth herein. That a designation appropriately naming such territory is "San Dimas No. 2". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Tuesday, the 2nd day of September, 1969, at the hour of eight o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the time when and ~he"place where any person owning real property within such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. o0o "" S~;i'~ Di;:':.:: ""' 2 A parcel of Icr, d si'i'uErX'e in the Courtly of i,',e;-r, beii~q a par'i'ion of Sec:tio;~s 18 anti 19 To:,.;n:-;l~ip 29 Scuti,, Ran,.':Fa'2~j East, , , . . 14.O.l.~. & 1'.'~. a,'~d re, ore par'i'icular'ly described as fol lo'.,,'s: P. ecJinr, ing at .'i-he in'i'ers,.:c:tion of 'i'he l~Or'i'h line of said Sec'l'ioi~ 19. v~i'lh 'l'lie !,!,:---r line o'[ -i'he Eas'~ 57 75 feet of. said Sac'l-ion 19 said in'l-ersoc'i'iori being ~ . , on 1'he X'!es'i' 'fi.clht of v:c.y line of Union Avenue, of 115.50 feet in v;id-;'i,, ancl being also a point on 'i'h¢ corpora'['9 boundary of 'rhe Ci'l'y of B~..kersfield as Ne',.t Series; -' defined by Ordinance r,Zo. 984, . 'l'hence (1) Sou-l-herly, along 'I:he las'l' named corpora'l'e bour, dary. and ;,test righ-l- · of ~.tay' line .'ro a po~n-;' on 'i'he corpora'l'e boundary of the Ci'ry of Bakersfield ~.zhich is 'l-he Nor'li~east corner of -[-ha-r certair~ ~nnc~xal-ion 'I'o 'i'he Ci'l'y of Bakorsf i e I d designated as "Oannon 'No. 2"- ancl as clef i ned by Ordinance 1405, Revt Series; .. .' ~hende (2) We'sterly and Southerly along 'rhe last named corporate boundary-re · i ntersec:t the Norti~ I i ne of Trac'r'No. 2j 46 as sai d tr'ac:-r i s shov,'n on a -inapr. ecorded July 16,. 1958, in Map Be>ok 10, pages 27 and 28, records of "' said Kern County, said Ror'l-h line bei.n9 also-['he corporate Boundary of the · . Cit-y of Bakersfield as defined by'Ordinanc:o No. 1184~ New Series; ~hance (3) X'les'l'erly .a lqng 1'he las'r named corpor~,'~e boundar,Z '-[-o 'i'he Nor'lhv,'est T' corner of-said 'i'rd;ct Re. 2146, said Northvtes-[' corner begin9 also ~; point on . ~'he cQrporate bSt~nda;-y of 1'he Ci1'y of ',Bakersfield as.defined by Ordinance No. 1721 ,. New Series; . '. , -. '/hence (4) t'es-['erly and Southerly a lqn9 the last named corpora're boundary -re '[he Sot'l'hc;as-l' cor'r~er: of block 630 as said bl6ck is sho:..'n on 'l'hat cer-l'air~ map dated 14arch 10, 1904, entitled "Sa'les t.4ap of the Kern Counl-y Land Con;pany Sho;.:in9 Subdivisions of its Additions t'o 'l'he City of. Bakersfield~ Kern County, California'~, recorded April 119, 1904, in the office of ' 'Coun-i'y Recorder of said.Count'y, said Sou-H~east.'corr, er being also .a point on 't'he corporate boundary of the Ci'l'y of Bakersfield as defined by Ordinance No. 1731, New Series; ~h~nce (5) ~'Zes'r.erly along the las'r named corpora-[-e boundary, 'being also along .-..1he Ngr'th. righ'l' of v,,ay line of 341'h Street of.82.5 fee-l' in'v:idl-h, 'I'o · Sou'rheas'[' corner of.Bloc:k*632~ 'as said block 'is shovm on 'l'he last named · . sa I es map. "~hence (6) Nor'['her ly, de~;a~ti ng fror,~. ti~e last r~amed corporate boundary, a long ..' l'i~e Eas-l' line of blocks 632, 655, 665, 687 and extensions ther.eof 1'o 1'he .. Sou-l'heast corner of block 696, as said blocks are shov,'n on the last named ':' sales .rnap, said Southots-P corner also beigg.a point on '['he Nor'l-h [~ght of, . tzay line of 42nd Street of 82.5 feat in wid-U~; '. : .. ~henco (7) Easterly alqK9 '~he I~s1' nan~e~ Nor:i'h r. ight of vza,z .line and along 'H~e South line of blocks 695 and 6~ and bx-r~nsions"l-hereof of. said South line 4'o jri1'er'sec-[' a line petal lel vzi'l'h 'lhe East' line of block 694 and dista~n-r. ~ ~ e, "'o 'rhe East linp of block 694' ': 82.5 feet East.as raaasured ~,.~ r.i~ht a. ng.les ~ as said block is .shov,'n on l-he last named sales map; : · . .Thence (8) Sou'['her ly a long the Sourher ly extension o~ -[he Iast r~ameEl pa.ra IIe I · line-~o in1'ersect l-he South line of said Sac-l-ion 7hence (9) Eas-~'er[y along the last' n~:med Sc>u-i~ line I'o '['h~ point of b.c:]in'nihg -.-,--'-- jr, el ~17 2c e:cres, ribore or- loss E:nd c~ I i n ~llc -.,,I . , ,.J . ,; ;~,. EXHIB.'ET "A" I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakers field at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of July, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN BLEECKER, HEISEY, REES, RUCKER, STIERN, VETTER, WHITTEMOI~E ABSENT COUNCILMEN; ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ,/~..,~/,>~,,,, Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED thi,s 21~t~- a of July, 1969 : ,, ~, Bakersfield APPROVED: