Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 11-69RESOLUTION NO. 11-69 ARESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "MOUNT VERNON NO. 2", PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City of Bakersfield on the 27th day of January, 1969, requesting that certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and incorporated within the City of Bakersfield, and WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners of not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory, and representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value of such territory according to the last preceding equalized assessment roll of the County of Kern. NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, as follows: That the boundaries of the 'territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Bakers field are described as follows: A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California and being a portion of Sections 15, 16, 21 and 22, Township 29 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B. & M. and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of the South 55 feet of said Section 16 with the Northerly prolongation of the East line of Lot 1, Tract No. 1282, as said Tract is shown on a map recorded July 25, 1946 in Book 5 of Maps at page 156, Records of said Kern County, said intersection also being a point of intersection of the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined by Ordinance No. 984, New Series with the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined by Ordinance No. 1579, New Series: Thence (1) Easterly along said corporate boundary as defined by Ordinance No. 984, New Series to intersect the West line of the East 55'feet of said Section 16, said intersection being a point on the corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined by Ordinance No. 1267, New Series; Thence (2) Easterly and Southerly along the last named corporate boundary to intersect the South line of said Section 15, said intersection being a point on the corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined by Ordinance No. 1452, New Series and also being a point on the East line of the West 55 feet of said Section 22; Thence (3) Southerly along the last named corporate boundary and the last named East line to intersect the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract No. 1629, as said tract is shown on a map recorded July 16, 1952 in Book 8 of~Maps, Page 23, records of said Kern County; Thence (4) Westerly, along the last named North line and Easterly extension thereof to intersect the centerline of Floral Drive as said centerline is shown on a map of said Tract No. 1629, said intersection also being the Southeast corner of Tract No. '1713, as said Tract is shown on a map recorded July 2, 1954 in Book 8 of Maps, page 135, records of said Kern County; Thence (5) N 0°15'47"E along the East line and Northerly extension thereof of said Tract No. 1713 to intersect the Southerly right of way line of State Highway Rte 178 (VI-Ker-178), said inter- section being 81.20 feet Northerly, as measured along the East line and Northerly extension of the East line of said Tract No. 1713 from the Northeast corner of Lot 29, said Tract No. 1713; Thence (6) along said Southerly right of way line the following 10 courses: S 71°29'31'~, 351.97 feet; Thence (7) S 72°07'43"W, 100.00 feet; Thence (8) S 74°59'28"W, 100.13 feet; Thence (9) N 88°13'03'~, 29.73 feet; Thence (10) S 72°07'43'~, 272.00 feet; Thence (11) S 71°33'20'~, 500.03 feet; Thence (12) S 69°04'33'~7, 375.53 feet; Thence (13) S 20°55'27"E, 105.04 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; Thence (1~-) Southerly along said curve, concave to the Northwest with a 2 ° radius of 00 feet, through an angle of 111 12'14" an arc distance of 388.17 feet to a point of tangency; Thence (15) N 89°43'13'~ along said Southerly right of way and extension thereof to intersect the West right of way line of Haley Street, said West right of way line also being the West line of the East 15 feet of Lot 12, Mesa Tract No. 2, as said Mesa Tract No. 2 is shown on a map recorded February 13, 1914 in Book 3, Page 4 of Maps, Records of said Kern County; Thence (16) Northerly along the last named West line and extension thereof and the West line and extension thereof of the East 15 feet of Block 3, Wilshire Heights No. 3 addition, as said Wilshire Heights No. 3 is shown on a m~p recorded May 4, 1911 in Book 2, Page 25 of Maps, Records of said Kern County and the West line of the East 15 feet of Villa Lot 12 of Drury's Addition to Kern City, as per map recorded March 18, 1907 in Book 1, Page 101 of Maps, records of said Kern County, to intersect the North line of the South 465.17 feet of said Villa Lot 12; Thence (17) Easterly along the last named North line to intersect the West right of way line of Haley Street, formerly Hay Street, as said Hay Street is shown on a map of Tract No. 1282, filed for record July 25, 1946 in Book 5, Page 156 of Maps, records of said Kern County; Thence (18) Northerly along the last named West right of way line and extensions thereof to the point of beginning and containing 130 acres more or less. That a designation appropriately naming such territory is "Mount Vernon No. 2". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday, the 10th day of March,~.1969, at the hour of 8:00 P. M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the time when and the place where any person owning real property within such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear before the Council of'the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of January, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN HEISEY, HOSKING, REES, RUCKER, STIERN, VETTER, WHITTEMORE NOES: COUNCILMEN: 77~,,~._~L.~ ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ~Z?~.i~ ~ ABSTAININC~ COUNCILMEN: n/,~~ CITY~LERK and Ex-~Offic~o Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakers field A 0 this '~7th ~day of Ja ar~, APPROVED: 1969