Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 13-68RESOLUTION NO, 13-68 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAI(ER~FIELD~ CALIFOENXA MAKING DETERMI- NATIONS AND CONFIRMING ~SSESSMENTS OF THE COST OF DOING THE WORX( ORDERED M3RSUkNT TO RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO, 822° WHEREAS, the Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakermfield, California~ has heretofore made and filed ~ith the City Clerk in the office of said City Clerk in said Cl~y, an assessment and diagram for that certain work and improvement in the City of Bakersfield, done under and pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 {commencins at Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code}~ and Resolution of Intention No. 822~ and '~REAS~ after the filing of said assessments and diagram, the City Clerk has given notice of the filing of said assessments and of the time and place set for hearing thereon the City Council, and said City Clerk 'having executed an affidavit of posting and mailing~ setting forth the time and manner of publication, posting and nmiling of said notices~ and WHEREAS~ at the time and place stated in said no~ice~ a hearing ~as duly held by the City Council~ and said assessment and diagram were presented and considered~ and all written p~otests and objections, if any.~ were duly presented, read~ heard and considered and all persons desiring to he heard thereon~ were heard in respect to any matter relating to said work or ~mprovement o~ to any act o1' determination of ~he Supe~intenden~ of in ~elation thereto, or to the con~rac~ for said work o~ perfo~nce of 'said work~ or ~o the ~ission or inclusion of any portion of the work in said contrac~, or to ~he correcthess of said aseessmen~ or said diagram~ or to any o~he~ ac~ or proceedi~S~ of said Superintenden~ of ~=eets~ or ~o any relating ~o said work, ~he assessment district o~ ~he p~oceedinge ~he=efo~ and said City Council hayinE received evidence =elatin ~o the e ~ec_~.!0~._,~. Said hea=~S has ~hereof ~$ been duly and o=her mt~er8 heard by ~he Ci~ Co~c~l~ be and ~he same hereby overtled and den~ed. Section 3. Each and eve~ s~ep ~o and ~nclud~ng sa~d hea=~ng~ has beeu ~uly and ~his C~y Cobell ia ~a~isf~ed w~h .... ~, .... OO0 ........ = ~la~ meeting ~eof held ~n ~he 19Oh day of Feb~~ 19~8~ by ~ follo~mg vo~e= AYES: COUNCILMEN HEISEY, HOSKING. REES, RUCKER, $TIBtN, VFI"rER, WHITTEMORE NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~"~a~'2,4_.,e ABSENT COUNCILMEN: 72a6~....}t_4' _ ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~ ~ Council of ~:he .C%~:y-.ef Bakeref~eldo