HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 104-67~SOLU~ION NOo 104-67
A RESOLVYflOX~ OF
PROTESTS
~ITO~ D~S~~D AS
'PROPOSED
FIELD ~
W~EREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the
City of Bakersfield on the 19~h day of December~ 1967~ requea~ing
that certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to
and incorporated within the City of Bakersfield9 and
WP~E~S~ said petition was si~ned by the owners of not
less than one°fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such
and representinE not less than ones fourth ~1/4) of the assessed
value of such territozT according to ~he last preceding e~ualized
assessment roll of the County of Kern°
NOW~ TaEREFORE~ in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of .i939~ Chapter 297~ as
amended9 BE IT Pa~SOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfteld~
as follows:
That the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be
annexed ~o the City of Bakersfield are described as follews~
A parcel of land situated in '~he County of Ke.rn~ State of California~
and being a portion of the Northwest one°quarter of Section
Township 29 South~ Range 28 Eas~, MoDoBo & Mo and more particularly
described as:
Beginning at southwest corner of Lot 5 Tract Moo 26~, as said lot
is shown on a map of said Tract No o 26A4, recorded December 6~ 19~1
'in Map Book !2~ page 108.~ records of 8aid Kern Ccunty~ said $outh~
west corner beinE a point on ~he corporate boundary of the City of
Bakers field as defined by Ordinance Moo 118~, New Series~
/
T~ENCE (1) easteri~ alons the last named corporate boundary~ being
also along the sou~h proper~y line of said lot 5~ to
in~ersect the ~est righ~ of way line of Union Avenue,
.... of 115o5 feet in width, being also a point on the cer~
orate boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined
y Ordinance No. 984~ New Series;
TEENeE (2) southerly along the last named corporate boundaz~]~ being
also alonE the last named west right of way line, to
interseo~ the south right ~f ~ay llne of 34th Streets> as
said 3~h $~re~ i8 desc~ibed in t~t cer~in deed recorded
April 27~ 1927~ Ln Book 163~ Page 230~ Official ~cords
o~ s~d ~m Co~y~ ~a~d sou~h ~gh~ o~ w~y line being
al~c on ~he coverage bo~~ of ~he City of ~aka=~field~
as defined by ~t special election held ~h 21~ 1939~
and ~ch results ~e=e certified by ~he Secre~a~ of
S~e on ~rch 28~ 1939~
~es~arly~ along the last named corporate boundaQF and
south right of ~ay line, Co the southeast comer of
desi~ed ~emortal Hospital Si~e~ as defined by
Ordi~nce No ~ 1002, New Series ~
THENCE (4)
northerly and northwesterly along the last named coro
pora~e boundary to the northeast corner of the tas~
named annexaCion~ said northeast comer beinE a point
on the corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield
defined by Ordinance Noo 1429~ New Series;
nor~h~es~erly~ westerly and southerly along the last
named corporate boundary ~o ~be northwest corner of
the aforementioned annexa~ion designa~ed '~Memorial
Hospital Si~e~ being a point on the corporate boundary
of the Clcy of Bakersfield as defined by aforementioned
Ordinance Mo. 1002~ New SerieS~
southerly amd westerly along the last named corporate
boundary to the southeast corner of Block 630~ as
said block is sho~m on chat certainnmp dared March
10~ 1904~ entitled "Sales Map of the ~ern County Land
Co~any Showing Subdivisions of its addl~ions ~o the
City of Bakersfield, ~m County~ Califo~ia"~ recorded
April 19~ 1904~ in the office of the Co~ty ~eco~der
of said County~
THENCE g>
northerly~ departing from said corporate boundary'.,,
along the east proper~y line of Blocks 630~ ~58~ 3
and extensions thereof~ as said blocks are shown on
the last named sales map, ~o intersect the
extension of ~he north line of Tract No o 21~e
~rac~ is sho~v~ on a ~p recorded Ju~y 1~, 1958~
~p Book lO~ Pages 27 and 28~ Records of said
Co~ty;
easterly along the last named westerly ex~ension to
the northwest corner of ~sid Tract No. 2146~ said
northwest comer being a poin~ on the corporate bom~
of the ~i~ of Bakersfield as defined by aforementioned
Ordinance No ~ 118~ ~ New Series 3
sou~heaste=ly~ southwesterly and southeasterly along
~:he las~ named corporate boundary to the south~es~
comer of Lot 5~ said Tract Moo 264~ being the point
of beginnin~ and containing ~2o50 acres of l~nd~ mo~e
or lasso
BE XT FUrTHERRESOLVED, chat Monday, the 12th day of
February~ 1968, at ~he hour of eight o"clock PoM.~ in the Council
o
Cha~be~ of ~;he ~y ~11~ 1501 Tru~%~m Avenuep Bakersf~eld~
~1~e~ ~$ ~he ~ ~e~ an~ ~he phce ~he~e any ~e~en e~mg
~?~ any o~5ec~ons ~o ~he proposed a~exa~on ~y appear before
~he Council of ~he C~y of Bake~sf~eld and show cause ~hy such
~er=l~o~ should no~ be a~exedo
........ o0o .........
AYES: COUNCILMEN HEISEY, HOSKING. REES, RUCKER, STIERN. VETTER. WHITTEMORE
NOES: COUNCILMEN: /,~ ~ . ....
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: /~(~'/t,,,~ ~.
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: /72~r,,).,.;,~,,t,_
Council Gf ~he City of Bakersf~e~do
A~M~LOV~D ~h~ f6~d eceee~ 67o
AP~ED ~