Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 101-67 ~ESOLUTEON NO. 101-67 A P~SOLUT~0N OF ~{Z COL,~CEL 0.'~ THE OF BE~RSF~ELD O~)ERI~]G ~ ~0~ IN PUBLXC ~O~Eb]T DESEXCT N0~ 82~. A~ DXMCTENG ~ CX~ C~ T0 POST N~ICE XNVX~NG BEDS ~FOR ~ ~A~_ ~e' Cl~y Co{~A~cti of ~e City of Ba~=~field did ~AS~ no~ice of ~e passage of maid ~d ~E~ZAS, at said he.£~ring held the 18~h day of December, f967~ all persons desiring to be heard were fully heard and ~11 o~a! and written protests and obj~e'=ions, if any~ w~e fully heard, and this C~y Council having given all persons presen~ an oppor~ ~:uni~y to hear and be heard in respect to any ~'~ers reia~img ~o ~ie work proposed~ 'the boundaries of the proposed assessment dis- crier. ~he serial bonds to be issued to represent ~np~id assess~nts e:he question of i,~he~her public convenience and necessity require such improvement~ or on an~ subject related ~o such ~roceed~nEs proposed by Resol~%ion of Intention No~ 824~ and ~HE~AS~ ~his City Council has received evidence relatinS to ~he proposed work~ the boerdefies of '~he proposed assess~n~ d!st~i~t~ and ~:b.e benefits to the property ~ be inchded i~ ~'~e proposed assessment district~ and wals fully informed in the premtses~ aCie!d~ California~ does hereby resoltve~' find~ deter~ne amd order as follo~s: SECTION I 'i~T ~rit'~en proi:ests and objections heard az~d received at ~be ~ear~ing ~,~are insufficient to constitute a maJo~:i~y p~otest cf the %~ork and assessment proposed '~y Resolution of %n~e~tion .E]o~ f324~ o:~ if s'~ch majoz-i~ay protest ~as received that ~his Cit~ Council adop~e~ a zesol%r~ion overruling such ~mjoz'ity protest~ SECTION T~AT '~te public interest~ eonvenienee~ and necessity ~Tequires ~ha~ the work described in [-24 be done~ SECTIO]~ =~-~T the City Co~ncil having acq%~ired the p~ovisions of t'he Improvement Act of t91! to order the ~o~k L~ie~eve~ant describe~ in said F~esoI~.'~ion order ~:he ~o?zk therein described ~;o be done~ ~oles, ~ye ~n~h.e~, and hou~e laterals and the Of flee of the City SECTXON ZV '~T~ the, City Clerk of '~he City of Ba~rsfield le here~ directed ~o p~blish a motice inviting such p~o~sals and ~efe~rimg . SECTXON V ~T th~ bids ehall be sealed and filed ~ay of Jam~ 1968~ All sealed bide so filed ~i~h the City Clerk -~he ~$~l~s of said bidding ~o ~he City Go~¢~!! and--g~.~-~ I ~ERE~Y C~RTXFY tha~ the fo=e~o~ng Resolution ~as paesed and adop~e~ ~y ~he Council of ~he C~y of ~a~e[sf~el~ a~ a =eg~la~ meetin~ ~hereof ~eld on ~he !Sth ~ay of December~, 1967~ by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN HEISEY, HOSKING, REES, RUCKER, STIERN, VETrER, WHITTEMORE NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~.(~p,,~ ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINING COUNCJLI,,AEN: