HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 90-67e
k~OX~'~Og k~o 90-67
~BERF~S, ~4ern Coun~:y has a popula=fo~ (196'0 - 29~984)
~1 e~ough ~o be inchded ~n one ceng=esa~o~l di~r~c~
~~S~ agricultural and bus~ese ~n~e~es~s are closely
in~e~oven within ~he co~y and diesimi~r ~o those interests
adjoining congressional dis~ric~s ~ and
~~S~ Bakersfield is the ce~er of
indus=~ for the Southern San Joaquin Valley, and
~~S~ Bakers field me~repoXi~an area can be
as one unit~ compactness of population and EeoEraphical
support ~his~ and
~~S, representation should be preached because
i8 ~he financial hub~ poli~ical seat~ and Ems a emil, hemoSeneous
population~
N~, T~MFO~ BE IT MSOLVED by the Council of ~he
City of Bakers field ~ ~ Co~y and ~he Metropoli~an area of
Bakersfleld be m~n=ained as a unit within one congressional
in ~he forthcoming reappor~ionment by the 8~ate ~gisla~ure,
Bg XT F~T~R ~SOLVED ~ the City Comcil of =he City
of ~kersfield suggests =~ ~he "Conrad" Plan submi~ted by
Assembly~m C~=les J~ Conrad mos~ nearly meets t~ criteria
forth above of any reapportio~en~ plan submitted to date and such
a plan meets wt~h the approval of the Ci~y
.__
AYES: COUNCILI,.~EN H~5"2?, HO59(ING,, REES, Rb'CKER, $TIEP, N, VETI'ER, WHITTSMO&~E
NOES: COUhIC~LMEN: /~/J~f-~c
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ~"~ .
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~~
Council ef ~h~ City ef ~ka~fi~ldo
APP~VEDc