HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 87-67 ~ESOLUTIO~ MOo 87-67
A ~S~LUTI~N ~F TES COUNCIL ~F T~ C~
OF ~~F~ELD FI~ING A~ DEC~ING
~T A ~.JORI~ PRO~ST ~S MOT BEEN
M~E A~NST T~ AN~T~O~ OF MXNG NO~
W~EREAS~ a ~rit~en petition was filed with the Council
of the City of Bakersfield~ requesting that certain inhabited
~er~ltoz~y therein described be annexed ~o t~e City of Bakersfield,
and
~$~ by Resolution Mo~ 81~67~ ~he Co~cil of the 8i~y
in certain inhabited ~e~rt~o~ con~i~ous ~o said city proposed to
be a~exed ~o said city~ for the purees of submit~ing to the
q~lified eXec~e~s residing in said ~:ez~fito~. the question whethe=
e~ not said ~er~tto~ shall be annexed to ~aid city~ and se~ing
~~S~ a copy of said resolution was published as
required by law~ and
W~S~ October 30~ 1967~ a~ the hour of 8:00 Po Mo was
the time set for hearinS protests and a ~jori~y protes~ has no~
been ~de by any person ouing proper~y within the aforesaid
~~3~ all proceedinSs have been had in accordance wi~h
the Annexa~ion Ac~ of 1913~ reference ~here~o heine made for further
particulars ~
N~ ~MFO~ BE IT F~SOLVED by the Council of ~he City
of.Bakersfield, as follows:
T~t at ~he ~tme set for hearins protests to the proposed
election and a~ ~he time ~o which said henfinE was held a ~jority
p~o~es~ h~s ~o~ bee~ mmde by p~i~a~:e o~ae~s
of ~he ~e~i~ proposed ~o bs annexed,
eq~X~z~d as6as8men~ =~1~ or by publ~c and p~vate o~er~ eq~l
~o ens=~lf of ~e value of sa~d
......... 000 .........
X MERgBY CE~TIF%[ ~ha~ the foregoing Resolution
passed and adopted by the Council of the Ct~y of'Bakerafield a~ s
~egularmee~img thereof held on ~he 30~h day of October, 1967, by
the following
AYES: COUNCILMEN HEISEY, HOSKING, REES. RUCKER, STIERN, VETrER, WHITTEMORE
NOES: COUNCILMEN: ,9~ ~ I _
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ~ ~
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~ ~