HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 69-66planned ramps in the vicinit~] of Union Avenue would result in
~raffic congestion at Union Avenue if cons~acted at ~hi~ ~ime~ and
~~$~ ~he ~i~y~ Planning Bep~en~ and ~he
Division of Mightaye ~ve ~econen~ed t~ no c~nge be ~de
the location of ~he p=opo~ed inl~iaX f~e~sy r~ps in ~he vicinity
of Union Avenue~ and
W~ES, the completion of ~hfs free~ay ~o connec~
~ig~my 178 and the Alfred ~rreil MiSlay east of the City would
pemi~ the ul~e freeway ra~$ to be considered in ~he vicinity
of Union Avenue ~i~hout resulting ~raffic cemgem~iom at ~his
location~ and
~~$~ ~he ul~a~e fre~ay ra~m in the vicinity of
Union Avenue ~111 bet~eT se~e the local c~nity ueing ~he fre~ay~
and
from Mr. Vemon Avenue ~ill hasten develo~en~ ~ ~he
W~S~ the easterly extension of ~he 178 Freeway will
a~lo~ more efficien~ ~raffic movemn~ ~o and from ~he northeast
of B~ke~sfield as folle~s:
1. ~t no c~nge be requested in the cons~c~ion of
the ~a~s tn the vicinity of Union Avenue for ~he
......... 000 .........
AYES: COUNCILMEN BALFANZ, DOOLIN, HOSKING, 9~'K, RUCKER, STfERN, WHITTEMORE,
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT COUNCtLMEN
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN= ~"Z~