HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 57-66RESOLUTION NO o 57-66
A PdZSOLUTION OF TI-IZ COUNCIL OF TME CI~Pf OF
BAKERSFIELD ADOPTIMG A~ 5UBMI~NG A BUD~',T
FOR E~E~I~ OF FUNDS A~~D ~OM ~
S~ HIGHWAY F~D ~ CITIES
WHEP~EASs a master agreement has been executed by the City
and the State of California on April 3~ 1961~ for expenditure of
funds allocated from the State high~ay fund to cities~ and
%~MERFa~S~ the City Council has prepared a budget proposal
showing estimated expenditures of such funds recommended ~o be
made during the 1966-67 fiscal year~ and
WME~S.~ the City Council has heard read said budget
proposal and is familiar with the contents thereof;
NOW~ TMEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of Bakersfield that said budget propomals dated September 6D i965~
be and it is hereby adopted as the budget of proposed expenditures
of the gas tax allocation to cities~ said budget proposal be and
the same is hereby approved and the Acting Director of rublie
Woz~ks is directed to sign the same on behalf of said budget proposal
to be submitted zo the Department of rublie l~orks~ State of
Galifornia~ in accordance with the provisions of Section 197 of the
Streets and ~igh~ays Code°
......... oOo .........
AYES: COUNCILMEN BALFANZ, DOOLIN, HOSKING, PARK, RUCKER, STIERN, WHITTEMORB,
NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~_~
ABSENT COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAiNiNG COUNCILMEN: ~
.STATE HEC-MWAY ENGINEER
Sacramento,,, California
Budget eosal No. 1
Date September 6,
,19__
66
(TO BE TRAN.~ITTED TNROUGN.DISTRICT ENGINEER)
R. E. Deffebach
District F.n~inec. t
Address P. O. Box 135~, Fresno
BUDGET PL~OPOSAL FOR STATE ALLOCATED (SECTION 2J07) FUNDS
The City of BAKERSFIELD hereby
submits this budget proposal for expenditure of-funds allocated.from the State Highway fund to citiesduring the. '.
19 66 - 67 fiscal year. All work accomplished by this budget shall be done under the terms of t~e master agree-
ment covering the budgeting and expenditure of these funds as executed on .April 3, 19 61
(date) , '
Main~naneo. C)~her ' Rieht of Way
Construction
$252,666.09
Clgy Fund~
Cht~=f Fur. Ja
Total '
(See following pages for details)
Includes pre~iminary ~nd cons~uction englneerlng.
$252,666.09
SUMMARY OF STATE ALLOCATED '(Sac. 2107) FUNDS AVAILABLE**
Unexpended under Project 68 (City)
Unexpended under'Project 76 (City)
ia~crued & unbudgeted to Iune 30, 1966
Estimated to accrue during the fiscal year ending Iune 30, 1967
0.725¢
$- zTsb-'-s. 2 8
O.O6
5,417.75
245,'880.00
Plc:~., o~x~:lflc~'loeg G~ e~ti~oe of co~t f~ oock con
2W~tl~ ~ I~ove~ project will ~ submi~od in
~c~O with ~tl~ 1~ of t~ ~rNte e~ HighwaVe
~ FI~ ~o ~vedlGi~ ~ cem~nclng~w~E by doy lahr.
"· Atf~ch c~f~dltlor, ol pegs if
fhi e eum~.fRory.
(FORM MC-18 (3-64) Ray.) 6CC-I 3
( I -66 )
Total funds available ,$ 252,666.09
Acting D~ector o~ PubZic Works
.®
- Project NO~ -
Ae~o~nt
-2
DESCRIPTION
Name of Street
Beginning and and
of proposed week
,ength In Miles
PROJECT STATEMENT
PROPOSED 'IMPROVEMENT OF SELECT CITY $TREET,$
(Use separate sheet for each praises):
The proposed work consists of
projecf NO-*
And total e.timeted cost i. $ OS?,,eGG,(~ , including engineering.
TRAFFIC
Estimated hourly trafficVolume approaching intersections will not exceed capaCIty of prOpOsed street for cuffsfit
traffic and for traffic ten years hence. (Rof.: Division' of Highway, Circular Letter No.~ 5842). (YES)
If NO, explanation given on Page 4. : . .
RIGHT OF WAY
'Estimated cost $ m . To be acquired by (City) (State).
Present width feet. Proposed width fat.
' TOtal width provided by set-backs ft. (present) ........ ft, (proposed)
CONSTRUCTION
Estimated cost $ 26;,666e~ (including engineering). ' '
Supervision of construction and construction engineeering... (City)
SWellloft of preliminary engineering. (CIty)· ~
· GEOMETRIC SECTION
(ROf.: Topic 4.01 City and' CoaporOtive Pro!acts Ma.ual of Instructlo. s)
ADT upon cO pie+/on ;~LSeSJ~ - -: ........ '* ......... ,
DESIGN ADT ': ' · * EXISTING PROPOSED
N.he, end w,dth of ,raffle ~....'e. ii*~/r'a~ 13,! 6'a' Zi~' e'~'"
Width.of curb parking Lt.
lanes
Median Width
Width of curb off-sets
Width of turning
lanes ·
T.,.I ,w|d~ hetw.n .xt.rio, curb. ~-2/3'er' ~"
Re4sons for less than donlr.ble width, explained on page .4. *
STRUCTURAL SECTION*-
Tjaf~ic Index ' C~eO
R-Value
Pavement thickness and type
Base thickness end'type
*Types: .BS- bituminous seal,
AC- aspbaltic' concrete,
· EXISTING
"POSSIBLe FUTURE
DEVILOFMENT
I':" ~ '~';' *":' "' ....' "'
el' l!~' 15°'*"el' .... 19' ..... .,'
..... .: ,
· PROPOSED
· (Tasterive)
AS.-'aggregate, base;' '*
· A~-- aggregate sub-base
RIdAS-' road-mix aspbaltic .urface
PCC '+Portland cement concrete
CTB - cement treated bq,e
SOURCE OF FUNDS
$Nte ABlecared
(Sec. 2107) Funds
Cl~y Funds
C~n~, Funds
St. te'Nighw.y Budge Funds
Pmv~sly B~d
~itl~l F~e to ~ Bu~e~'
RI. GHT'OF WAY
TOTAL
* Inclndee preliminary and construction engineering.'
II
CONSTRUCTION' '
, li
TOTAL
PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
(For use where applicable)
(Show structural section and geometric details)
Additio~l Remarks: (explain special financing, basis of fund proportioning, reams for lees than desirable widths
and thicknesses, special construction features, etc.)