HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 190-08RESOLUTION NO. _~o --
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 610
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLD
RIVER ROAD AND TAFT HIGHWAY (WARD 5).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located at the southwest
corner of Old River Road and Taft Highway; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation to the City of
Bakersfield; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein,
located at the southwest corner of Old River Road and Taft Highway.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government
Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to
the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the
affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the
territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore, the City
adopted an environmental document in accordance with State CEQA guidelines and
will use the environmental document for the proposed prezoning and annexation.
~' ~,
~-
~,>
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of an
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese-
Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with
copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Pamela A. McCarthy
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with
Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of
Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309.
------- -000- ------
t~,Ak,~,
2 - ~<»
;.,
_: ,.
<,
y, ,,~,;_
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council
of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on NOV 1 9 20og
by the following vote: '
YES'
COUNCILMEMBER: ~/ ,~ ~ /
CAR ON, BEN AM, WEIR, COUCH
HANSON
SULLIVAN
SCRIVNER
S: COUNCILMEMBER: ,
,
,
V~l11,1 D
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: yl,ftll.Q._
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: GLPMR--
c
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk o the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED _ NOV j g~ „A ~
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By: ~ ~
EXHIBITS: A Legal Description
B Map
C Plan for Services
DL;dc
S:Wnnexation\Res of Applic\ROA 08\ROA 610.doc
3
,, ~,;
,;f/n
t,
r;
~,
Exldbit "A"
OLD RIVER ROAD N0.9
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION N0.610
LEGAL DESCRi~'I'YON
Being a portion of the north half of Section 6 together with a portion of Section 5, Township 31
South, Range 27 East, M.D.M. and a portion of Section 31, Township 30 South, Range 27 East,
M.D.M., in the County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the east quarter comer of said Section 6, as shown on Record of Survey filed in
Record of Survey Book 5 at Page 45, in the office of the Kern County Recorder, said point also
being the intersection of the centerline of Old River Road (Co. Rd. No. 26) and the south line of
the north half of said Section 6;
1. Thence along said south line of the north half of said Section 6, North 89°01'08" West, a
distance of 3424.23 feet to a point midway between the west quarter corner and the
southeast corner of the west half of the northeast quarter of said Section b;
2. Thence, along the line connecting said midpoint on said south line to a point on the north
line of said section being the midpoint between the northeast corner of the west half of the
northeast quarter and the northwest comer of said Section 6, North 00°37'52" East, a
distance of 2692.59 feat to a point on the North Right of Way line of Taft Highway (State
Route Vl-KER-119) lying 30.00 feet northerly of the north line of said Section 6, said line
also being the south line of Section 31, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M.;
3. Thence along said North Right of Way line of Taft Highway lying 30.00 feet northerly and
being parallel with the South line of said Section 31, South 89°09' 14" East, a distance of
2107.33 feet;
4. Thence departing said North Right of Way line of Taft Highway, South 00°41'51" West, a
distance of 883.94 fat to the northwest corner of Parcel "B" of Lot Line Adjustment No.
122-04 as shown on Certificate of Compliance Document No. 02051b2564 of Official
Records;
5. Thence along the north line of said Parcel "B" South 89°17'25" East, a distance of 1375.86
feet to a point on the easterly Right of Way line of Old River Road, said point lying 55.00'
easterly of the east line of said Section 6, said line also being the west line of Section 5,
Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M.;
6. Thence along said easterly right of way line, South 00°43'31" West, a distance of 159.27
feet;
7. Thence North 89°16'29" West, a distgnce of 25.00 feet to a point lying 30.00 feet easterly
of the cast line of said Section 6;
8. Thence South 00°43'31" West, along said easterly right of way of Old River Road, a
distance of l 660.72 feet to a point being the intersection of the east right of way line of Old
River Road and the south line of northwest quarter of Section 5;
9. Thence leaving the east right of way line of f31d River Road-and ~aiong said south line oftbe
northwest quarter of Section S, North 89°01'08" West, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Point
of Beginning.
Containing 186.70 Acres
Attached bereto is a sketch labeled Exhibit "B" and by this reference made part heroof.
~d t'O C)~
Charles A. Rueter, L.S. 4320 (exp. 6-30-10) Da
CHECKED by
KERN COUNTY SU ORS OFFICE
Date O ~~8
Approved by
r
?`'~~~~ S~q~F
crara.ES a ,c
c~' t~urc~ o
~ ~
* No. 4320
N~ Exp. 06-30{0 ~~
9,~OF CAL~F~j
i
~~~~
~8~~
~~
R
r ~;
w = k ;, ~ : ~
~6,
::~
~ ~ r ~ I
4 Y Z~ ~ x~
.: r ,: _ ,
~A ~ ~i~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ 1
~~ ~
_;,
,, ;; ~ - a ~ N11
rw ~UMr ~., I' ~ ~Yi 1 I
I~ ..-_ _- 1 5-- - -r F-T .._ . _..-- --=F- . __. ~ ~~
~~` ~ I I ~--t _ ,i r I~
°. ~ ~.
o_. ~c I I G-~0 m _ ' ~' +i
F,~d= I _ ~~ I I
i= ~~ ~ i " ~1 i c
~~~~ lid u I I ;
,~ E I i
1 i
C` [ I I L. _____~~ ~~ _~ ~Lf ... T...
I ~ ~ ~!
i
AN JI ~ I ~Y -q
". ~ l1t~ ~ y; n
`r.' ~ f F
~~
li t_
- ~'
~~ ii
YJ I ; I -
I c g
~,
< I S
- O~iM ~ I
-.:NG- ,~
I1
1
I'
~I
I
1
` I~
7.~
n., l
orn
'~ O
OZ
zW
Z
QOM
J
Xp
Z~
Z
Q
V
H
m
K
W
W
V
o~
W
N
O
a
Z
J
a
m w
~
v
~ ai ~
~
v~
cn
cn
vi z
cn
cn
a c ._
U d.
C C W W W W ~ JO ~ ~ W W p
~ ,~ `o Q ~ ~ U w U C7 ~ ~ ~
c~ .3 ~ X
¢ Xx
¢ XX
¢ x
Q z p z Z ¢ ¢ a
o ~ ~ F- H F- I- Q~ ~ Q~ Qy I- H °tS
_ ~ m
~ ~
Q ~
Q ~
Q .~
Q ~W
Q p
a JW
Q p JW
Q~ J
Q J
Q W
W W
W W
W
~
cc~~
~ N ~ N
~ N
e d y Q
W
Z Q
W ~
W Q
Wp ~Z
WW ~
Q
d ~Z
WW ~Z
WIIJ ~
W ~
W ~
~ LL
~ LL
~
i
~
S
~~ N
U
W Z
W
Q Z
W Z Z
Wp Z>
WW
~- Z>
WW
' Z>
WW Z
W Z
W W
(q W
(n W
(n
cu C7 C7 Z C7 C7tL C7~ m C
)~ C7~ U' C7 ~ »
V
.`
N
p
U
r
3 c~
p ._
N
~ ~'
3y a~
rn
.2 ~ ~i o a
o
u ~ ~ ~
c
~ v
U ~ p Q U U U U U U U U U U U U
~ J
~
a Q
Q W
U
_
d. _
~
p
c
•• }
Q W W
~
a _ W ~
_ ~ a
Z ~ ~ u- F- F- ~ F- ~ F-
~
' » > ~ ~ ~ ~ >
c Z o o o W
= o 0 0 >
0 >
o ZW
goc ~ a~
Q cn C) U U cn U U U U U ~Q U a
O
cv
~
V
~
~
.-.
U
Y
O
«r
c
~
~ ~
W
U ~
~ ~
a ~
o ~ ~ rn
c ~ ~
ro W
~
~ c
C Y f0 V a' ~ ~
fA c
C ~ :=~ U ~ ~ d
uWi a a ~ a° ii v~ U ~ c3n ~ ~ c°n' ~ O
U
r
a
'o
axi
c
qc
O
z
z
5
v
;, ;. ti _,,
~',
r'
~_..
~.r~ir.
£ S ~ •~ ~ ~ .~ U m
o ~_ E ca
_AN N .r JLn .L.. N-
C O N~ N N (O O "" y
.~ E a
~ LL O O >, ~ 'O
3 ~ a~
v; c`o °• o c c° o a •~ N
V 'O cad ~ O A (n x V Z co
O N NU C >+~ N N'O
~rn~ ~•~ ca `o ~ ~ a rnY ~
~' ~ c ~, •~ 8 c ~ U a~°i ° c~ 3•N ~
c ~30~ cy .c cu N~ c~~ 3
° ~NO° oa aoc ~d •o~c •nN~ a~ a~ ~
£~~4jNvi aN .yca ~~ a ~ ~~0 w ~ a
v~ d a~ E~ oLL• N ~•3 d -° 8 °~°.~~ c a~~ a a ~
° ° b a~ ~. ~ o ao _
d d N
a(n C"- a~i N O x~ axe t U ° a~i ° a~ O U_ > > d
O~~ N~ N t0 +' t ~~ Q Q
d L C C O G d •~ L N ftf 'C N O_ ~ O O ~+
= N ca E lL c0 U Z n F- ~ c i- ~ fn Q Q U
3
~- U ~ •N ~ t
N O N O .•_-
•~ ~ O ~ O c0 O y U~ ~ N- O
a °~O 30 ~
~ ~~ ~ O~ .~ Z N~ C O O L >~ U
~ .N. N N C y •C N ~ E C O 3 C O
~ w ~
C ~ 'C N y~~ E O V •lC ~ C •O 7 0 N .L-.
O ~ 0 '''' ` N i~ y U ~ ~ m` N >`
Y
~a~''va~ a~~ ~c° ~ cd ~ .n
a~ o ca C Q 3 ~ •• °~ ~
O
~ sa ~~°~~a`Ni a~Ei ~N H°~c 3o m ~~
•a ~'a°i oo°C~~3 ~. aci8 ='a~t °c--o o °m
~ ~~ Z ~s ma ~ Q Z p} 3 ~ axi .~ a8
... a c d
L d c~ ,~, ~ ~ ~ ~ v U .o .c ° ~ - m
_o m ~ ... p rn~ m c c= 3£ ~~ c.~ ~ U.N
`° •~ •E ~ c o c a •v ~ o ° -o c N E c ° ~ ° -v a~i cLi
p ai:.`_ ~>K U>.•oo~ :~' c ~y ~° ~ ~d •o Ncycu
c L ~ m o ° ~ ° ~ a°~ U m c ~ V~ o a°i ~= a a~°i co
~ Lco -OCC a-°irnN°° Z >, ~' Zs 3 5c D °~
3y •3m'm :°2~'iv~c~ O 'c `tN H~BN xc '3 ~w
E c _
o ~~~ °°o a~°°~ Q ~ o•c3 Zvaic~ °~~ m c~
~ cv °' ~ ~ y ~H a~ N WQ 8 U ~ a~ c c ~•~ •~ = c
G) >~ vt -c>>U W c~ Vai O~E.c O.- ~ a ~,
c ~ o~ 8 ° c 3 ~U c E ~ ~ t N vi H- ~ d ~. :3 ~.a
ao ~ °-~ •o~ c c~ ~ o'~o ~ Q ~; 8r V 3 0 ~L ~ 3 ~_ai
,.. N L w, ~ N > ~j F-
~ - 3 v~ J ,4? ~ W C~ V U Y Q ~~~ Z vci > N O 3 ~ c H = 0
n. O c~ao ~Im.c a~= ~ m F o o O ` ~ o rnW aca t-~'
a_~ri u.~3w8 a J ~na3 c~~'aU•~u~~s83 OU
N
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc)? The annexation of this territorv will have minimal effect on the near term level or capability
of the Citv to provide needed services. Upon future development, additional police officers would
possibly be reauired to maintain the current level of city service. The planned development
including public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future
maintenance responsibility of the Citv but should not affect the existing level of service.
2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or developer be responsible for financing? No,
if any additional development occurs, the developer provides and pays for major facilities and
dedicates them to the City. No upgrading or chance in facilities will be required in the territorv for
annexation.
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the territorv A (Exclusive
Agriculture) Zone.
4. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) .) The Citv has
adopted Ordinance No. 4351 changing the zoning A (Agriculture) to R-1 (One Family Dwelling).
on 235 Acres and from A (Agriculture) to R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwellings) on 78 Acres.
5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police
should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. Parcels
street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's incorporated area.
City government also provides increased political representation for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.070470% (TRA 135-
012) of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a
designated percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder
to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 2007-2008
County Auditor-Controllers 2007 Lien Date).
7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain.
No, the tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? Yes, however the Citv Council will
take no action on the Williamson Act Contract This Williamson Act Contract will be heard by the
Countv of Kern per a 2008 agreement with the State Department of Conservation
Q:WNNEXATIONWnnex 530\Exhibit C.DOC
3
?~ ,
~,
f-