The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/06/2008 B A K E R S F I E L D Staff: Rhonda Smiley Zack Scrivner, Chair Rick Kirkwood Harold Hanson Ken Weir REGULAR MEETING NOTICE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield Thursday, March 6, 2008 1:00 P.M. City Managers of ty Co erence Room, Suite 201 Second Floor- City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA A G E N D A 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT THE FEBRUARY 7, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Update on Block Walls Along Freeways- Rojas/ Movius 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT SACouncil Committees\2008\08 Planning and DevelopmenAMarch\08 March 6 agenda.doc B A K E R S F I E L D Zack Scrivner, Chair Rho da Smiley, Harold Hanson Assistant to the City Manager/ P.I.O. Ken Weir For: Alan Tandy, City Manager Rick Kirkwood, Management Assistant AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Thursday, February 7, 2008 — 1:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room — Suite 201 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield CA The meeting was called to order at 1:04:50 PM. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmember Zack Scrivner, Chair Councilmembers Harold Hanson and Ken Weir Staff present: John Stinson, Assistant City Manager; Rhonda Smiley, Assistant to the City Manager / P.1.0; Rick Kirkwood, Management Assistant; Steven Teglia, Administrative Analyst III; Ginny Gennaro, City Attorney; Bob Sherly, Deputy City Attorney; Raul Rojas, Public Works Director; Dianne Hoover, Recreation and Parks Director; Steve Hollingsworth, General Services Superintendent; Phil Burns, Building Director; Jim Movius, Planning Director; Marian Shaw, Civil Engineer IV; Ken Trone, Park Construction and Facilities Planner; Tony Martinez, Community Relations Specialist Others present: Dave Dmohowski, Premier Planning; Marvin Dean, Kern Minority Construction; Jeanette Richardson, Arts Council of Kern; Barry Hibbard, Tejon Ranch; Cassie Daniel, HBA of Kern County 2. ADOPT THE NOVEMBER 1, 2007 AGENDA SUMMARY Planning and Development Committee February 7, 2008 Page 2 Adopted as submitted. 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS Cassie Daniels of HBA of Kern County provided a handout for the Committee's consideration, which addresses the issue of deferring builder impact fees until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Dave Dmohowsky of Premier Planning, reiterated Ms. Daniels request and asked that the Committee take this matter into consideration. Committee Chair Zack Scrivner stated that the matter needs to be referred by a Councilmember at the next City Council meeting to be placed as a discussion item on the next Committee Agenda. 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee Recommendation regarding Amending and Adopting the 2008 Committee Meeting Schedule - Smiley Committee members adopted the schedule as submitted, with the understanding that meeting dates may be amended should scheduling conflicts arise. B. Discussion regarding Construction Workmanship Levels Cassie Daniels of Home Builders Association (HBA) stated that the Association is looking to do something similar to what the City of Clovis proposed regarding construction defect litigation (referring to the City of Clovis Building Division Memorandum). Ms. Daniels requested input from City Attorney Ginny Gennaro regarding any legal issues that would arise. City Attorney Gennaro advised that the City of Bakersfield does not have an epidemic of defect litigation, and was concerned that following the three courses of action stated in the Clovis Memorandum could expose the City to a civil process with great potential liability. Building Director Phil Burns noted that staff spoke with Steve Baker, Building Official for the City of Clovis and was told that the memorandum was initiated due to numerous lawsuits in their city. The memorandum was an informative process, but no formal policy ordinance was adopted by the City of Clovis. Ms. Daniels indicated she would inform the HBA of staff's comments. C. Discussion regarding Block Walls Along Freeways— Rojas/ Movius This item was initiated by Committee Chair Scrivner to address graffiti on block walls at the corridors of the community. Committee Chair Scrivner suggested that staff should set standards for block walls around the new freeways and expressways that will be built. Planning and Development Committee February 7, 2008 Page 3 Planning Director Jim Movius provided a background of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Freeway Beautification Master Plan and the long range strategy for improving aesthetics and the ambiance of principal arrival gateways and transportation corridors. The plan primarily dealt with Highways 99, 58, 178, and the Westside Parkway and was not specific in regards to wall designs and criteria. The walls brought forth by Council are walls required as part of sound mitigation on subdivisions in various parts of the City, and are installed primarily by private development. Public Works Director Raul Rojas added that the walls built for sound mitigation were inadvertently not included in the plan's category for freeway beautification. Two suggestions staff initiated were adding fencing or shrubbery, and texture to the walls to deter graffiti. However, walls located directly against the freeway pose another issue for the City to consider. City trucks used for graffiti removal cannot access these walls. The same accessibility issues holds true for installation and maintenance of landscaping. Staff has contacted Caltrans to provide some input on which direction to take regarding these walls. Committee Chair Scrivner added that in his discussions with Caltrans, they would be willing to let the City take over maintenance, providing such maintenance would not require lane closures. At Committee Chair Scrivner's request, Jeanette Richardson of the Arts Council of Kern presented to the Committee examples of block wall art and murals within the City and various areas in California, works from local artists, and children's art from weekend workshops facilitated by the Arts Council of Kern. Currently, The Bakersfield Californian website provides a map of murals located in the downtown area. Ms. Richardson stated that murals are effective tools to deter graffiti and also create an attractive entrance into the community. Committee Chair Scrivner asked staff to come back to the next scheduled meeting with suggestions for standards in regards to right-of-ways and setbacks for block walls, as well as security and standards for the block walls. For the mural project, Committee Chair Scrivner requested staff contact Caltrans and make sure they would be in agreement with such a project and what locations would be acceptable. Committee Chair Scrivner asked Jeanette Richardson to meet with him to discuss involvement from the private se-,tor for the mural project. Committee member Ken Weir asked staff to provide c! the next meeting a plan for deterring graffiti on the block and sound walls currently being built along the Highway 178 interchange. At the request of Committee Chair Scrivner, the discussion regarding traffic impact fees will be referred at the next Council meeting for discussion at the April Committee meeting. Dave Domohowski of Premier Planning and Cassie Daniels of HBA agreed with the decision. Planning and Development Committee February 7, 2008 Page 4 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS None 8. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 1:58:01 PM. cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council members S A K E R S F I E L D CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM February 29, 2008 TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director C\ SUBJECT: Freeway Walls The Public Works staff has researched various issues pertaining to freeway walls in the last few weeks: Access for maintenance (graffiti) of existing sound walls: Public Works staff met with the Manager of the South Region CalTrans District 6 Maintenance Division to discuss the SR99 sound walls in 5 different locations: 1. Between McKee and Hosking, west side 2. Between Panama and Hosking, west side 3. Between the Wilson Road overcrossing and Ming Ave, west side 4. Between Panama Lane and Pacheco Road, east side 5. South of White Lane against the north bound off ramp, east side. Staff has initiated a service agreement with CalTrans for the graffiti maintenance of wall 4 wherein CalTrans will pay the city for their services. Of the other walls, CalTrans will issue an encroachment permit as a part of the service agreement for the maintenance of walls 1 and 2 (developer walls). Wall 3 and wall 5 will be maintained by CalTrans. If a wall is to be maintained by the City of Bakersfield through an encroachment permit obtained from CalTrans, the wall can be placed directly behind the CalTrans right-of-way fence. If the wall is to be maintained by the City of Bakersfield without access from the freeway, then a minimum of 12 feet between the CalTrans right-of- way fence and the wall in question is necessary for the maintenance and graffiti trucks. Consideration must also be given for secure access from City streets, as GAGR0UPDAT\Memo\2008\Freeway Walls.doc well as turn-around space for those segments that are accessible from only one end. This 12' does not take into account any depth necessary for berms or landscaping. Cal Trans' Transportation Art Program (Murals): Cal Trans allows communities to paint murals or add sculptural artwork, either freestanding or on Cal Trans freeway walls, bridge abutments, bridge rails, etc. They have specific guidelines spelled out in Section 6 "Transportation Art" of Chapter 29 "Landscape Architecture" of the Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM). These guidelines apply only to walls under CalTrans' jurisdiction. As requested, staff has asked the CalTrans District 6 Transportation Art Coordinator to attend the Council Committee meeting on March 6 to discuss the applicability of these requirements to the developer walls, such as the Hosking to McKee wall. Briefly, if the artwork meets the Transportation Art Program criteria, the local agency is responsible for the cost of installing and maintaining the artwork for its projected lifespan. The local agency is also responsible for its eventual removal. CalTrans may require that the local agency provide bonds or other means of security to ensure maintenance, rehabilitation and removal of the art. Freeway wall at SR 178 and Fairfax: Councilmember Weir asked for information on the appearance of the wall on the south side of SR 178 at the Fairfax interchange construction project. A photo and an excerpt from the construction drawings for the wall is attached. Aesthetic Treatment for Sound Walls Along Freeways: CalTrans has authored a document— "SR99 Corridor Enhancement Master Plan" — which outlines some suggested, acceptable wall treatments for sound walls along this corridor. Staff is currently researching CalTrans requirements for these treatments. mps C: Reading File Freeway Walls file G:\GROUPDAT\Memo\2008\Freeway Walls.doc i� c .t 10 .¢ � _.. T .1 i DIST COUNTY ROUTE TER POST KII. L SNEET TOTA L iOTRI PROJECT No SyEC,S DES 1 cN H OB Ker 178 R9.4/R 12.1228 323 T, ;tlrilo 4-I0-07 REGISTERED CIVIL -4 9116-4 PLANS APPROVAL DATE EXPANSION JOINTS 80-3 CITY OF BAKERSFiELD SPACING 3-4 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE s,4 IV[ , �• WEAKENED PLAN£ BO-3 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA 93301 SPACING 3-2 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF OUADE & DOUGLAS OD 444 SOUTH FLOWER STREO, SUITE 3700 + LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 r N Th S7Me c waq or ooc Colffa No or Ys 2fflcws a apwws SWI vial Ae rasowav rar!Aa co wwws of okcrmvc wale of ws wan ow.. to f- To W to Me Cairms web s/1A pp rte Hlye/MwwalpffgQya W W z Z h W 11-1 CABLE J s y �. RAILING RW LOL —TYPE 1 F<�TrFR FG RETAINING 83-1 WALL 300 Inn 500 mm GUTTER (SEE DRAINAGE PLANS, ;: FRACTURED S) SHEET DD-4) RIB TEXTURE Conc BARRIER x :y (TYPE 60D) ;O BO-3 PERVIOUS w W 3-1 MATERIAL— ,n FG o REINF I CONCRETE i 50 CLR. c • I o'- I v g RW LOL TYPE 1 .RETAINING WALL 50 I ' TYPICAL SECTION I TYP)I i FRACTURED SURFACE MAX RELIEF 5 mm NO-SCALE PERMITTED LOCATION OF WEAKENED NOTE co PLANES AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR REINFORCEMENT AND DETAILS NOT SHOWN, N T10 SEE STANDARD PLANS. Q z F- r N W W $ W x TOP OF RW END OF RW N SMOOTH BAND EA FRACTURED x RIB TEXTURE Q300 Tbw ph=low 6ww pprawe foi TOP OF CONC BARRIER TYPE 600 BOTTOM OF - - -- ==._ , „ by , . ' FRACTURED ' , RIB TEXTURE 0 FG NOTE: NO HORIZONTAL JOINTS SHALL BF 8 PERMITTED IN FORMLINERS.`'" ELEVATION FRACTURED RIB TEXTURE NO SCALE 2 G ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS RETAINING WALL PLAN ,, _L WORK ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN RETAINING WALL No. Oi 20 USERN41 ;>i„efnendath SCALE AS SHOWN R-1 n„ n..sn r• yncnn. PIA,J,JI-4A ,4,-t9 tbeVCLOR-5-A r Part 3-Specific Project Development Procedures When approved by the Department, the name, identifying logo or symbol of the artist, local agency and/or financial sponsor may be placed on or adjacent to the transportation art and is not considered to be "text." The Department retains sole discretion for determining the appropriate size, content, colors and other elements of the artist and/or sponsor recognition. Logos and symbols for artist or sponsor recognition must be provided and maintained by the Permittee(s). Design Guidelines for Transportation Art Proposed transportation art must: 1. Be appropriate to its proposed setting. 2. Be in proper scale with its surroundings. 3. Not create a distraction to the motoring public (e.g., the proposed art should be large enough to interpret at highway speed, but not be so large that it demands attention from the motorist. 4. Be composed of materials that are durable for the projected life span of the project. 5. Be located where the Permittee(s) can safely perform required maintenance as specified in the encroachment permit and in conformance with the Department's procedures. 6. Be fully funded for design, installation, maintenance and removal by others for its projected life span. 7. Conform to provisions of the Outdoor Advertising Act. 8. Not be placed in median areas of controlled-access highways (freeways and expressways). 9. Not imitate, obscure or interfere with traffic control devices. 10. Not interfere with airspace above the roadway. 11. Not be placed within State highway right-of-way up on trees, rocks or other natural features. 12. Not adversely affect existing structures, drainage patterns or storm water runoff quality, landscaping, natural vegetation, or other planting. 13. Be located outside of the clear recovery zone (as defined in the Highway Design Manual). Transportation art must be placed as far from the traveled way or edge of roadway as is practical, with consideration for the visibility of the art. 14. Not make use of or simulate colors or combinations of colors usually reserved for official traffic control devices described in the AASHTO Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 15. Not include reflective or glaring surface finishes. 58 01/18/05 Project Development Procedures Manual Chapter 29-Landscape Architecture Section 6-Transportation Art 16. Not include illumination that impairs or distracts the vision of transportation system users. Other lighting may be permitted. Lighting may be allowed on structures only when approved by Structures, in accordance with current requirements. 17. Not include blinking or intermittent lights. 18. Not include moving elements (kinetic art) or simulate movement. 19. Not restrict sight distance. 20. Not include any form of advertising that would be in conflict with the Outdoor Advertising Act. 21. Not display text, flags, religious, political or commercial symbols. 22. Not include commercial symbols, except as allowed in "Artist and Sponsor Recognition." 23. Be designed to minimize ongoing maintenance needs. Department-approved protective graffiti coatings may be required by the Department. 24. Be consistent with Structures Maintenance inspection requirements, including: o Paint used on structures should not fill or obscure cracks. Latex or other flexible type paints may be used on concrete structures only with written permission from the Office of Structures Maintenance. o Painting of steel structures will only be permitted with written permission from the Office of Structures Maintenance and Investigations. o Painted art on concrete structures should avoid load-carrying, stress- bearing structural members including but not limited to bridge girders, soffits, columns and piers. Wing walls and abutments are preferred locations for painted art. o Artwork must not impair the necessary inspection of bridges, retaining walls and other structures. o To facilitate the Department's inspection access to structures, mural art may be placed on removable panels. o Chipping, blasting or in any way modifying existing concrete surfaces is prohibited. Submittal of Artwork Proposals A transportation art proposal should be supported by the local agency that has jurisdiction in the area where the artwork will be placed. The local agency will ensure that the proposal is developed in cooperation with the community immediately impacted by the artwork. The local agency will provide an opportunity for public comment on the proposed artwork. The responsible local agency will secure and document acceptance from the community immediately impacted by the artwork. Such community acceptance may vary, but must ensure that those most affected have an opportunity to express support or opposition to the proposal. Project Development Procedures Manual 01/18/05 59 Part 3-Specific Project Development Procedures The method of community review will be determined by the responsible applicant local agency, with guidance provided by the District Transportation Art Coordinator. The appropriate method for community review will depend on the nature of the artwork, and may range from developing a signed petition to conducting a noticed public meeting. The local agency will provide the Department an adopted resolution that describes: 1. The local agency's jurisdiction in the vicinity of the project site. 2. The date of public consideration and comment of the proposed art. 3. The local agency's approval of the artwork content. 4. The project's projected life span. 5. The local agency's commitment to ensure maintenance of the artwork, including timely graffiti removal/repair, and removal (or restoration) of the artwork at the end of its life span. 6. A schedule for commencing and completing project installation. The artist(s) and local agency will adhere to and remain in compliance with Department rules, regulations and any additional restrictions the Department may apply to the transportation art project, when working within the State highway right- of-way. The name, address and telephone number of each person working within the right-of- way to construct, maintain, rehabilitate or remove art will be provided to the Department as part of the permit application initially, and thereafter as changes occur. Transportation art proposals should be submitted to the District Transportation Art Coordinator. Transportation Art proposals will be processed by the Department through the encroachment permit process. Procedures for Processing Transportation Art Proposals The proposed site for installation of transportation art must be reviewed and approved by the Department for safety and environmental considerations prior to approval of an encroachment permit. Safety determinations affecting highway operation, maintenance or tort liability may be documented in a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER) or by other means. The Department has sole responsibility for approval of transportation art sites. The local agency and the Department must review and approve the proposed transportation art prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. Additional criteria and permit conditions may be applied to a project as determined appropriate by the District. Transportation art proposals will be reviewed for compliance with this policy. The approval of a transportation art proposal must be made with due consideration to safety (location, potential for motorist distraction, accessibility for maintenance, etc.), aesthetics, community support and maintainability. As a courtesy, the Department may suggest alternative locations when it is necessary to deny the issuance of an encroachment permit due to site conditions. 60 01/18/05 Project Development Procedures Manual Chapter 29-Landscape Architecture Section 6-Transportation Art Transportation art proposals must include: 1. The local agency adopted resolution in support of the art. 2. A resume of the artist's work and background. Project Development Procedures Manual 01/18/05 61 Part 3-Specific Project Development Procedures 3. A full description of the proposed artwork, including location, proposed life span, construction and installation techniques, details necessary to convey construction methods, and proposed materials, including, but not limited to, paint and protective coatings. 4. Specifications for proposed materials, including Material Data Sheets. 5. A scaled drawing and/or model. The Department may furnish necessary site data. 6. Construction schedule. 7. Project cost estimate. 8. Traffic control plan and provisions, when required. 9. Maintenance plan and schedule. Proposals that involve freestanding art, or involve the modification of existing Department structures must include design plans stamped by an appropriately licensed Engineer. These proposals will be submitted by the District Transportation Art Coordinator to the Office of Structures Maintenance and Investigations for review. Following review and approval by the District Transportation Art Coordinator, the proposal and approval documents will be submitted by the District Transportation Art Coordinator to the District Permit Engineer for processing. Permit applications for transportation art should be reviewed by District Landscape Architecture, Maintenance (including field maintenance and Headquarters Structures Maintenance and Investigations) Structures Design, Safety, Environmental and other appropriate units. The District Transportation Art Coordinator should send an informational copy of the art proposal, approval documents, permit and as-built information to the Headquarters Transportation Art Coordinator, LAP. If, at any time during the process, the District recommends any changes to or withholds concurrence on a project not yet approved, that proposal may be returned to the artist(s) for revisions. Once a permit is approved, no changes will be allowed to the art without prior written approval of the District Transportation Art Coordinator and the District Permit Engineer. 62 01/18/05 Project Development Procedures Manual The following documents were presented during the Regular Meeting of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting of March 6, 2008 L Innaft • B A K E R S F I E L D Development Services Department Stanley C. Grady, Director M E M O R A N D U M March 6, 2008 TO: STANLEY C. GRADY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR FROM: JAMES D. MOVIUS, PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: FREEWAY WALLS This memorandum pertains to the introduction of standards for walls developers construct with residential development adjacent to freeways. BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of walls separating residential subdivisions and freeways is sound attenuation. The height of the wall is determined by a noise study prepared by a qualified consultant. Typically, concrete block is used to construct these walls. The Committee requested information to improve the aesthetics/attractiveness of the walls and deter graffiti on the walls. Staff has provided three options for committee consideration. Option A: • Decorative concrete block or poured—in-place walls(examples could include split face block, heavily textured walls and/or pilasters) • 10 foot wide maintenance way for access Maintenance Needs: Ongoing Graffiti removal, weed control and trash removal (see table on following page). Option B: • Textured concrete block or poured-in-place wall with climbing vines to cover wall • Climbing Vines capable of attaching to wall • 10 foot wide maintenance way for access Maintenance Needs: Ongoing drip irrigation repair, minor vine maintenance, graffiti removal until vine coverage is obtained,weed control and trash removal (see table on following page). B A K E R S F I E L D Staff: Rhonda Smiley Zack Scrivner, Chair Rick Kirkwood Harold Hanson Ken Weir REGULAR MEETING NOTICE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield Thursday, March 6, 2008 1:00 P.M. City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor- City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA A G E N D A 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT THE FEBRUARY 7, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Update on Block Walls Along Freeways — Rojas/ Movius 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT SACouncil Committees\2008\08 Planning and Development\March\08 March 6 agenda.doc PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA FOR MARCH 6, 2008 MEDIA FAX CONFIRMATION 111 Ykr Seok t* Main - All Faxes I, x B- Newyok[& a \ G rDMNTms 7plfromlFAb F;wNumbeNEYn., R " YRw Aamunt Matta Una - AY 2/29/2008 2 21 PM Bruce Freeman 664-6030 1 Pgs 0 OK ,... MH 2/29/20082:21 PM Ron Brummett 32d-8215 �� 1 pgs 0 OK ..... ...'�""� � MN I$- i = 2/2920082:21 PM Steve DeBranch 323J006 1 pgs 0 OK MN Main Z 2/29/20082:21 PM Roger McIntosh 834.0972 1 pgs 0 OK MM --( PlaminS = 2/29/2008 2:21 PM Attn:Kim/Castle 8 Cooke 664.6199 1 pg. 0 OK MN -d Poar'rinc * 2/29/2008 2:21 PM Supervisor Barbara Patrick 868.3677 1 pgs 0 0K MN '---�Trash * 2/29/20082:21 PM Tom Carosepa 63b2693 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/20082:21 PM Mark Smith 862.5444 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/2008221 PM Scott Blunck 664.6042 1 pgs 10 OK MN t 2/2920062:21 PM Cathy Butler 3257319 1 pgs 0 OK MN 2/29/2008 2:21 PM John Fallgather 324.2323 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2129/20082:21 PM Carl Maeland 327.3283 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 212912008 2:21 PM Fred Portar 327.1065 1 pgs 0 OK MN. * 2/29/20082:21 PM News Editor-Bakersfield 395-7519 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2129/2008 2:21 PM Charles G.Wade 325.7814 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/2920082:21 PM Editor-Bakersfield News 324.9472 /pgs 0 O MN 229/20082:21 PM BIA 633.1317 1 pgs 0 OK MN t 2/29/20082:21 PM Government Affairs Dir. 6352317 1 pgs 0 OK MN ? 229/2008 2:21 PM Clear Charnel Radio 283-2963 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director-Channel 3 334-2685 1 pgs 0 O MN 2/292008 2:21 PM Opinion-Bakersfield Cal 395-7380 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director-Univision 334.2687 1 pgs 0 OK MN 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director-KBAK TV29 861-9810 1 pgs 0 OK MN Z 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director KERN/K... 326.0388 1 pgs 0 OK MM a 2/29/20082:21 PM Editor-El Popular 325.1351 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/2008 2:21 PM Beale Library 631-9439 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/20082:21 PM Editor-El Mexicalo 323.6951 1pgs 0 O MN * 2/29/2008 2:21 PM News Director-KWAC Sp...327.0797 1 pgs 0 OK MN 2/29/2008 2:21 PM News Director-KERO TV...323-5538 1 pgs 0 OK Ml, Z 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director-KGET TV... 2834843 1 pgs 0 O MN ,Z 2/292008 2:21 PM The Minority Construction 3239287 1 pgs 0 OK MN *' 2129/2008 2:21 PM News D'sector-KU2Z/K...328.7537 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/2912008 2:21 PM Kathy Eddy-County of Kern 868.3190 1 pgs 0 OK MN * 2/29/20082:21 PM News Director-Chamber... 327-8751 /pgs 0 O MN 2/29/2008 2:21 PM News Director-KLLY 95 F 393-1915 1 pas 0 OK MN t 4 7 fazes Ystetl 86 Fyp W loos tw x X60 * � 1RIO) B- Newyork[B, � 4 8 \ O ea s.DaNTina 7a/F'tam/F90 -FaxN1a16ar�At,.. � yka Sumx Asxam Matta llel�. Main -_All Faxes .{'d'e'll 2/292008221 PM David Bw Bakersfield 395-7519 1 .-d Commur * .. .... ................ ..... .... MM 2129/20082:21 PM Newer D'seGa-KID6; 283.2963 1 Pgs 0 OK .-......-MN BE,C J Legislate * 2/29/2008 2:21 PM News Director-KLLY 95 F 393.1915 1 pgs O OK t...�KW MN L-ct PlanniN .....Q Plamin; --�Trash PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, March 6, 2008 ATTENDANCE LIST Name Organization Contact: Phone/ E-mail Ccc.[o nt � U�� - �a� ��a►r-�C i M lAA OV 105 C th, 3 zt 3 -7 i8ob 5h erg C A-o 3 71 36 2e S� v� �•�+N GSwar' C Ut3 t',, W, 3;I G uw.AAS_ Lma• &ec 2;0- 31 JG M �0 �` � ; 1A 4 / Zo/-5176 f G Vb5 c IN ;cow