Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 6-84RESOLUTION NO. 6-84 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 290 (WIBLE NO. 5). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby resolves, finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan for providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 4 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 35000 thereof), and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive, and in some instances already are receiving, municipal services tax from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. That zoning upon annexation of Wible No. 5 will allow the same uses as presently existing in the county. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be if any, are: Richard R. Russell Acting City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 8. That the appropriate given mailed Notice of Hearing, Richard J. Oberholzer City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. .......... o0o .......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of January, 1984, by the following vote: Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROV/~, this 'MAYOR ~ the Ci~of Bakersfield 18th day of January, 1984 APPROVED as to form: C'iW¥-ATT~I~NE? of tile City of Bakersfield DP/AJS/bl 3. ANNEXATION NO. 290 WIBLE NO. 5 A parcel of land situated in the County of Kenn, State of California, being e portion of Sections 1 and 2, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. & M., more particularly described as follows: Beginnin~ North 00u corner of Corporate Beginning at a point on the west line of said Section ) which bears 00' 00" East a distance of 702.8 feet from the southwest said Section l, said point being a point on the existing Boundary of the City of Bakersfield, and the Point of for this description; THENCE (1) North 89° 56' 26" West a)ong the last named Corporate Boundary a distance of 50.00 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Wible Road; THENCE (2) along the feet; THENCE (3) THENCE (4) THENCE (5) Departing said Corporate Boundary North OO° O0' 00" East last named west right of way llne a distance of 617.82 South 89° South 19° South 05° 57' 33" East a distance of 718.07 feet; 39' 35" East a distance of 143.39 feet; )4' 38" East adistance of 301.90; THENCE (6) North 89° 56' 26" West a distance of'45.97 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 50 feet; THENCE (7) Westerly an~ southerly along the last named curve through a central angle of 2)4v 39' 19" an arc length of 187.322 feet; THENCE (8) South 02° 57' 45" West a distance of 193.86 feet; THENCE (9) South 89° 56' 26" East a distance.of 132.02 feet; THENCE (lO) South 00° 09' 19" West a distance of 75.50 feet to a point on the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (ll) Westerly and northerly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the Point of Beginning. Containing 11.33 Acres ± EXHIBIT "A" SERVICES Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection Streets: Construction Maintenance Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewage Other Water PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICE Aqency Which Presently ~heck Services Which ~ndicate How Services Pro- -Provides Service City Will Provide vided by C~ty will be Financed (i.e., general tax Upon Future ~ate or special assessment.) Annexation Date (specify) COUNTY X general tax revenue COUNTY X general tax revenue COUNTY ........ COUNTY X general tax revenue COUNTY X general tax revenue COUNTY X general tax revenue COUNTY .... private development COUNTY X general tax revenue N/A / X general tax revenue COUNTY X general tax revenue ON-SITE SUMPS (PRIVATE) X privately maintained CITY X user fees CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO.I LAFCKC #4 II. Po l i ce Fi re Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i,e, nearest fire station, library, etc.) All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the police station located on Truxtun Avenue. Serrano Station (No. 7) is located 0.8 mile to the west-southwest. Parks and Recreation Not applicable for existing commercial development. Library N/A Streets: Construction/Maintenance Sweeping Lighting The main corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue will provide necessary facilities and ser- vices to accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance personnel will be dispatched from the City yard on a regular basis for preventive maintenance and "as needed" repairs (this includes street maintenance, sweeping and lighting). Sewer City Treatment Plant No. 2. Other Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, rec. programs, etc.) 24-hour patrol provided. Emergency response time is estimated at 7 minutes. Fire protection is currently and will con- tinue to be available on a 24 hour basis with response less than 2 minutes. Annexation will not affect City service capability. There will be no reduction in the range or capacity of the City to provide the necessary Public Works services to the area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". The project is developed and served currently by Plant No. 2. III. What effectS, if any, .,ould annexation of this terri~..y have on existing level of city services {i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con- struction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. IV. Would city require any upgrading or change in facili{ies to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be responsible for financing? No. The primary structure. a Gemco department store has been operatinq for over one year, and three adiacent or nearby consisting of retail shops have been completed or are under construction in accord- ance with County P-D (Precise-Development) plans. Future construction (3 additional structures) will probably occur under County inspection prior to actual annexation. All !~provements (parking, li9hting, driveways, frontage, fire protection, drainaqe, etc.~meet City standards, Indicate and exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory. See attached Zoninq Map 12~-1. The entire properties are zoned-C-2 P-D (Commercial with Precise- Development). VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan designates approximately one-half of the site as Commercial with the northern half as Low- Density Residential. In order to accomplish PrezoninQ consistent with approved County development it will be necessary for the City to undertake a Land Use Element Amendment to Commercial use for the part not currently desigdated as Commercial. It is expected that a concurrent General Plan Amendment and pre-zoning ~rocedure will be submitted to the City Planninq Commission in April, 1984. An Initial Study wil-1 also be prepared proposinq an appropriate CEQA (environmental) document on both actions. EXHIBIT C VII. VIII. List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com- munity facilities, et. City police may be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol Services. The current City Police standard is 1.65 sworn officers per 1,000 population comparied to the County standard of 1.15 officers. It is estimated that the terriroty will benefit by reduced refuse service costs and sewer user charges. Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. There is little difference in taxes to be accrued to the County or City due to annexation. Proposition 13 set a one percent of market value limit on the general local government property tax. The existing representative property tax rate is 1.061215 percent per market value. With annexation theCity will assume payment for community service areas (CSA's) providing street lighting, fire hydrants and school crossing guards. The City's Municipal Improvement Bonds, Series A and B will add $8.72 per $100,000.00 of assessed value upon annexation. The present assessed value as listed by the County Assessors Office for land and improve- ments is $7,989,708.00 which would result in an additional tax of $696.54. List city tax rate(s). See above. How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000. Not applicable. EXHIBIT C ZONING MAP 123-1 SECI T.3OS. R27E. M.O.B.&M. KERN COUNTY CALIFORNIA LEGEND PROPOSED WIBLE NO. 5 ANNEXATION K£RN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Planning Commission Meeting of January 5, 1984 AGENDA ITEM 11. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF WIBLE NO. 5 ANNEXATION LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WIBLE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET NORTH OF MING AVENUE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE GEMCO COMMERCIAL DEVELOP- MENT. Two letters received by the City Council regarding annexation of the Gemco Commercial Development site located on the east side of Wible Road approximately 600 feet north of Ming Avenue. The letters from two of the three property owners (Bakersfield Investors and Ming-Wible Associates Limited Partnership, copies attached) indicates "no objection" to the annexation of'11.33 acres defined in Parcel Map 6617 (see attached map) with adjacent Wible Road right-of-way. The primary development is a 102,400 square foot single level Gemco Department Store. Three additional commercial struc- tures have been constructed at peripheral locations on the site. They have not been completed at this time (see notations on map). Two other buildings will be constructed along Wible Road frontage. A pad is available for a sixth building in the southwest corner of the site. There are 590 parking spaces. The total project area is 12.29 acres which includes a southern portion of the parking lot already within the City of Bakersfield. Three small sumps have been developed along the east project boundary to accommodate runoff. A masonry wall prevents through access to Kingsley Lane. Utilities are undergrounded. The property is designated for both commercial and low density residential use on the Bakersfield General Plan Land Use Element. A Land Use Element Amendment and prezoning should be initiated to reflect the existing and approved development of the site prior to annexation. The property is currently zoned C-2 P-D (Commercial with Precise-Development) by the County. The P-D plan for all improvements, including landscaping, was approved by the Kern County Planning Director in May, 1982 and the Parcel Map for seven lots was recorded on May 27, 1983. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the City Council initiate the annexation process for Wible No. 5 finding the proposal within both City of Bakersfield sphere of influence and General Plan boundaries and initiate a Land Use Element Amendment to reflect approved and existing commercial development. the Annexation Boundary 'ISite Being Pre DePartment Store City Limit Line T ~,Developeo ~ -, - Structure Sump AV£NU~ ~' ~'ARCEL MAP 15,960 f WIBLE NO 5 EXq!I]I'f "~ '