HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 36-84RESOLUTION NO. 36-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS PROCEEDING NO. 824,
ANNEXATION NO. 289, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAFCO
RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATION (BUENA VISTA
NO. 1).
a proposal was submitted to the
WHEREAS, Local
Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the
tion of territory to the City of Bakersfield designated as
tion No. 289 (BUENA VISTA NO. 1); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing
was held before the Commission on the 8th day of
WHEREAS, following said public hearing
Agency
annexa-
nnnexa-
upon said proposal
May, 1984; and
the Commission,
on May 8, 1984, adopted its Resolution Making Determination, being
Resolution No. 84-11, recorded in Minute Book 30 of said Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. Preliminary proceedings for annexation of territory
to the City of Bakersfield designated as Annexation No. 289 (BUENA
VISTA NO. 1) were authorized by the City Council of the City of
Bakersfield by action at a regular meeting thereof held on
December 21, 1983; Application for Annexation dated December 22,
1983, was transmitted to LAFCO; the Certificate of Filing of the
Executive Officer of the Commission shows that the proposal was
filed by him on the 27th day of December, 1983.
2. The distinctive short form designation assigned by
the Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is: "City
of Bakersfield Annexation No. 289 (BUENA VISTA NO. 1)."
3. The description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed is contained in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto, and incorporated in this Resolution as though
fully set forth herein.
4. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited
as determined by the Commission in its Resolution Making Determina-
tion.
5. The reason for the proposed annexation as set forth
in the proposal thereof submitted to the Commission is that the
owners of the affected territory receive, and in some instances
already are receiving, municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory to be annexed.
6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Wednesday, the 18th
day of July, 1984, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is hereby
fixed as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed
annexation where any owner of land within the said described
territory may appear before the council of the City of Bakersfield
and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Any
owner of land within the described territory may file a written
protest against the annexation with the City Clerk of the City of
Bakersfield at 1501 Truxtun Avenue at any time prior to the
conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation.
7. That the Negative Declaration as to this project is
hereby adopted and approved by the City of Bakersfield. The
project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
8. The land and improvements within the territory to
be annexed shall be liable for the general indebtedness of the
City existing at the time of annexation.
9. A certified copy of this Resolution shall forthwith
be transmitted to the Executive Director of LAFCO.
.......... o0o ..........
e
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of June, 1984, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: BARTON, CH;L~, C~N, MOORE, PAYNL, RAfrY, ROCKOFF
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT. COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINIt ~O: COUNC~LM~N~
CIT~ CLE~ a~ Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
MAYOy~the Ci/y of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
bl
ANNEXATION NO.
BUENA VISTA NO. i
A parcel of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County
of Kern, State of Calf£ornia. being a
Township 30 South Range .,, East, M.D.B. ~K~ M., more particu]~.t~]y
described as fellows:
Beginnin~ at the intersect ion of the south line of the north
30 feet of said Section ]8 with the east line of the west 555
of said Section ]8, sa~d intersection being a point on the
existing Corporate Boundary of thc City of BaKers!'ieid, ~nd
the Point of Beginning for this description;
THENCE (1) Easterly and south~r!y along the Corporate Boundary
of the City of Bakersfield ro a point which is the intersec'tion
of the east line of the west half of said Section 18 with the
south line of the north 1575 feet of the west ball of said
Section 18;
THE_"CE (2) Departing said Corporate Boundary westerly along
the last named south line to intersect the east line oi th.?
west 30 feet of said Section 18;
THENCE (3) Northerly along the last named east l~ne to int_r~,ct
the south line of the north 1038 feet of said
THENCE (4) Easterly along the last named souta ~Jne to intersect
the east line of 1he west 555 leer of :;aid
TIIENCE (5) Northerly along 1he last nam~.~d ea~<t
Point of Beginning.
Containing 85.04 Acres -+
EXHIBIT