HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 011-09RESOLUTION NO. ~~ -- Q 9
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 515
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TAFT HIGHWAY,
WEST OF STINE ROAD. (WARD 6)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located on the south side of
Taft Highway, west of Stine Road; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation to the City of
Bakersfield; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein,
located on the south side of Taft Highway, west of Stine Road.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government
Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to
the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the
affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the
territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore, the City
prepared an environmental document in accordance with State CEQA guidelines
and will use the environmental document for the proposed prezoning and
annexation.
/' J
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
not to have of 100% property owners consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese-
Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with
copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Pamela A. McCarthy
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with
Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of
Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309.
---------000
;,~:.
2 ~'~
=;
~-
C
~~ ~i'„_ :~'Ir1,i
1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and opted by the Council
of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on FEB 1 1 2~U
by the following vote:
AYES COUNCILMEMBER: ~6AW, BENHAM, WEIR, COUCH, kL4P1SAN, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
f~OES: COUNCILMEMBER: ~1~
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: I~l.fTl1~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ~~,~~ I~lal/YlSl7Yl
HARVEY L. HALL ,~
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
EXHIBITS: A Legal Description
B Map
C Plan for Services
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CM
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio CI of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
3
;,,
`,
~,..
t-=
<~~ ~--
0
EXHIBTT "A"
"ASHE NO. T'
ANNEXATION N0.515
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Being a portion of the North half of Section 3, Township 31 South, Range 27 East, and
the South half of Section 34, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian, in the County of Kern, State of California, more particulazly described as
follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 3, said point also being the
centerline intersection of Taft Highway (State Route VI-KER-l 19) and Stine Road
(County Road No. 205); thence North 89°04'33" West along the North line of said
Section 3 and centerline of Taft Highway {State Route VI-KER-119), a distance of
1,951.86 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence (1) South 00°55'27" West, to a point on the South right of way line of said
Taft Highway (State Route V I-KER-119), a distance of 30.00 feet;
Thence {2) North 89°04'33" West, along the said South right of way, a distance of
330.00 feet;
Thence (3) South 00°45'43" West, a distance of 1,259.78 feet;
Thence (4) North 89°lfl'22" West, to an angle point an the city corporate boundary, a
distance of 330.31 feet;
Thence (S) North 00°45'44" East, along said city corporate boundary, a distance of
1,260.34 feet to a point on the South right of way line of Taft Highway
(State Route VI-KER-119);
Thence (6) North 89°04'33" West, along the said city corporate boundary and said
South right of way line of Taft Highway (State Route V I-KER-119), a
distance of 660.4b feet to an angle point on the city corporate boundary;
Thence (7) North 00°28'48" East, along the city corporate boundary to a point on the
North right of way line of said Taft Highway (State Route VI-KER-119), a
distance of 60.00 feet;
Thence (8) South 89°04'33" East, along the city corporate boundary and said North
right of way line, a distance of 990.93 feet, to an angle point on the city
corporate boundary;
F~ ,~,
Page 1 of 2 ~ ~"~`
~~,
~_
a
_'al~~1,~,1_
Thence (9) Departing the city corporate boundary and continuing South 89°04'33"
East, along the said North right of way line, a distance of 330.30 feet;
Thence (10) South 00°SS'27" West, to the North line of said Section 3 and the center
line of Taft Highway {State Route VI-KER-119), a distance of 30.00 feet
to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 11.37 Acres
END OF DESCRIPTION
CHECKED by
KERN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE
~>~ rz / o~
Approved by
~~ ~
_.__.
Page2of2
`'
~r,
r, r ~'~
`_
~ C~
~_ ~.... ,','r_
~ a "~ s Z Q _~_ ~,
~ I ~ ~ ~'' ~ o Z z ~
I ~ o aeoa
O ~ ~ m Z _ .,awls ~
J O W o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~I
O I~ O ~ ~ ~ v }
Z I m ~' -° -- " o v a 3 ~i a o
o O~ ~ ~ a o ~ z ~_
~ Q ~ Q '~"~ 01 ~~ ~ ~~ U Q j ~ o ~ Q
~ O X W O ~ '~ ~ o ~ c ~ ~ U ~ oo I? W ~
~ ~ j w
l~ ~ Z ~ ~_ ~ ~ o ~n p ¢ ° z I U I ~
~ Z U ~ ~ W ~ ~ I a Q
Q N ~ j
~ ~ Q ~ - avowI3HSV. -I - U
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
\~
v!
l90L 'WV P~H N~I
------------------- ~ - I OYOl1 x/18
Q ~I~
.{- ~.
~~~ £ ~ ~ ~
~ I~fI € ~
W N
^~ ~
Q ~~ 4 ~ ~~~,' ~ O ~ ~V
~ ~~ '~ ~ I
I'~I
~ ~~ I ~$ N W
I ~
I
,~ ...
~ / __ ,ecesz~ n~.ersr.oos
i~ I
~ ~i ~
j ~ ~ ~ -.
00 ~ ~ ~~ ¢~ ~~..
v I
m ~ ~ ~ \~ @O ,rf~OBZI 3.-r.Sr.00N
~ ~ G{
y ~ e ~.
~ ~' , g~~
~ ~ ;; ~~
m ~ ; !
~. i ~
I ;.
\ ~~
i ,~~
~..
i ;~
i
i
~ ,~ ~ o
~p~~~
~\ I ~ ~ ZICpN~p
ww ~
i v ~ ~ O
~' m N Q
~S j ~
~ I
I~
(QQ! nIV Ppkl ~R~)
-- ---------------'---~--- OVOk13~BV ---------------------------------'---'----
~;
ct
f+=
~_
C7
~ti
~n o
Oz
Z ~
Z °
O~
Q~Qs
WQ
Z
Z
Q
W
V
W
N
O
a
0
LL
Z
Q
J
a
w
m ~
-a
m ai
._ ~ ~
:° ~ cn u~ v~ uS w
a ~ ~
>
a ~ '~ z z z z ~ ~ ~ z z
~ •~ N » » ~ ~ ~ ~ » p
~? W N W
' W
' W
' W Q
O W Q
O Q
O W W 5
~ ~ p Q om Q ~ W ~ ~ ~
(A P ~.
m
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
O 3
j ~
x c J J Q ~
JW ~ Q ~
JW Q ~
JW J J W W W
_
a '~
~ m °~
~ ~ J
Q
~ J
Q
~ Q
~ Q
~ Q~
~ j Q~
~ Q~
~ .
Q
~ Q
~ Iwi LWi twt.
~
~-
ap ~-
p m ~
~ ~,
w
w
w
wp z
ww -
~ z
ww Z
ww w w ~ ~ ~
o
= ~ o a~ z z z zz z> a z> z> z z w w w
a »-• ~ N w w a w w~
' ww ~ ww ww w w cn c~ cn
~ U co C~ C~ Z C7 ~u.
C C~~ m C~~ C7~ C~ C7 ~ > >
U
.`
~_
p
U p
V O W_
s c}o _
p ~
N w
'
O O N N a
w
N
~
' 7 U
~
w
w N
a Y
°'
F-
H m
~ x ~ fn O
.~c
N a O c ~ ~ Z
p }} ~ mo Q }
F- ~ ~ }
~ }
f- ~ ~
F_-- I
- _ _ _ _
U ~ ~Q U U U U U U Z U U U U U U U
N J
~ O
> R'
O ~
n. a
p
Q w
~ ~
v _
= ~
H
a w
Y
l
- Q
L
rr
rr W
W
r ~
r ~
rr
rr
~ m
Q
rr
U ~ Z Z ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z
c
°~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a
i 0 0 0 2 0 O Q O 0 0 0 0
Q fA U U U fn U U Z U U U U U U
c
0
~.
U
~
W
O U O C O O ~
U ~ ~ U ~
~ ~ a o . u~ ~Q- c cv
'~ ' .«
~ ...
~ ' °~ t o 3 ~
w
(n ~
d m
d ~
._
J o
d ~
._
L.L ~..
fn 0
U ca
~ 3
(n
J
L.L a~
f/1
~
O
V
m
W
r'• , Y
~: ~
~d^
{ ~i
~_
CJ
vi
_U
Z
vi upi
~' cv.Q~
U
~ t0 3 ~
U 'O Vl ~
N ~ d ~
oU~yo
£-3~0
a N ~._
v~y- o a~
vp~•Uc
>'V U N O
Na
N ~ c O N
.o
3
L
U
L
3
U
.~
N
0
c
0
ai
.Q
m
U
a
a
ca
C
O
L
3
o v
t0 •~ N
N ~
O N ~
C V N
~ L ~"
c 3 c
0 0 ~ .-.
O ~ ...V.,
O_
~~~
..-' +' 'O
~ U •~ t0
_ O O
•>cya
Q'N U~ O
upio~-~
~J~3u,
a
V) OD
L (V N N
~ •U C
N ~'-p
f0 f0 ;~' cU
O
O A O
to
N J L (p
~,., .. _ .
C~ '~ N O ~ O O `~ O
O -
'~_ ~
X
~ ii
~
3 0
L p
~ .. o
N
> O ~ >~ C
7 j~ H O C
a?a
tuQ ~c
t~ O
U ov
cnc a,~N
<aZcv
'0 ffl i 0 "a N O ~' U O c
EN NU ccu Y?~
o pNc
c ~
>, ca
O
~~ O~
U ~
o NQL
Zrn~ t•U N
"~~ 3
C O
` 'p
N j N v,
Y L
~ N N C_ O
N~ C .~ 7
C a m N
N
O N '~ -
C ~
U ~ •• j~~ N N
~ o•a Q. .,upi p
oN •
o~E ~uNim axi aXi ~n
vi ~-~ .w c a ~ ~ aov ~ ~ o ;~ ~ •
~
N N_
Q W N _
O W N O~
L~ U~
O p >, O C
C O L V
Q V
d Y
U
o ~ c~ ~ c o a~•~ x~ ~ ~"•3 ~ ~ o
ao N o o~ c ~
rn ~ co ~ -a N
3 • o ~ c}a
N O X .4? 0- X~ o.
~ p N N p N O •V ~ ~ ~
` LCC Ica •X~ spa ~p"N -p ~ >'
'
N N E LL tC0 U W~ F- ~ N H- ~ (n a
Q Q -
•
U
~ ap p p c rn U 'O N O N c N N N ~
~ 00 ~ 7 A 7 f0 E N V a O O (4 N
.r ~
U N ~, ~ N
U ._ ~ f0 ~
3 O N ` ~,,
U N '~ N ~, ++
C A N L
U
~ ,
O ~ ~ >
Q
~' ~ ~ ~ ~ N a.+
C
C ~ C
' ~ r>'+
~~
X O
`
C d U V- O
w- ~ N N
+O' ~' 'a ~ ~
''
0 0~
C
U
+J
y Q ~ Q~
~ Oy
° o ~ 3
~ ~ ~ 3 L
I- ~o
~
~c~o ~ no ~~ ~o• v ~a~?, a~ >,
~o
o~ ~~.a
~ 3ca
ago ~~~m
C9m•pv ~~•~
3E~
~ ~
-o~
a c
c
> ~
~.. N ~
~~~
a
~ ~}'
~~ Z~ ao
H
c~ a~'x.E
m~X Y
m pQ
a~
n
Q o ~
i .
c O
n ~ a~
N M p N ~ ~ `
~ d
~a o•~N --° ~' ~~ o ~'~p ~ ~upi
L~ Z ~' N L ~ C L
Z U ' O
E N
~p N
cU p
O
~
~
~ ~° a
a ~o rn
= N
Y m
p
y N
3
~-
~- Y
O W~ p
c
U U N
p A
~
_
U N
N~
C~ cnHooi
' U M m
O ~
) c
~ ~
c
N
N~ p N~c~
~
U N
~
N ~~
~
~, ( t0 m N
f0 ~ U C~ O
O N O O
O
.D >'~ U~
'
Z O Z~ U O
' t
q ~
N t h C ~ y-~
N X a N c
c Z >, N t. O fC 3
Z
N ~ •~ c 3
o
$ c ~
~},
~ c O ~
.. 0-
a c) w~ ~
~
.. N
Q N c
~ O cu •u;
N ~ f0 V
~ 'a ~ E
Q p
~
O ~ ~
v
Z +-' C U
fB •N C c
a+ ~
rL-. N "~ N «+
t0 C V
N f0
•~m~ ~ ~~ ~ w
~ a~
N U ~
' a vE ~
~ '3.=~ ~~
O C 'L' ~
O
~ ~ p _
~~ NQ W •N ~
N
U~ ~
Z N N C O"~ ~~ >
O U
o c v,
. •3~ p N
U~ ~ ~ p v
~ O~~•~
v a~~
. ~ c N~
~
o
0 •0 3 U
3 G Q ~
~ .3 c~ T ~ ~
L~~ L ? ~
/
woo u~a~oa ~ ww
I
~-•>a~ /
~c~~3 dam ~~ ~~
V4?c
c ~>.~~ y
~ Q woN
' NcaYp w__3 w~ wa
N
~ w ao o
D O S a
m ~ °'
~
= O z° ~L
O
m 3 ~~
W O O Q~ I=-
••
0 0 •
a~ E ~I
wa ao Q
a ~ ~
cn 3~ o rn
a~
v o_~ ~•c p
cnzz c 3.3 OU
c:,
~_
c: ,
,: i r,
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc The annexation of this territory will have minimal effect on the near term level or capability of
the City to provide needed services. Upon future development, additional police officers would
possibly be required to maintain the current level of city service. The planned development
including public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future
maintenance responsibility of the City but should not affect the existing level of service.
2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing?
Private development provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No
upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the territory as RS
jResidential Suburban) 20-A (Agricultural 20 acre. min. lot size) Zone and A (Agricultural) Zone.
4. Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The Citv
adopted County zoning with Ordinance No. 3819 keeping the RS (Residential Suburban) 20-A
(Agricultural 20 acre. min. lot size) Zone and A (Agricultural) Zone
5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police
should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. Parcels
within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available City sewer system lines. The
present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to
independent companies. No special assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection,
street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's incorporated area.
City government also provides increased political representation for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area (061-006) equals 1.074276% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated
percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the
County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 2008-2009 County
Auditor-Controllers 2008 Lien Date).
7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain.
No the tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existing annexation area is
not subject to a Williamson Act Contract.
-3-
~,
r_
C:\DOCUME-1\dlewis\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Exhibit C.DOC ~ - `'
~- t.:~