HomeMy WebLinkAboutJAN 29 MBHCP MINUTES
Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
Implementation Trust Group
MINUTES
Agenda Item 1
January 29, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.
County of Kern Administrative Center
Fourth Floor Hearing Room
1115 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
IMPLEMENTATION TRUST GROUP TO RECONVENE
Implementation Trust Group: Ted James – Kern County (Chairman)
Stanley Grady – City of Bakersfield (Secretary)
Julie Vance – CDFG Advisory Member
Tim Kuhn – USFWS Advisory Member
Donna Carpenter – Public At-Large Advisory Member
ROLL CALL: Present: Ted James, Stanley Grady, Julie Vance, Tim Kuhn,
Donna Carpenter
Absent: None
STAFF: Bruce Divelbiss, Jennie Eng, Mitch Van Wyk, Pamela Elisheva, Cecelia
Griego, Melanie Dunwoody, Dana Cornelius
*
CONSENT AGENDA/OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT:
*
1. Approve minutes for the MBHCP Implementation Trust Group meeting of
October 30, 2008.
*
Purchase of Habitat Mitigation Land (new acquisitions):
2. For each property
listed below, staff recommendation is as follows, with the specific purchase price
recommendation listed with the property below:
(1) MAKE FINDING THAT THE ACQUISITION IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
PURSUANT TO §15313 OF CEQA; (2) UPON (A) SELLER’S SIGNING OF A
MEMORANDUM OF SALE AND ESCROW; AND (B) STAFF’S RECEIPT OF
DOCUMENTATION FROM CDFG INDICATING CDFG’S INTENT TO ACCEPT
TITLE TO THE PROPERTY AT THE CLOSE OF ESCROW, AUTHORIZE CITY
OF BAKERSFIELD FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ISSUE WARRANT IN AMOUNT
SUFFICIENT TO COVER PURCHASE PRICE; ESCROW COSTS; INCENTIVE
INTEREST OF .583% OF SALE PRICE PER MONTH UNTIL THE
RECORDATION OF A MEMORANDUM OF SALE AND ESCROW; REAL
ESTATE TAXES FOR PERIOD WHICH THE MBHCP IS RESPONSIBLE; AND
PRO RATA LIABILITY INSURANCE UNTIL THE CLOSE OF ESCROW, IF
APPLICABLE, TO TICOR TITLE COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING
THE SELLER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SIGNED MEMORANDUM OF
SALE AND ESCROW; (3) WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF
ESCROW, TRANSFER THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT TO CDFG FOR
ENHANCEMENT; AND WITHIN 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF
ESCROW, TRANSFER THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT TO CDFG FOR
ENDOWMENT, and;
(a) APN 046-090-01 (19.55 acres) — being a portion of W ½ of Section 14, T
25 S, R 23 E, MDM, County of Kern; located in north Kern County, on the
south side of Garces Hwy approximately 1 ½ miles west of Wildwood
Ray H. Fitzgerrell Family Trust and
Road. The property is owned by
George F. Peters Trust
and the proposed purchase price is $48,875.
*
3. Transmittal of Quarterly Report to the MBHCP Implementation Trust Group -
RECEIVE AND FILE.
*
4. Transmittal of Memorandum to the MBHCP Implementation Trust Group to
report habitat trust fees adjusted for inflation - RECEIVE AND FILE.
*
5. Presentation of Budget for Fiscal Year 2008/2009 to the MBHCP
Implementation Trust Group - RECEIVE AND FILE.
The hearing was opened up for comments.
Member Grady moved, seconded by Member James, to approve Consent
Agenda as read.
Motion carried by group vote.
6. Request by Trust Group Member Stanley Grady, City of Bakersfield, to discuss
possible action regarding interim passage of title of acquired mitigation lands to
the MBHCP Implementation Trust Group and/or other approved agencies other
than CDFG or USFWS.
Ms. Eng commented that this is a continuing discussion that the group is having,
pointing out that Ms. Vance has indicated that she would like to make inquiries in
her department related to possibilities available to the Trust Group. Ms. Eng also
commented that Staff was going to prepare a letter for signature to the State
requesting additional information on how to proceed based on Ms. Vance’s
information.
Ms. Vance shared that they have made some inquiries with Sacramento as to the
feasibility of funding of land agent positions to help focus only on Metro HCP
acquisitions, which was sort of tied into this overall discussion of whether a
transfer to the City would be necessary, or whether there would be a way to
expedite processing of these lands. Ms. Vance stated that they have heard that
it would definitely be feasible and this would probably be a good time to pursue
that given some of the budget cuts. Ms. Vance commented that the question for
the City is the extent of the commitment that could be feasible, and specifically
what kind of funding and duration.
Mr. James responded that from the last discussion on this item there was an
issue with regard to the need for a full time position, and it was decided probably
not. He questioned how you pay for a part time position if it is feasible.
Ms. Vance responded that they might be able to do contract for a limited
duration, which was brought up as an option when they spoke with Sacramento.
Mr. James inquired whom the discussions were with in Sacramento, to which Ms.
Vance responded that the discussions have been just with the department,
however, the position would have to have processing authority, and specifically
there would be one land agent who would take care of everything for those lands.
Mr. Grady inquired if there is a way to get information on time and costs, as far
as what is being paid for an agent, and how many cases are still there, and how
long would it take to process those cases. Ms. Vance responded that it might be
based on a per case cost average, because it takes the same amount of time to
process a one acre as it does 100 acres.
Mr. James commented that he would want to make sure that this is not just with
the Department, but that it is with Wild Life Conservation Board as well.
Mr. Divelbiss stated that if they want to move more expeditiously then the next
meeting they could convene a special meeting to consider such a contract. Mr.
Grady concurred stating that they could have their Staff work with Ms. Vance to
put together some numbers that would be available for discussion at the next
meeting.
No action was taken on this item.
Mr. Grady pointed out that the other piece of this was the interim passage of title,
and Julie’s comment related to something. Mr. James stated that if they can
resolve the staffing situation, there is no need for interim passage of title. He
stated that this would be the County’s first goal to address that issue. Mr. Grady
commented that if there is no interest on the County’s part in the passage of title
to the Trust Group, then perhaps they don’t need it on the next agenda, and they
can just pursue the contract issue. Mr. James concurred.
Ms. Eng clarified that the meeting with Jeff is Jeff Single of Fish & Game, to
which Mr. James confirmed.
7. Kern County Tax Assessor’s notification of “Escape Assessment” on the Netz-
Petttegrew acquisition (APN 046-110-06).
Ms. Eng stated the correct APN for this is 046-110-03. She explained that in
December ’08 the Trust Administrator received a notice of proposed Escape
Assessment from the Kern County Assessor stating that the property value for
the referenced parcel would increase from $20,000 to $77,221, which is a
property value increase of over $57,000. She further explained that in that letter,
it indicated that the property taxes would also increase from $225 to $871.73,
which is an increase of nearly $646. In the standard operating process for the
Trust Group, they sign a Memorandum of Sale and Escrow with the property
owner, and with this particular property it was signed in January of ’06, and they
are waiting for the Wildlife Conservation Board to review the title and accept it on
behalf of the State of California. Further, as part of that Memorandum, the Trust
Group takes the responsibility for paying the property taxes while it is under
review at the State. Ms. Eng stated that currently they are paying taxes on 116
property transactions that cover over 4,900 acres of habitat land waiting
clearance by the State to accept title. The consequences if the Assessor pursues
this avenue on all the habitat lands they have waiting for review, there would be a
significant fiscal obligation of the Trust Group. She pointed out that the mitigation
fee does not account for this tax increase, and they are now waiting for a letter
from the Assessor regarding their rights for informal and formal appeal process.
Ms. Eng stated Staff is bringing this to the attention of the Trust Group for
direction.
Mr. James inquired if she has had any dialogue with the Assessor’s Office, to
which Ms. Eng responded she has not directly spoke with them, as they are
waiting for the official letter so they can pursue appeal rights.
Mr. James stated he could contact the Assessor and chat with them and try to
get a general read related to this. Mr. Divelbiss suggested that Mr. James and
himself make joint contact with the Assessor’s Office as he has a contact name.
Divelbiss inquired if Staff has a clue as to what they discovered that they weren’t
previously taxing. Ms. Eng responded that it was a surprise, pointing out that the
Notice originally went to County Property Management and was sent over to
them. She said this is the first time that anyone has seen this type of letter on a
habitat property.
Mr. Divelbiss pointed out that it is his understanding that an Escape Assessment
means they’ve discovered something on the property they were unaware of. He
suggested that the question be posed as to what they found out that they didn’t
know before.
Pamela Elisheva, Trust Administrator Staff, stated that she believes what has
happened is that somehow they are gathering information on what we proposed
to pay once the escrow is finalized through the Memorandum of Sale, and that is
what is reflected in the increase of the assessment. Therefore, while it was being
assessed at a different property value before, it’s being based on what they
propose to pay once the escrow settles. She pointed out that all they have paid
the seller is through the Memorandum of Sale and escrow, and not the actual
escrow costs, as title has not passed.
Ms. Carpenter inquired that since property values have devalued so much, is it
possible to do the converse when they meet with the assessor.
Mr. James inquired if this is the only property that this has come up on. Ms. Eng
responded that this is the only property as of right now. Mr. James commented
that the question of decreased value can be raised with the Assessor.
Mr. Divelbiss offered that the Assessor is an independent elected official, and
while they might be willing to listen to reasonable arguments, they will do what
they do without a lot of guidance and direction from anyone, including this Board.
Mr. James agreed, but commented that it is worthwhile to have dialogue with
them.
Mr. James recommended that Mr. Divelbiss and himself make a contact and
come back to the next meeting for further discussions.
Public Presentations
8. This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the
Implementation Trust Group on any matter not on this agenda but under the
jurisdiction of the Implementation Trust Group. The Implementation Trust Group
members may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They
may ask a question for clarification and make a referral to staff to report back to
the Implementation Trust Group at a later meeting. Also, the Implementation
Trust Group may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a
future agenda. Speakers are limited to two minutes. Please state your name
before making your presentation.
Mr. Unger stated he had some comments with regard to Item Number 6. Mr.
James allowed his brief comments. Mr. Unger commented that part of the
reason to have the HCP is to recover species, and the idea is to get little chunks
of land here and there and everywhere and then stick them together that the
species can have a habitat. He stated that if all the little chunks of land are under
various jurisdictions, it is just one more coordination that has to be made, and it
might be easier to leave all the little chunks of land in the pervue of the Fish &
Game so the City and County don’t have to coordinate. He stated that he does
not see the advantage to the City or the County of the Implementation Trust
Group of having title to land.
Implementation Trust Group Member Announcements or Reports
9. Mr. James inquired if they are going to be getting Form 700. Ms. Eng responded
that they will be delivered early next week.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
CLOSED SESSION
10. The Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan Implementation Trust
Group will hold a closed session (Government Code §54956.8) to confer with
and grant authority to its negotiators (Jennie Eng, Mitch Van Wyk, and Don
Anderson) regarding the purchase of real property. The closed session involves
the property identified below:
a) Kern County APN 184-090-24 & 37 (approximately 730 acres); portion of
Section 4 and 5, T 31S, R 26 E, MDM, generally located east of Interstate
5, south of Taft Highway. The land is owned by Buena Vista Dairy, LLC.
b) Various properties in Kern County Townships 25 and 26S, Range 22 E,
MDM
RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSION
No reportable action from closed session.
The next meeting was scheduled to March 5, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
ADJOURN
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 11:13 A.M.
Dana Cornelius, Recording Secretary
Jennie Eng, Trust Group Administrator
Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan