HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 82-84RESOLUTION NO. 82-84
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 291
(ROSEDALE NO. 2).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution
as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization
Act of 1977 (Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 4 of the Government
Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 35000
thereof), and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for
annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organiza-
tion are that the owners of the affected territory desire to
receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the
City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be
given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
6. That zoning upon annexation of Rosedale No. 2 shall
be considered in separate proceedings, including analysis of
environmental impacts, and that the environmental impacts of the
annexation will be evaluated by the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County, as lead agency, during its proceedings.
7. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing,
if any, are:
George A. Caravalho Richard J. Oberholzer
City Manager City Attorney
City of Bakersfield City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun AVenue 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for Applicant)
8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October, 1984, by
the following vote:
AYE$~ COUNCILMEN: BARTON, CHILDS, CHRISTENSEN MOORE, PAYNE, RATrY, ROCKOFF
NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~
ABSENT~ COU~'~CIb%'~EN: ~ ~ 0
CiT~ CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APP,~O~,ED this 3,rd day of October, 1984
~/; , ,,-~/
MAYOR/~f the City of-~ersfield
APPROVED as to form:
/~--~/J of Bakersfield
nP/bl 3.
ANNEXATION NO. 291
ROSEDALE NO. 2
~ parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 27 East,
~I.D.B. & M., more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the south quarter corner of said Section 23, as said
corner is shown on Parcel Map No. 3584 recorded September 22, 1976
~n Parcel Map Book 16 at page 163, in the Office of the Kern County
!(ecorder, said corner being a point on the Existing Corporate Boundary
of the City of Bakersfield; thence North 00032'47" East along the
last named Corporate Boundary and the West line of tile Southeast
quarter of said Section 23 a distance of 54.02 feet to the True Point
of Beginning for this description.
I'hence (1) Departing from the Existing Corporate Boundary of the City
of Bakersfield North 00°32'47" East a distance of 500.39 feet;
I'hence (2) South 89°08'13" East a distance of 692.51 feet tea point
on the west right of way line of State Route VI-KER-99, said poini
also being a point on the Existing Corporate Boundary of the City of
Bakersfield;
Thence (3) Souther]y and Westerly along the last named Corporate
Boundary to the True Point of Beginning.
CONTAINING 6.534 ACRES +
EXHIBIT "A"
L
P
11~8
PARCEL MAP NO ~731
PARCEL MAP NO 3584
~,SER¥ICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Malntenan~e
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Other
Water
A%ency Rich Presentl~ Check Services Which Indicate }Iow
Provides Service City Will Provide:t vided by City will be
: Financed (i.e., §en~ral tax
Upon Future rate or special assessment.)
Annexation Date .
(specify]
COUNTY I General Tax Revenue
COUNTY X General Tax Revenue
COUNTY N/A General Tax Revenue
COUNTY
~ General Tax Revenue
C____~ITY X General Tax Revenue
COUNTY X General Tax Revenue
New streets will be constwucteo Dy
COUNTY N/A private deyelopment deeded to city
COUNTY X General Tax Revenue
Upon
£OUNTy X Development General Tax Revenue
Upon
NO SERVICE X Development General Tax Revenue
upon On site storm drainage system will be
NO SERVICE Development
~ constructed by developer; maintenance
of pub]lc stom dcQipag~ syste~ & flood
Upon ~ootr~f sxstem wlfm De rinanceo with
N/A (Septic Tank) X Development
User Fees/Special Assessment
Upon Private development pays caO'ital cost,
N/A {on w~ll} X Development user fees for individual service
' LAFCKC #4
EXHIBIT "C"
. applicant city.
Police
Pa~ks and Recreation
Library
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
All police services in the City of Bakers-
field are administered through the
City Police Dept. located at the SW cor. of
Truxtun Ave. & 16th St. About 1 mi. SE of
Station No. 1 (Central) is about 1 mi. to th(
East located at 2101H Street
Beach Park is located'+ 0.5 mile to the
information, when ~,pplicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
Service (i.e.,street sweeping, response t!me
for3merienc¥ services, rec. proRrams, etc.)
24-hr. patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.5 minutes or less,
Construction/Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
N/A
Other
Water
The city corporation yard on Tru×tun Ave. W.
of Frwy. 99 will provide necessary facilities
personnel, services to accommodate public wot'
efforts. Maintenance personnel will be dis-
patched from the city yard on a regular basis
for preventive maintenance & 'as needed"
repair includes streets, construction/main-
tenance, sweeping & lighting.
Connection to city sewer system may be on
Pierce Road near Rosedale Hwy. & Frwy 99
interchange or at the So. end of Camino Del
Rio Ct. Effluent will'be~reated by City
Waste Water Treatment Plant #2
This area is within the city's Fairhaven
Water District & will be served by city wateF
upon its annexation.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hr. basis
with response time of 3 minutes or less. The
annexation will not affect city fire service
capacity.
All city parks awe open to public at reasonable
hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range or capacity
of the city to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing l~vel
of city services [i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or c~n-
struction of new facilities, ~tc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect the near term level or capability of the city to provide needed services.
IV.
Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terri-
tory [roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be
responsible for financing? As development occurs, the develop~provides aod~k ._
pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the city {See Planninq Commission..
Resolution No. 66-84 for detail of conditions recommended/.
indicate ~nd exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory.
m~p 1~2-23. The existing zone is M-3 (General Manufacturinq).
tion will be C-2 (Commercial).
See attached f~Qning
Zoninq Upon ~nnexa-
VT.
:ndicate and exylain proposed prezoning in area. [List effects on present
9n property, etc.) The Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (GPA 2-84.
Seqment I) desiqnates this area for Commercial, any future development in this
.territory will be consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, the area will
be prezoned C-2 in accordance with the General Plan. The prezoninq will have
little effect on present land use and is consistent with adi~cent commercial
developments in the city.
VII.
L}st city services that art- will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emer£ency response time, use of com-
mtmity facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely
manner than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrnl ~orvirpq Cidfront City
Police standard is 1.65 sworn officers Per 1,000 PoPulation compared to £ount~
standard 1.i5. Upon development, the area will be served with cit,v watP~ewe~___
which will provide reqidents with horror firP prntortinn an~ hoalfh maintPnanqe
facilities.
VIII. Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes:
A.List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existinq tax rate in the area equals 1.025655
percent of assessed market value. This represents th~ total prnp~rty tax rate.
When annexed, aPProximately 30% of the total property tax of tho ar~a will ~ccur~
_.to the City, and the balance, to the County for providing ~ealth and Social q~rvicps.
B. List city tax rate(s). 1.034373 Percent of assessed r~arket valt~o which inch~d~q
value.
C.How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of
~50,OOO If a house with a market value of $50,000 is annex~d tn thP City, the
owner would have to pay the city bonds equal 0.008718 percent of thP aqqAqqAd val[)~
of the property (or $4.34), Other taxes accure to City and Cntmty will h~ th~ ~amo
as explained above. However, the proposed development of the property iq rnrnm~rr~a_l.
PROPOSEDROSEDALE NO. 2ANNEXATION
ZONING MAP 102-23
~rC?ION 23 T.2.~J$. R27E. M.D. 6.~M.
K[R# COUNTY C~-LI FOR NIA
LEGEND