Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 44-83RESOLUTION NO. 44-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MAKING FINDINGS THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE AND ORDERING THE TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS PROCEEDING NO. 792, ANNEXATION NO. 285 (RIO BRAVO NO. 2), ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. WHEREAS, Resolution of Application No. 72-82, dated July 7, 1982, was submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annexation of territory to the City of Bakersfield designated as Proceeding No. 792, Annexation No. 285 (RIO BRAVO NO. 2); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon said held before the Commission on the 28th day of December, was and proposal 1982; WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Commission, on December 28, 1982, adopted its Resolution Making Determination being Resolution No. 82-22, recorded in Minute Book 29 of said Commission; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 1983, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, adopted its Resolution No. 22-83, initiating proceedings for annexation of the said territory to the City of Bakersfield, and setting Wednesday, the 9th day of March, 1983, at the hour of 7 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter could be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed annexation where and when any owner of land within the hereinafter-described territory could appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should not be annexed and the owners of land within the said territory were duly informed of their right to file a written protest against the annexation with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly con- ducted by and before the City Council in all respects in accordance with Resolution No. 22-83, on March 9, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. In accordance with Section 35229 of the Government Code, it is hereby found regarding the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn by owners of land and improvements, at the conclusion of the public hearing, as follows: No written protests against the said annexation were filed with the Clerk of the City of Bakersfield at any time prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on the proposed annexation. 2. The description of the exterior boundaries of the territory annexed is contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated in this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That the said territory designated as Proceeding No. 792, Annexation No. 285 (RIO BP~AVO NO. 2), and described herein, and every part thereof, is hereby ordered annexed to the City of Bakersfield. 4. That the Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this resolution ordering a change of organization, along with any required remittance to cover the fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County. 5. That the executive officer of the Commission is hereby requested to prepare and execute a certificate of completion and make the filings required by Chapter 4 of the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 and record a certified copy of the certification of completion with the recorder of Kern County, with the surveyor of Kern County and with the Clerk of the City of Bakersfield. .......... o0o ......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote: CITY CLERK ar~ Ex cio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED ~his 9th day of March, 1983 / ~ ,r,..~,~. .... .- . . MAY~ of the City of Bakersfield // APPROVED as to form: CIT~ ATTORNEY of the ~ity of Bakersfield RJO/bl 3. 3/4/83 :~NNE~e~TION NO. 285 RIO BRAVO NO. 2 A parcel of land sithated in the County of Kern, State of Califoraia, being a portioa of Sections 15 and 23, Township 29 South, Range 29 East, H.D.B. & M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Section 23, said corner being.a point on the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield and the Trne Point of Beginning for this description} TiIENCE (1) Departing said Corporate Boundary southerly along the east line of said Section 23 to intersect the south line of the north 180 feet of said Section 23; THENCE (2) l'lesterly along the last named south line one mile, more or less, to intersect the west line of said Section 23; TtIENCE (3) Northerly aim:f, the last named west line to intersect the north line of said Section 23., said intersection being the northwest corner of said Sect}on 23 and the southeast corner of said Section 15; THENCE (4) South 89° 59' 20" 17est along the south lioe of said Section 1S a distance of 462.08 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave to the east which bears South 67° 07' 04" West a radial distance of 1245 feet from the center of said curve, said poiat also being a point on the wesl right of way line of the proposed Miramonte Drive; TtiENCE (S) Continuing along the last named right of way line throogh the following 5 courses: norther]y along the lnst natned curve through a ceotral angle 10o 28' 56" an arc length of 227.77 feet; TdI:NCE (6) North 12° 24' 00" h'est a distance of 641.04 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave to tilt'. east having a radius of 1245 f~et; THENCE (7) Northerly along the last named curve through a central angle of 58° 03' 30" an arc length of 826..98 feet; THE?!CE (8) North 25° 39' 30" East a distance of 967.62 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave to the west having a radius of 1155 .feet; THENCE (9).Northerly along tile last named curve through a central angle of 6° 31' 53" an arc length of 1~1.66 feet to a point on the north line of the south half of said Section 15, said point being a point on the Existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; T?~NCE (10) Easterly and southerly and easterly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the Point of Beginning. Containing 53.05 acres (±) EXHIBIT "g"