HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 35-83RESOLUTION NO. 35-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS PROCEEDING NO. 796,
ANNEXATION NO. 286, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAFCO
RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATION (KERN RIVER
NO. 8).
WHEREAS, a proposal was submitted to the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annexa-
tion of territory to the City of Bakersfield dasignated as Annexa-
tion No. 286 (KERN RIVER NO. 8); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon said proposal
was held before the Commission on the 25th day of January, 1983;
and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing the Commission,
on January 25, 1983, adopted its Resolution Making Determination,
being Resolution No. 83-4, recorded in Minute Book 29 of said
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. Preliminary proceedings for annexation of territory
to the City of Bakersfield designated as Annexation No. 286 (KERN
RIVER NO. 8) were authorized by the City Council of the City of
Bakersfield by action at a regular meeting thereof held on
September 15, 1982; Application for Annexation dated
September 20, 1982, was transmitted to LAFCO; the Certificate of
Filing of the Executive Officer of the Commission shows that the
proposal was filed by him on the 9th day of December, 1982.
2. The distinctive short form designation assigned by
the Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is: "City
of Bakersfield Annexation No. 286 (KERN RIVER NO. 8)."
3. The description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed is contained in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto, and incorporated in this Resolution as though
fully set forth herein.
ANNEXATION NO. 286
KERN RIVER NO. 8
A paireel of' land situated in the County of Kern, State of California,
being a p,)rtion of Sections 26, 27, 53, and 34, Township 29 Sputh, Range 27
East, M.i'.B. & H., more particularly dcsc~ibed as :follows:
Commencing at a point on the east ]iae o1' said Section 33 which bears
Sonth (lO° 26' 04" West a distance of 1000 fcdt from the northeast co~er of
said Section 53, said poznt being a point on the Existing Co.orate Boundary
of cbe City of Bakersfield; thence North 89° 08' 2,1" West along the last
named Corporate Bo~dary a distance of 1170.374 feet to a point on the
northerly line of Parcel 6B of that certain Quitclaim Deed from Tenneco
West, Inc., to the City of Bakersfield recorded June 6, 1977 in Official
Records Book 5032, at page ,166 in the Office of the Kern County Recorder,
said point being the Point of Beginnxng for this description;
TIII!NCE (1) Departing from the Corporate Boundary o:f the City of gakersfield
Nm'tb 09° 46' 13" East along the last named northerly line a dlstance of
313.415 feet;
'lttlNCE (2) South 86° 05' 34" East a distanc~ of 490.34 feet;
'EltliNCl! (3) North 70= 32' 39" East a tit'stance of 407.98 feet to a point on
the east line of said Section
T!IENCE (1) North 00° 36' t),l" East al,mg the last named east line a distance
1369.84 feet to the northeast conmr of said Section 33;
Ti{iNIJI! (51 South 89° 06' ll" East along tle north line of the northwest quarter
of said !feetion 3,1 a distance of 26~'~3.88 Ieet to tile north quarter corner of
said Section 3,i;
TIFI!NCE (6) South 89° 07' 1S" E,=st alonl! the north line of the northeast quarter
said Section 34 a distance of 350 feet;
TIIENCE (7) Northeasterly on a direct line to a point on the west line of said
Section 26, which bears North O0° I9' 55" East a distance of 1700 feet from
the southwest corner of sMd -Section 2O;
TIIENCE (8) Northerly along the ]ast named west line to a point wMch bears
South I)0a 49' 55" West a distance of 343.55 feet from the northwest corner
of the southwest quarter of said Section 26, said point being a point on the
southerly boundary line of the Cross Valley Canal;
DiENCE (9) Easterly along tile last named '~outherly boundary line the following
4 courses: North 48° 36' 25" East a distance of 20!).20 feet to a point on a
tangent curve concave to the southeast ha~ing a radius of 185 feet;
THENCE (10) Northeasterly along tile last named curve through a central angle of
41° 55' 52" an arc length of 135.39 feet;
TIIENCE (11) South 89° 27' 4Y' East a distance of 5'73.85 feet to a point on a
tangent curve concave to the northwest tu~ ing a radius of 915 feet;
TIIENCE (12) Northeasterly along the last ha,ned curYe through a central angle of
31° 03' 38" an arc length of 49b.03 feet to a point on the east line of the
northwest quarter of the southwest quarte2 of said Section 26. said point being
a point on the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
TllENCE (13) generally southerly and weoterly along the last aamed Corporate
Bmmdary to the Point of Beginning.
+
Containing 149.31 Arres -
EXHIBIT
4. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited
as determined by the Commission in its Resolution Making Determina-
tion.
5. The reason for the proposed annexation as set forth
in the proposal thereof submitted to the Commission are that the
privately owned lands within the proposal, consisting of approx-
imately 44.7 acres, are geographically located for more efficient
services from the City of Bakersfield south of the Kern River,
and the City-owned properties, consisting of approximately 96.6
acres, are more appropriate within the City for tax purposes.
6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Wednesday, the 30th
day of March, 1983, at the hour of 7 p.m. (or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is hereby
fixed as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed
annexation where any owner of land within the said described
territory may appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield
and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Any
owner of land within the described territory may file a written
protest against the annexation with the City Clerk of the City of
Bakersfield at 1501 Truxtun Avenue at any time prior to the
conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation.
7. That the Negative Declaration as to this project is
hereby adopted and approved by the City of Bakersfield. The
project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
8. The land and improvements within the territory to
be annexed shall be liable for the general indebtedness of the
City existing at the time of annexation.
9. A Certified copy of this Resolution shall forthwith
be transmitted to the Executive Director of LAFCO.
.......... o0o .........
RJO: mro
2-10-83 2.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of February, 1983, by
the following vote:
CITY CLER~ and Ex officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 16th day of February, 1983
L~t~'] y o~ f~ield'
APPROVED as to form:
~'~ ~ f Bakersfield
CITY ATTOR~OO/f th~
RJO: mr o
2-10-83