HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 128-01RESOLUTION NO. 1 ~8 ' 0 1
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT P01-0223 OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield in accordance
with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on
MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2001, and THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001, on General Plan Amendment
P01-0223 of a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 General Plan, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty
(20) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, such General Plan Amendment P01-0223 of the proposed
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan is as
follows:
General Plan Amendment P01-0223:
SMITHTECH/USA is requesting a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use
Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan changing the land use
designation from LR (Low Density Residential) to HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) on a 28.41 acre portion of Section 19, Township 30 South, Range
27 East, MDB&M generally located along the southwest corner of Pacheco Road
and Old River Road; and
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was conducted and
it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Negative Declaration with mitigation was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation
Procedures, have been duly followed by the city staff and the Planning Commission;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 86-01on June 28, 2001, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment P01-0223
subject to mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the
finding made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2001, on the above described General Plan Amendment P01-
0223 of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 General Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings:
1. All required public notices have been given.
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act have
been followed.
Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has
determined that the proposed project could not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was
prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the surrounding land uses.
The proposed project is consistent with the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
The subject site, with a depth of 470 feet, is sufficiently deep to
provide internal circulation and limited street access to Old River
Road and the future collector along the mid-section line of Section
19.
The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices
justify the amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein, are true and correct.
The Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment P01-0223 is hereby approved
and adopted.
The repod of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers
relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City
Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved.
The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment P01-0223 of
the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "B", attached
2
hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located along
the southwest corner of Pacheco Road and Old River Road subject to mitigation
measures in Exhibit "A".
That General Plan Amendment P01-0223, approved herein, be combined with other
approved cases described in separate resolutions, to form a single Land Use Element
Amendment.
......... 000 ........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
, "~ ~, ~, ?fl~l , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERCARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNClLMEMBER I'r'c~,.~
COUNQLMEMBER ~-~'uZ~
COUNCILMEMBER ~'%~. r
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio C~rk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AUG 2~,
MARK SALVAGG I O ~X/--
VICE MAYOR of the City o.f Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BART J. THILTGEN
City A~o rn~
EXHIBIT "A"
Mitigation Measures
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change P01-0223
Planninq:
If any abandoned or unrecorded wells are uncovered, or damaged during
excavation or grading activities, remedial plugging operations pursuant to
Division of Gas, Oil and Geothermal Resources requirements will be required.
If any archaeological artifacts are discovered during site development, all work
shall stop until the find has been evaluated by a qualified archaeologist or
historian.
If excavation or grading operations uncover a previously unrecorded well, the
applicant/developer must contact the Bakersfield office of the Department of
Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal resources. Such wells may
need remedial operations.
Public Works:
Along with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site
Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment, the following shall occur:
Provide fully executed dedication for Old River Road to arterial standards
for the full frontages of the area within the GPA request. Dedications shall
include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas
for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title
report with the dedication documents.
Prepare a comprehensive drainage study to be submitted to and
approved by the City Engineer. Site any drainage retention facility on the
periphery of the GPA area to facilitate future expansion or consolidation of
drainage facilities as adjacent area develops. The study shall be
approved and any required retention site and necessary easements
dedicated to the City.
Prepare a comprehensive sewer study to be submitted to and approved
by the City Engineer. This area is within the service area of the Buena
Vista II sewer trunk line. The project engineer shall submit verification to
the City Engineer of the sewer system's capability to accept the additional
flows to be generated through development under the new land use and
zoning.
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P01-0223
Page 2
With this application, the project engineer shall prepare a conceptual circulation
study to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer to verify that the
property can be developed with roadways that meet the City's minimum
standards - i.e. BMC 16.28.160 A. "Block Lengths". Local roads developed
along the former Pacheco Road alignment shall be discontinous in nature and
any segment thereof shall not exceed 1,000' in block length as per Bakersfield
Municipal Code Section 16.28.160 A.
Access to the arterial street will be limited and determined at time of division or
development. Determination of whether a right turn lane is required at the
access street(s) will also be made at the time of division or development. A full
access opening will only be considered if the developer funds and installs a
traffic signal at the site entrance. Said signal will only be permitted if a signal
synchronization study is submitted and approved, which shows progression is
not adversely affected.
This applicant has provided analysis which shows there will be an insignificant
change in potential trip generation than expected from the present designations
allowed by the 2010 General Plan. Therefore, traffic impacts are accounted for
in the Transportation Impact Fee Program (Phase 2) and any development on
the site shall be subject to the Traffic Impact Fee schedule in effect at the time of
issuance of building permits.
RED
S:\Dole\P01-0223\Mitigation.wpd
August 1, 2001 (2:35pm)
EXHIBIT "B"
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT P01-0223
EARL WARREN
JUNION HIGH
SCHOOL
PACHECO
LR TO HMR
HMR
18 17
2O
T30S~R27E