HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 RESULTS..,-`-~ ~" l ~ 3~3\~1~ G~a
SWRCB, January 2002
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Page ~ of ~
This form is lnrendcrd jor use by conJractors perfaming pe~iodic testing of UST secondory contalnmenr .rysrems. Use ~he
approprla[e pagcs ojlhis jorm to report results for all components tested The completed form, wriiten -es1 procedures, and
prinrou~s from tesrs ~f applica6leJ, should be provided to thefacrlity owner/operaror for submittal to the locol regulalory agenc7.
i+ ~/~l'f TTII 7~TE'ATR.( A TiAIU
Facili Name: Date of Testing: Z.3 -) ~qN -
Facility Address: ~ S C ~~~ ~ ~
Facility Contact: Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing :
Name of Local Agency laspector ('tf present during testin~:
~..` ,-.~,,..~.,,, . ~m~.., n.~nuw.~ ~ rTnrr
Com anyName:RICH ENVIRONMENTAL
Technician Conducting Test:
Credentials: ~CSLB Licensed Conhactor ~ SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type. C 611 D 9 0 License Number: 8 0 9 8 5 0
Manufacturer anufa¢turer Trainin~
Com onent s Date Trainin Ex ires
INCON INCON TS-STS R " I' oZC~
~_ CiiMMARV nF TFCT Rx CTTI.TC
Component Pass Fail ~0~
Tested ~eP81~
M9ds Component Pass Feil Not
Tested Repairs
M11ade
A N O 0 ~ L1 3- 0 ^ r,.
A / N ~ 0 ^ ^ ^ L!
~1 0 D C7 ~- 0 ~ C
8~- r l~' D o a ~ Il Su ^ o ~ CJ
~~ ~i o a o F11 D n ~ r~
R1 0 0 o r-~~r o a ~ ~
~E ~E ~ O Q U / it 0 CJ ~ ^
~ 0 0 0 c 0 Q I~
~ 0 ^ ^ $=ff~ V 1~ ^ fJ D
~ ^ ^ ! ~ crc CJ 0 0
D! S L 5 ~t1 O ^ f~ 0 0 C ~
C I-Z ~( ~ 0 0 0 0 C!
lf hydrostatic cesting was perfprmed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests:
RECYCLE AND REUSFD
CERTYFICATION OF TECFINTCIAN RESPONSi$LE I~'OR CONDUC'CING THIS TESTIIYG
Tb t/le besr of my knowledge, Ilte jacls slated !q !h!s documenl are accurole and !h ju(1 compliarrce wiil~ /egul reyuiremenls
Tectuiician's Signature: 1-~ Date: 2~- ~RN -O 9
,~~ ~~~ ~~
SWRCB, January 2002
~ m~ wrv • wi1~RIT • D TL'CT7TTf~
Pa~e ~ of ~_ _
Tcsc Mechod Dcvciopcd By; 0 Tank ManuPacturcr f~ Industry Standard 0 Profcssional Engincer
0 Other (Spec~)
'1'est Metliod Used: O Pressure ~ Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
d Odier (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: 4 i n. DI AL GAUGE
' ~ ~' ,'~'y' ,~t ~ r w ;T;`~,;;~~°. •~~~ Tank # ~ ~ Tank li $~f~ CJ/
r.. Equipment Resolution: . 5~
.. - ,~<-~~
Tank # f~IESEL, Taok #1'
~s Tank Exempt From resling?~ ^ Yes ,~Io L] Yes ~No U Yes ,~No 0 Yes C' No
'T'atik Capacity: /p O ~ U
Tank Motcrial: T~,~-L
Tank Munufacturer: u <
Product Srored: ~
Wait cime between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
srlnin ~ test:
3~
~N
~!
_
Test Stai~t Time: /
Initial Rcadin~ (R~): /~ _
Test End Tune: /j 0
Fiiial Readiog {Rt:); ~ ~c[ /~
Test Duration: / ~~
Change in Reading (RF-Ri): O •O 14~ Q.
Pass/Fail l'liresl~old or Crite~ia: ~ ,0
Test Resuli: Pass Fail Pass C] Fai] Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass ^ Fail
W ns censor rernoved foc testingl Yes 0 No 0 NA Yes ^ No 0 NA ,~1'es ^ No ^ NA 0 Yes ^ No f~ NA
W as sensor properly repEaccd and
verified functional after testin ? tuf yes ^ No 0 NA
P' ,~Yes Q No O NA ~Yes ~ No 0 NA 0 Yes D No D NA
COmmentS -(i.nclude itrforma~ian on rePalrs made prior lo lesting, and recomnrended fo!!ow-up for jai/ed lests)
~ Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors botl- the primary and secondary
containmeitt, such as systcros that are l~ydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a}(6)}
~ ~-~ «y sa
SWRC$, January 2002
c eL i`nwrn w ov DTDT~ TYi CTTN!_
Page 3 of ~
Test Method Developed 8y: ^ Piping Manufacturer '~Cl Industry Standard 0 Professional ~ngineer
^ Other (Spec~)
Test Method Used: ftl Pressurc ^ Vacuum Q i-~ydrostatic
d Other (Spec{/'y)
TesiEquipmentUsed:4in. DIAL GAL3GE EquipmentltesoEution: .5%
~~~'~ Pipinp Run # Piping Run t! !¢ Piping Run #9/ Piptng Ran N~S~
Piping Material; / SS /g SS
Piping Mart~fatturer: ~
Piping Diameter: Z 1
[.ength of Piping Run: -j'~ SO F~ ~
Product Storcd; 1 QI~S L-
Method and location of
i in -run isolation:
f
!
~"
B 5
Wait time between applying
pressureJvacuum/water and
startin tesC
~ TJ
Test Start Time: ( /
Initial Reading (R~:
Test End Time: 5~5 rj
/ ~
/ ~
/l00 ~I"1
Finai Reading (RF): 5 7 S S ~
Test Duration: ( u /~yp~{~2 //fp
Change in Reading (RF R,): '~S •O ! Sf
Pass~Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
O.O
6,
~ S
0. S
Test Result: Pass 0 Fail ~' Pass ^ Fafl ~' Pass 0 Fail ~[Pass D Fa i!
COIrimCnts -(rnclude injormolion on repoirs made prior 1o tes[ing, and recommended follow-up jor jailed testsJ
~3 ~Z~ sa
SWRCB, January 2002
L DTDiIUl~ CiSMD TL`CT7Nf_`
Page ~t ~
Test Method Developed By: ^ Sump Manufacturer ~ lndustry Standard ^ Professional En~ineer
~ Other (Spec~)
Trst Method Used: U Presswe ^ Vacuum kl Hydrostatic
^ Other (Spec~)
Test Equipment Used: INCO TS-STS Equipment Resolution: , o0o i n.
Sump # g~ Sump q ~` Sump #~'/ Surnp #~SC_
Sump Diameter: ~ I/v 3~ N 7~' /N ~ N
s~,~,P n~~,: `1 a N `~-O ~J 4o i
Swnp MateriaL• ~ ~f?.~ ~ ~
Hcight from Tanfc Top to Top oF
Hi hest Pi in Penatration: 1 Z~ l~ ,~ j~/~
~T
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Elecvical Penetration: l Z , ~Z ~~ ~Z r 1~ ) Z //`~
Coudition of sump prior to testing: ~' ~' L~/~
Ponion of Sump "1'ested~ 2. / /
Boes turbine shut down when
sump sensor de[eccs liquid (both
roduct and water ?~
Yes D No Q NA
Yes ^ No ^ i~tA
,~Yes 0 No O NA
A
~'Yes 0 No 0 NA
Turbine shutdown response time 2 S C, Z S
Is system pro~aznmed for fail-safe
ShUI~OW11~~ ,pyyes ^ No q NA
" ` Yes O No Q NA
~ ,~'es ^ No Q NA ~i(Yes ^ No D NA
W a9 fail-safe verified to be
o erational? ~es 0 No Q NA ~.Yes D No ^ NA ~Yes 0 No D NA ,~Yes 0 No ~ NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
-~O M,~
'~ M~N
~j M/N
3~ r~-r!~
Tes~ Scart Time: / 3 7$~ 1'l{0 / IIOOR AM l2 Z
lnitial Reading (Ri): `f. • 5 ~i.! 2/ S 1 ~ 1. •~~/3 i
Test End Time: Z ~/ / 2(j/ M 12~~ 1! fN1 /25! I~a !l Z+`'~
Final Reading (RF): ~}. S • 5 Si . Zt 5 $ O 3 ~~o/
Tesr Duretion: ^/ /$ Hl ~ ~$ ~ SH I~/
Change in Reading (RF-Ra: ! a •
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: ,~ Z 2 ~
' ~ , ao
Test Result: `,~1 Pass D FaU p Fal1
J~Pass Pass 0 Fail Pess 0 Fafl
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes D No 0 NA es ^ No ONA }~`Yes ~No QNA ,~'Yes ^T!o 0 NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional atter testin ?
~Yes ^ No ^ NA
~,Yes 0 No ^ NA
~Yes ^ No 0 NA
,~Yes [7 No Cl NA
CUCIIRIe0t3 -(rnclude inforrnalion on reyuirs made prior ~o ~esting, and recommended jollow-up for farled Jes~s)
' If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. lf the answer to ~ of the questions indicated with an
astcrisk (~) is "NO" or "NA", the en['ve sump must be tested. {See SWRCS LG-160)
~ ~ ~~~ ~~
S W kiCB, January 2002
~ ~n.m~u_r~icpxnrcFU rnrrrenv~rF.x~r Rm[`1 TESTING
Page ~ of ~
, . .....,....-~....,. .. - - - -
Test Method Developed By: 0 UDC Manufacturer ~]ndustry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
Q Other (Spec~J
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure ^ Vacuum ~ Hydrostatic
O Olher (Specify)
Test6quipmentUsed: ~NCON TS-STS Equipm~ntResolution: .oooin.
UDC # - 2 UDC # - UDC # 5- ~c UDC #'~- $
'UDC Manufacturcr: U ~ ts~./i/ N ~
UDC Material; /
UDC De [h: - 24- t N 'L N
Hei~ht from UDC Bottom to Top
ofHi hestPi in Penetradon:
Z
12 -J
1 Z !N f 2
Height 6~om UDC Bottom to
Lowest Elecvical Penctration:
//
Condicion of UDC prior ~o
testin : ~1/E~
c.' IyL~N
~- CC~~~ ~
C~~
Portion of UDC Tested (`r / N `1- 1N `~ ~ ~ /J
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid {both
roduct and watcr ?~
~Yes 0 No ^ NA
~S Yes 0 No 0NA
,~ Yes 0 No ~ NA
~dYes ^ No D N~
-
Turbine shutdown res onse time Z Zs~ Z ~C
lssystemprogrammedforfail-
safe shutdown7~ ~Yes 0Tlo ^NA ,~Yes ONo f3NA ,~QYes ONo ONA ,~Yes ^No ONA
Was fai I-safe verified to be
o erational?~ ~yes 0 No ^ NA ~'es ^~lo ^ NA ~'Yes 0 No ^ NA ,'~'1'es Q No ^ NA
W¢it time between applying
pressure/vecuum/water and
startin test
3
30 ~"~ ~A/
~~ N
~~
Test Stort T'une; Zp 2i (~ ~ 2t 1~ r•~t 2o r- 2! b 1
fnitial Eteadin Ri : 2.35p Z•35 , 082~ r K
Test End Time: 21(o ri 231 yv 2 1 2 '1 2 r7
Final Resdin RF): 2.3Sb 2. 5 3 ~1 /
Test Duration: ! f5 N I 1
Chan e in Readin RF-R~ : • do o. . . e
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criterie: , o Z z Z
'
• Z 2
•
Test Result: ~d Pass C1 Fail JS Pass 0 Fail 0 Fai!
,~ Pass ~ Pass 0 Fail
Was sensor removed fur testing7 Yes 0 No 0 NA Yes ONo ONA es 0 No ^NA ,~$'Ycs ~No UNA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? yes 0 No O NA
~
.~Y~s O No 0 NA `'
,~1 Yes ^ No ~ NA
,P#Yes Q No C~ NA
COmmC11tS -(include rnformation on re~airs mude prior !o lestinR, and recommended jo!!ow-up fur f'ct~%ed fesf~
~ lf the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to a~ of the questions indicated with en
asterisk (t) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
:~.~~~~ ~
SWRCB, Jenuary 2002
T rror.~~ nnl-ITA TNMFN7` CTTMT~ 'lTCTTnIC:
Page `~`~ of ~`
O. ~ LLL ~ivr.a~ ~.va ~ a ra..a ..~ - - -- -
Facili is Not ui With Fill Riser Containment Sum s ~
FiU Riser ContaInment Sumps are P+'esent, but were Not Tested ^
Test Method Developed By: 0 Sump Manufachuer ~lndustry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
^ Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Q Vacuum ID Hydrostatic
q Other (S'pec~}
Test Squipment Used: INCON TS-STS Equipment Resolution: . OOOin .
' Fill Sum # Fili Sum # Fitl 5um # Fil1 Sum #
Sum Diametcr:
Sum De th:
Hei~ltt from Tank Top to Top of
Hi • ~est Pi in Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump priar to
testintr:
Portion of Sum Tested
Sum Material:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuumJwater and
startin test: ~
Test Start Time:
Initial Readin ~):
Test End 7'ime:
Final Readin RF :
Test Duration;
Chan e in Readin R R,)~
pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: ~ Pass L7 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail p Pass 0 Fai{ 0 Pass C] FaiJ
Is the~e a sensor in the sump? ^ Yes ^ No ^ Yes D No p Yes ^ No 0 Yes 0 No
Does the sensor alarni when
either product or water is
detected?
0 Yes O No 0 NA
0 Yes ^ No 0 NA
Cl Yes ^ No 0 NA
0 Yes ^ No ~ NA
Was sensor removed for testing? ^ Yes 0 No ~ NA 0 Yes ^ No ^ I~IA Q Yes ^ No ^ NA D Yes ~ No 0 NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? ~ yes ^ No Q NA 0 Yes ^ No 0 NA ^ Yes 0 No U NA ^ Yes ~ No ~ NA
Comments -(include information on ~epairs made prio~ to testing, and recommended
;~3 ~~y ~~
SWRC$, January 2002
9. SPII,IJOVERF'TLL CONTAI7YMENT BOXES
Page ~. of ~
Facili is Not E ui ed With S ilUOvc~II Containment Boxes 0
SpilllOverfill Containment Boxes are Aresent, but were Not Tested 0
Test ivtethod Developed By: 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer ~ Industry Standard ~ Professional Engioeer
Q Other (Spec~)
Test Method Used: D Presswe ^ Vacuum ffi HydrostaUc
0 Other (SpecifyJ
Test Equipment Used: INCO N TS-S~Y'S Equipment Resolution: • 000 llt .
;(~
'+*
~ Spill Box # ~/ ~
pfE[ Box #
f Spiil Box #~/
Spill Box p
Bucket Dinmeter: Z ~^/ Z ~/ /Z ~/~
Bucket Depih: (0 1 ~
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water snd
sturtin test:
~Q !
~`
~tJ Ml
~ M/N
"fest Stan Time; //U AM I t I I
f~itiai Reading (R~: S•~Z~.
Test End Time: (~ (, p~ 1 ~7 lllfo rl µI~-> M
F'inal Reading (RF): ~. zG, 5. N ~/
Test Duration: ~ ~~/ p5 inl N
Change in Reading (RF-R~); . 0 ! p ,pp
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
•OOZ~ '~OZI/~
~oo .0 Zi
•002.
•0p
Test Result: ~Pass D Fai1 ~ Pass ^ Fail $. Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
CUmmellts -(rnclyde /nformation on repairs made~rior ro testing, curd recarrmended follow-up for jai/ed tests)
i-~
f-_
91STF
~?,1~L.~, ~a
TEST STRRTED 2%16 t'M TEST STARTED 2~60 PM TEST 5TAR1'ED 11:06 Hlh
TEST STARTED 23~61i26E~9 TEST STRRTED 23i91i2@99 TES? STARTED 23if1i2b6~
BEGIN LEUEL 2.3563 IN BEGIN LEVEL G.3576 IN BEGIN LtUEL 4.5059 IN
END TIME 2~31 phi END TIP1E 2~16 PM END TIME 11:16 AM
tND f~ATE 23i01i2005 END DATE 23i01i2009 ENG DATE 23i91i2069
END LEVEL 2.3559 IN END LEUEL 2.35b3 IN END LEUEL 4.5105 iN
LERK THkESNOL D 0.002 IN LERK THREBHOLD 0.0~2 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
7EST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSEG
3-4
TEST STARTED 2~ 16 PI'I
TEST STflRTED 23i01/2009
BEGIN LEUEL 3.0844 IN
ENG TIME 2~31 PM
END DATE 2z~08426iN
ENG LEVEL
LEAK THRESHOL6 6.602 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
3-4
TEST STARTED 'G~~H Phi
TEST STARTED 23i91~2009
BEGIN LEUEL 3.0827 IN
END TIME 2:16 P!9
END DRTE 23f01i20H9
END LEUEL 3.0845 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91UPR
TEST STflRTED 11:6h Af~i
TEST STARTED 23i01~2909
BEGIN LEVEL 5.7668 IN
END TIME 11:16 AM
ENU URTE 23~91~260°
END ~EVEL 5.7060 IN
LERK THRE5HOL6 ~.602 IN
TEST kESULT PASSED
5-c. S-6 87UPR
TEST STARTED 2:16 PM TEST STARTED 2:@0 PM TtST STARTED 11:00 AM
TEST STARTEU 23~01~20fi9 TEST STAP.TED 23~91~208? TEST STARTED 23~01~2009
BEGIN LEUEL 5.1290 IN BEGIN LEUEL 5.1282 IN BEGIN LEUEL 5,6272 IN
END TIME 2:31 PMt END TIME 2:26 PM END TIME 11:16 AM
END DATE 23i01i2069 END DATE 23i01~2009 END DATE 23i01~2009
END LEUEL 5.1288 IN END LEUEL 5.1291 IN END LEVEL 5.b267 IN
LERK THRESHOI D 0.0A2 IN ~EAK THRESNOLD 0.002 TM LEflK THRESHOLD a.002 IN
TEST RESULT PRSSED TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED
7-ii
TEST STRRTED 2:16 PP1
TEST STARTED '2.ii01i2009
BEGIN LEUEL 2.4487 IN
END TIME 2:31 PM
END DATE 23~01i2669
END LEUEL Z•4d8z IN
I.ERK THRESHGLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87STP
iEST STRRTED 12:57 F~!
7EST STARTEG 23~61i2069
BEGIN LEVEL 4.584b IN
END 7IME 1:12 PP1
END DATE 23i91i2009
END ~EUEL 4.5851 IN
LERK TffHESHOLU 8.082 IN
TES7 RESULT PRSSED
7-8
TEST STARTED 2:60 PM1
TE5T STARTE~ 23101~2009
BEGIN LEVE~ 2.4489 IN
END TIME 2:16 PM
END DATE 23~01i2005
END LEVEL 2.4487 IN
LERK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSEp
~,.~__...~._._..~__ _. -- -
a7STF
~
T~ST STARTED 12:36 PM
TEST STARTED 23i81~2085
~sEGIN LEUEL 4,5842 IN
ENp TIME 12:51 PP'i
END DATE 23i01i2009
END LEUEL 4.5842 IN
LERK THRESHULD 0.062 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSLSTP
TEST STARTED 12:57 PM
TEST STRRTED 23i01i2005
BEGIN LEUEL 1.6137 IM
END TIME 1:12 PM
END DATE ' 23~01~2005
ENO LEUEL 1.6136 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSEG
/
/
DSL,STP
TEST STARTED 12:36 FM
TEST S7RRTED 23i01i200y
BEGIN LEUEL 1.6139 IN
END TIME 12:51 PM
END DATE 23i01~2069
ENG LEUEL 1.6138 IN
L.E=RK THRESHOLD 8.082 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87RUPR
TEST STARFED 11:00 APi
TEST STARTED 23~01i2009
BEGIN LEVEL 5.9743 IN
END TIME 11:16 AM
END DATE 23i81i2B09
END LEVEL ~5.9743 IN
LEAK THRESHOLO 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT I PASSED
yisrF
Tc~T STARTED 11:~6 RM
TES7 S7flR7ED 23i01i206y
BEGIN i_EUEL 4.5184 IN
END TIME 11:31 APi
cNC~ DflTE 23/01/2009
EFJD LEUEL 4,S1b5 IN
LERK THREBHOLD 0.062 IN
TEST f~ESULT PASSEP
91UPR
TEST STARTED 11:16 AM
TEST STRRTED 23i01~2009
BEGIN LEVEL. 5.7059 IN
END TIME 11:31 AM
END DRTE 23i01i2009
END ~GUEL 5.7958 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.902 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87UFR
?EST STARTED 11:16 RM
TEST STRRTED 23/01/2009
BEGIN LEUEL 5.6268 IN
ENQ TIME 11:31 RM
END 4ATE 23i01i2009
END LEUEL 5.6267 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST f2ESULT PRSSED
~?7AUPk
TEST BTARTED 11:16 AM
TEST STARTED 23ie1i2099
EEGIN LF_UEL 5.9742 IN
END TIME 11:31 frM
END DATE 23i01~2009
END ~EUEL 5,9742 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87RSTP
TE87 STRRTED 11:46 AM
TEST STARTED 23~01~2@85
&ErIN ~~U~L 5.1824 IN
END TIh1E
~~~ 4RTE 1~:81 Ppf
END LEUEL 23~61~2009
LEAK 7HRESHOLD S~1$27 jN
TEST RESULT e'a02 IN
~RSSED
~3~~ ~~
87ASTF
TEST STARTED 12:02 PM •
TEST Si'ARTED 23i01i20d9
BEGIN LEUEL 5.1827 IN
E~C TIf1E 12: i7 Phr
END Dr17E 23~81i2609
END LEUEL 5.1$2g IN
LEHK THRESHULD 0.gA2 IN `
7EST RESULT PASSEU
u
~ ~
/
/
~~~~~ ~o
SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT
9 I TE t3AME '~ J-l JC~t/ DATE : Z~-~~N' p~
rwoxESS~ I00 S OSWLC~-~- T~cariicz~: /SR/tND~TI /`'j~N
C I TY :~~C~~/'/ ~~ S I GNATUFiE ; ~ ~`"
SITE CONTACT: D 3 -
THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED/REBAIREp TO COMPL£TE THE SB989
TESTING.
LIST OF PARTS REPLACED/REPAZRED:
REPAIRS:J~I
PARTS INSTALLED:~~