HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 009-10
RESOLUTION NO. 0 0 9 " 0
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 626
LOCATED WEST OF RENFRO ROAD, BETWEEN
KRATZMEYER AND REINA ROADS, EAST OF NORD
AVENUE. (WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located west of Renfro
Road, between Kratzmeyer and Reina Roads, east of Nord Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B" for
the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set
forth herein, generally located west of Renfro Road, between Kratzmeyer and Reina
Roads, east of Nord Avenue.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government
Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to
the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the
affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the
territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was adopted
by the City Council and the Environmental Document for the annexation is
determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal.
o``gAKF9~
r
Fn
r-
G
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined
to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese-
Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with
copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Roberta Gafford
Acting City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with
Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of
Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309.
000
2 o, aK
81 r
J O
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council
of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on JAN 2 7 2010
by the following vote:
✓ ✓ / ✓ ✓
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, I, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
S: COUNCILMEMBER: Y16~9~_
AB N: COUNCILMEMBER: ~l
BSEN . COUNCILMEMBER: M
ROBERTA GAFFORD, C
ACTING CITY CLERK an x Officio Clerk of the
JAN 2 7 2010 Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
EXHIBITS: A - Legal Description
B - Map
C - Plan for Services
DL:dc
S:\Annexation\Res of Applic\ROA 625.doc
T
m
3
`v o
r)RI('INAL
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 625
KRATZMEYER RANCH
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND
REORGANIZATION OF NORTH OF THE
RIVER SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 1
BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 32 INCLUSIVE, OF SALES MAP OF LANDS
OF THE KERN COUNTY LAND COMPANY IN SECTION 9, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M.
FILED APRIL 8, 1892 IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER AND A
PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 10, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. AND LOTS
29 THROUGH 32 INCLUSIVE, OF SALES MAP OF LANDS OF THE KERN COUNTY
LAND COMPANY IN SECTION 10, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. FILED SEPTEMBER 10, 1892
IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 23 AND
24 AND ALL OF LOTS 25 AND 26, OF SALES MAP OF LANDS OF THE KERN COUNTY
LAND COMPANY IN SECTION 11, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. FILED JANUARY 9, 1891 IN
THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER AND A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 36-05 AS EVIDENCED BY THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE
OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED MARCH 28, 2006 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0206073276, O.R.
AND PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10930 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 2003 IN
BOOK 53 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 35 THROUGH 38 AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1
THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, OF SALES MAP OF LANDS OF THE KERN COUNTY LAND
COMPANY IN SECTION 15, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. FILED DECEMBER 29, 1890 IN THE
OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 8
INCLUSIVE, OF SALES MAP OF LANDS OF THE KERN COUNTY LAND COMPANY IN
SECTION 16, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. FILED DECEMBER 29, 1890 IN THE OFFICE OF
THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER, ALSO BEING PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 9, 10, 11, 14,
15 AND 16, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M. IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE
COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SALES MAP CORNER OF LOTS 12, 13, 20 AND 21 OF SALES
MAP OF LANDS OF THE KERN COUNTY LAND COMPANY IN SECTION 11, T. 29 S., R.
26 E., M.D.M., SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL B OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 36-05 AND THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF OLIVE
DRIVE (CO. RD. #67) AND RENFRO ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00°44'49" WEST ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL B AND THE CENTERLINE OF RENFRO ROAD, 30.00
FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OLIVE DRIVE (CO. RD. #67) AND THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EXISTING CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD BOUNDARY;
THENCE (1) CONTINUING ALONG LAST SAID LINE AND SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH
00°44'49" WEST, 630.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
PARCEL B;
THENCE (2) NORTH 89016'27" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL B
AND SAID BOUNDARY, 1320.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID PARCEL B AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 36-05;
~gr~KF~
rn
r-
c~ C;
0RIGINAI.
THENCE (3) SOUTH 00°44'02" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL A
AND SAID BOUNDARY, 2011.48 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF REINA ROAD (CO. RD. #715);
THENCE (4) SOUTH 89°15154" EAST ALONG LAST SAID LINE AND SAID BOUN-
DARY, 1182.14 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF RENFRO ROAD AND
THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1400.00 FEET TO WHICH POINT A
RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 63022'50" EAST;
THENCE (5) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE CENTERLINE OF
RENFRO ROAD AND SAID BOUNDARY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 19016'30" AN ARC LENGTH OF 470.98 FEET;
THENCE (6) DEPARTING SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH 45°53'40" WEST ALONG THE
CENTERLINE OF RENFRO ROAD, 1329.49 FEET TO THE SOUTH COR-
NER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10930 AND THE NORTH-
EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANTA FE WAY (CO. RD. #305);
THENCE (7) NORTH 44-16'40- WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1
AND THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANTA FE WAY (CO.
RD. #305),1826.52 FEET;
THENCE (8) NORTH 00°45'40" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, A
DISTANCE OF 27.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
REINA ROAD (CO. RD. #715);
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF REINA ROAD (CO. RD.
4715,4 177 AND #835) THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES;
(9) NORTH 89°15'53" WEST, 2642.46 FEET;
(10) NORTH 89°15'30" WEST, 2644.25 FEET;
(11) NORTH 89-16'12" WEST, 2640.77 FEET;
(12) NORTH 89°16'03" WEST, 2675.82 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF NORD AVENUE (CO. RD. #767);
THENCE (13) NORTH 00°48'34" EAST ALONG LAST SAID LINE, 2704.30 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KRATZMEYER ROAD (CO. RD. #67);
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KRATZMEYER ROAD
(CO. RD. #67) THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES;
(14) SOUTH 89°14'06" EAST, 2673.33 FEET;
(15) SOUTH 89°16'30" EAST, 2640.35 FEET;
oQ'q
s~
rn
J O
ORIGINAL
(16) SOUTH 89°14'53" EAST, 2554.57 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANTA FE WAY (CO. RD. #305) AND THE EXISTING
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD;
THENCE (17) SOUTH 44°16'40" EAST ALONG LAST SAID LINE, 84.90 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OLIVE DRIVE (CO. RD. #67);
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OLIVE DRIVE (CO. RD.
#67) AND SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWLNG TWO COURSES:
(18) SOUTH 89°14'53" EAST, 2670.60 FEET;
(19) SOUTH 89°16'27" EAST, 2646.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING.
CONTAINS: 793.26 ACRES
i r
4
C E by
WEAN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFME
Delp 1.?- /1' 9
Approved by
KRATZMEYER RANCH-ANNEX-LGL
} m
G
b~ ~~4 N z ~ ~ s
m
OAYptlMltl - E.. 1f~
6 ~ ~ ybo 9F
C Y mu ~e3W
\ Y yq3 II S1An zo 013U 83MY9 ~sdij III ~
I tN M't1Yf Y.ID,N.EpE 'vi ~ -
3/13A Sp3N '
01-OW-6M
S l5 . ~~y~ ~
OWN
U-0lO-BZS NdV Zt-Ol0'!ZS NdY : ~ tiff
as yy : r }.c
t-n - ~
N = o lei Z j
U$ o=
LL WJ (awmw
CON lb*
O
CD c)
z oZ~a w
O LLJ N p 8
W X 0 @ i
OZQZ ^ Z C)'
X N zC<D N¢ oz w ~
[if W Q oOw F-: J ~
t-w>
J uawv§f-----_---_---
Q Ct--
52
z Z o 6y no
< W
m F- a-
d o< bd w zz
abat"' " ° w N
- < S~ F tlbbR %I
- -
8 F S
Q 2j
>j R
d
~bb~ o Ada ~ a
b. ®0 ~ab bq ba
> I
w9 ¢ way ~a d . U w Q
Lw 'a oo) ' Q
Iz. Lil 3"VMM
- _ r Q~b ¢ D W f TI OCIOtf 3.%'fi.W N t~ ~ i i ~ - i ~W J
~ Qz
w < • ~ Al(flEil W M K
° a @1013» °
FN
o I-Ill
} m
r
J O
ORIGINAL.
Ln =
at z co cwc
Z Q v o
u- F-
z
~w n z z z z
a2 M~ ww >>w ~ O z z
~ ~ o
w
zd ` WW Ww w4 4 w w w
Z o 0 ¢2
D Z Q
_ 4 Q 4 4: j 4~ 4 w Q Q w w w
~U-U.
d - ocac ococ mz-mz¢z¢¢
Zvi WW wwoww¢wWwwww ¢ ¢ ¢
2m~, zz zzzz az>z>zzwww
oil cW7~~00LL.cW7a~cmOcwcOMOO»>
=v c
V
0
a
W U ¢
U w > c'J V
9 = o ¢ ¢
m 3
W
V Z LL~ O 3
z
0O 3 ~~C5 z80 v 5 o (.50 §1:11
>v
x n
w Ic o
- ¢ z
a a
d > Q O
m ¢
F
C. W t9
LL ad
3 ~i LL ~oi~
z I-- ¢ z z z z U) Z
8081: O c~ c7 cOi~z>c~
a zc~cncs
O
C
Q
QI X
w
cc o~ cm w
c
c a ¢
c $a m m m~~
ed ow
LLO.JdLL t1 U7 LL s
f!!
T
m
ORIGINAI
Vo 8 m m 2
V F- V V Q
o vC
m N j gyp y t4
E Uf N O m V V Cod
l
v
m o c coi c~i
cm CL
EC cod 0 £ c0
c 3& c U Yc c~co
15 ai o m rn o
cogg v a,
ocOE L
e~ c°~m v a
m y$ o'a a., ° m v c= x x
« m W D N C fp V O 3 m N
LL or- IS
-9 mm a- 0.
r- 0 we &ct
.Q .2
Ca cm so
a E if. m w o r " Cf) Q U
.3
L 3 W N _ U G r S, C .O
3 °v ::iS g ~a ~V cm
c~ ~t0 ~i`~tnm a: to }
0 Cl) m 3 ns m N
O ~ v m
m ~e0 78
m a`tm m> >o ca mmm~
V m r r 4- "a t {J
p C Q m G O E C
(C V 3 m
p F- v
c m C: g c~ 0
3m - :3 c 3: el U)
-k 0 ca A
z.2 - >m =ohm cn _
a ~mm o3 oa Y `t. at v CL
EE 'E 0
p m N m t 3 Z Q RL+~ r_ 0
-69
.0 0 IL
'S 8 0 m 1 B W U - t a 'am ~w m~,~ mom m m
o
79
0: 1-6
ca m oo
U Zm
E a c3 ti
~V Lo ci.ftm$ 3 3 a~
v m 0-
E .
m^ r'L N C.r. ~a~ 4 G H y = tii u~
yt $~c W m m V a~Em
ctl _ e
c U a m o 3
$1 m
t;
I oa 8. x F5srg E m
06-S -0 CL a m
53m U 5Z= pa~0 W I
r M LA
T N
s
v o
ORIGINAL
1. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to
provide needed services At the time of any future development it is unlikely that additional
police officers would be reauired to maintain the current level of city service The development of
any public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance
responsibility of the City but should not affect the existing level of service.
2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district gr residents be responsible for financing?
Private development provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the Citv No
upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The territory is presently zoned County A
(Exclusive Agricultural) Zone.
4. Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.)The City has
adopted the pre-zoning A (Agricultural) R-1 0 family dwelling unit) R-2 (limited multiple family
unit) C-2 (commercial) C-O (commercial & professional office).
5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police
should be able to respond in a timelier manner than present County Sheriff servioes Parcels
within this incorporated area are allowed to connect to available NORSD sewer system lines The
present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to
independent companies. No special assessments or charges for street sweeping. leaf collection
street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants when kxated within the Cltv's incorporated area
City government also provides increased Witical representation for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rates in the area equals 1.112385 and 1.083970
of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate, When annexed a
designated percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder
to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 2009-2010
County Auditor-Controllers Tax Rates and Assessed Values).
7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district? If so, explain.
No, the current tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The property rate will not increase due to annexation and reassessment will not occur due to
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No, the existing annexation area is
not subiect to a Williamson Act Contract.
gP, KF9
- 3 -
SAANNEXATIONUnnex 625tExhibk CDOC
G