Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 040-10 RESOLUTION NO. 0 4 0- 1 0 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 601 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAGEMAN ROAD AND ALLEN ROAD, EAST OF THE A.T. & S. F. RAILROAD TRACKS. (WARD 4). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located at the southeast corner of Hageman Road and Allen Road, east of the A.T. & S. F. Railroad tracks; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B" for the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein, located at the southeast corner of Hageman Road and Allen Road, east of the A.T. & S. F. Railroad tracks. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was adopted by the City Council and the environmental document for the annexation is determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal. r_ 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of a negative declaration as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act have been duly followed. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation. 9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary. 10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese- Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. 11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Roberta Gafford City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1600 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1600 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Virginia Gennaro City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1600 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309. 000 2 y. C _ obi- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on APR 0 7 2010 by the following vote: YE COUNCILMEMBER: CARSON, B HAM, WEIR, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER LADES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: nuaL ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ROBERTA GAFFORD, C)Mgf CITY CLERK and Ex Off' io Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED APR 0 7 2010 HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfiel APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENN O City Attorney By: EXHIBITS: A - Legal Description B - Map C - Plan for Services DL:dc S:\Annexation\Res of Applic\ROA 601.doc 3 F- Exhibit "A" HAGEMAN NO.6 CITY OF BAKE RSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 601 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being a portion of Lots 25.2t . and 27 of Sales Map of Lands of Kern County Land Company iot Section 13, Township 25 South. Range 26 East, M D.M.. as shown oil map recorded in the office of the County Recorder of kern County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 13; Thence North 00°4248" Fast, along the west line of the southwest quarter of said Section 13 a distance of 62.08 feat to a point on the northeasterly right of way line of the A.T.&S.F. Railroad, 100.00 feet wide, said point being the TRITE POINT OF BEGINI NG. 1. Thence continuing along said west line, North 0042'48" East 508.01 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of liageman Road (Co. Rd. No. 3264), 60.00 feet wide. said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the south having a radius of 1370.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears North 08°35'03" West; 2. Thence easterly along said curve and right of way through a central angle of 0230'4]" an arc distance of 60.05 feet to a point of departure from said curve, a radial line to said point beats North 06°04'22" West; 3. Thence along said radial line North 06104'22" West 60.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Hageman Road. 60.00 feet wide, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the south having a radius of 1430.00 feet to which a radial bears North 6°04'22" West; 4. Thence easterly along said curve and northerly right of way, through a central angle of 06°53'OT' an arc distance of 171.84 feet; 5. Thence tangent to said curve South 89°11' 15" East 421.22 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the south having a radius of 1430.00 feet; 6. Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 00°02'47" an arc distance of 1.15 feet to a point on the existing City of Bakersfield boundary and a point of departure from said northerly right of way line, a radial line to said point bears North 00°51'32" East; 7. Thence along said boundary, South 00°47'53" West 60.00 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of Hageman Road, 60.00 feet wide said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 1370.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears North 00°51'41" East; 8. Thence southeasterly along said southerly right of way line and curve and along said boundary, through a central angle of 38°46' 15" an are distance of 927.05 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1430.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears South 39°3756" West: Page 1 of 2 ~f- 9. Thence southeasterly along said curve and said boundary through a central angle of 11°26'34" an arc distance of 285.59 feet to the point of beginning of E. reverse curve concave to the west having a radius of 20.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of reverse curve bears South 28°11'22" West: 10. Thence departing said boundary southcastcr iv. southerly and southwesterly- along said curve through a cer?tral angle of 88°01'26" an arc distance of 30.73 feet. to F p()int on the northerly right of'.N•ay line of Paddock Place. 60 feet wide. 11. Thence tangent to said curve and along said northerly line of Paddock Place. South 26°12'48" West 5.86 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 120.00 feet, 12. Thence southwesterly and westerly along said curve and northerly line of Paddock Place, through a central angle of'64°35'57" an arc distance of 135.30 feet; 13. Thence tangent to said curve North 89°11' 15" West 421.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 25.00 feet; 14. Thence westerly and northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 62°10'55" an arc distance of 27.13 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 50.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of reverse curve bears North 6259'40" East; 15. Thence northwesterly, westerly and southerly along said curve through a central angle of 175°46'37" an arc distance of 153.39 feet, to a point of departure from said curve and said northerly line of Paddock Place, said point being on the north line of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 11071, as shown on map recorded in Parcel Map Book 53, at Pages 109 & 110 in the office of said County Recorder, a radial line from said curve bears North 67°13'03" East; 16. Thence along the north line of said parcel. North 89°11'15" West 228.95 feet; 17. Thence continuing along the south line of the southwest: quarter of said Section 13, North 89°11'15" West 814.63 feet; 18. Thence along the northerly right of way of the AT & SF Railroad North 44°16'08"West a distance of 87.91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 19.72 acres LANp A.G G ~ Charles A. Reuter, L. S. 4320 (exp. 06-30-10) Date No. 4320 Exp. 6/30/2010 CHECKED by e Ar CAI~~ ` KERN COUNTY SU VEVORS OFFICE Date Approv Page 2 of 2 Ur=, i:,,,,L °EG ~a EXHIBIT 'Be 1~M.9UR~'n9R,. OFgR ANNEXATION NO. 601 RESOLUTION NO. _ HAGEMAN NO. 6 70 THE CITY OF BAKERSF O-D 19.72 ACRES I i (J) 60 I w . I t 527-02-0 HAGEAAAN ROAD ' L . 000 0' RADIAL I " .u.n yt,. M1hq 55 C] A / (5) 58911'157 J L rSJ OJ 0147' K 7)_500 ]5 'K 42A, i(2) 0-2. R-t4J0.OC' F~1430.00 \~'7l1w s / 30 {P L-171.84 L-115 rc 'E(8 g 1-86.02' i=058' \ I \ ~AyF _ / 519-020-06 L=527.05' \ IYII T. 482.06' ` I LOT LO! 21 521-020-11 SALES MAP F LANDS 0; 2q g SCCDONNQ. TN29 LAN R. 26 EANM D.M l01 27 L 4B Cp as t \\P \ K I 44`0, 9. r 6 'N (15) D-175' 26'34' ~t• ~Tx 'TRUE POINT OF 8(G-NC' 46 I 37' C D-=6 62'10'5' k-t 430.00' ~ •~R-`20,p0'`-\ \ 8-50.00• 8-25.00' 1=285.5 P' L-157.39' L-27.10'1 1-143.27 (11) 52602'48'M" 21 (18) N4416'06-w 1-1356.11' T-15.08'1 52]-010-0'5.86' 0e 87.91' GT l 3'f -u 04e 4e'415 (17) NE93r15'w 814.fi3' 1 R-_0~1) NB91 r15'w 421.65' 4L *PONT OF \ N891115"W 228.95`. coMME NcELErir I--- PARD~K= I I ----r ""rFl1O"n /(IZ) ac.NoN \ P5127DD' \ \ I I 7-75.88' I \ I I I I ~ I I \ \ \ PAR P.M CnEL 1 I V I . m1 I wcmr Ato4x r. \ \ P.M. BK. 53 PG. 110 i_ v A65-D1o-59 I I 1 1 I ~ I~ ~ T I \ \ ~T~ ~ I ' I PARCEL 1 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 31 oIU I P.M. 2755 \ \ i.M. BK. 11 PG. I~ II Ike \ \a \~9,(RQ L I OI 141 ~'m j 466-020- 1465-020-07 1465-020-08~ 001 a'S NOSEOALE \ D[-cl, D 1 IEOJ FF LOl t65M~B~ 2 PG. 9 PANCC MAP 10:'. P.M. BN. 53. 109 7 110 j j M4GR ~[F 4vfIaIE V c.o.c PER Doc. NO o m4,5]ose, oR \ ~ ~ 465-D2o-6L I I ~ I LEGENp t' PROJECT +ro BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13. 10WNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE COUNTY OF KERN, 4 I . STATE OF CALIFORNIA, '4L9M p M1 CLIENT/PROJECT 7 IL CR 5701 AIG HUMMEL t5 A $ : TXTU AVENUE 'ra 5701 U BAKERSFIELD. CA 93309 M° 4M° ! 1 VIC]NITY_,MAP I FOF4ESITE CONSULTING [ qI M sIS[eMmx q. _ P,O. BOM 81014 BAK[RSFIFLD. CA 93380-10- 2. t WN1[S w MIrtFF q0E c F41'NIC 5 p,ACI 10. 2-1- ATE. Ot-2e-09 ONE SHEET ONLY cfl 0 (j z m zz zw a » » 2 wco 0 w 0a U) m zz zz a zz x S9 i co U) 3 z °Z z a < co 06 w F- _ X C J J J J J W~ i W J W J J W W W E ~dd o`a agM§<D<D~¢wWw z-~zmz WU-WLL e ww wwoww~wwwwwwxlrcr zz zzzz 0.z~z~zztuww ww Qww~w gCU ca t7 C? zC9C9w(9~m~~Cw'1aWCw7WOM W U °Y to _ w Q U ° fA Ncl: W op m a' W .2 co Yo 4 C? o t= a xWz i } mx _ O0C U ¢ U z X 0 0 0 U V V U U U> U LU m J 0 0 Z A z _ ° a 0 Y d c LL U a it w c wz = Q ~lxzrzz z z z zzzoz m Z »U~W~ > > > »>jD p o0woso o 0 0 000§0 G <ql o E g w i c Ix ° c c o~ f, m ca> W Q a Q c g c ca > EEL m Qc c ~ ~ ►7i w c LD._ w cS ~m Z as iCL•u. vi U~ to ~ti g L f` caa m a~ cy m w Oa V N O ~y to c m I~ ui h .C N m l0 l0 r- y fl E m- OQ m m moo a L 0 C) a - m Y m . O m EN NU o rn~c 3 m vim coo 2-11 m C m m O :E Lu . Q. c w > m~ ov W. m a S22 m Lm c m~ M c m m 0 v Gi m m py C CL 0-0 - ma ~~ci~c 2m gc GO o m CO ,Q N O C O 2 T O co N m y t Gl - CL, y C Cis mN m c0 3 to C. _ cs LL m Ocm m v~ c c 0.0 a Q. 0 .Z ` L° _ 8 $ -0 ~ C $ ° 4 CM m 3 b m m ~i 3 ~r. a O Z $ m m Q= ~a 3 g m m iii o ~c c c ac m aZ 64mE LL we w2 W~ F-$cn U crI t m .c3 O c m Sd -0 m m cm 0 ~ w m m C c ly0 'o $ ° O mp a a 1 U m c d cm 'a ~ O .c9 m m mmm m a L? m C m V1 N ~O C w = m 41 p C C G O m LL O Cm m C C 0m s O C Q X .6 =r, Q E m t0 V 3 C. Y U E o m q c c o emQ$ t~ 3t'i ~o•- k; d m m2 c3` ;m mm Z fq D m Y m C w to 3 0 ca Lo -6 m1a ~mc Z~V mm t% c~3 a$ m ~~o cam a cm m BCDc 40 t-,m t m 3: m w C U1 ~t 'i°.. J d Ql c~ 3 P Q OL m.= 3 x m o r ~WlV 9 c •'t c~ m Cab c v c 3 ° m Z U a o m ~c mcov m $ o c m m o U ab $,m m ~v U } Z w Cc LO 0 r Iro ME .2 Z,? 0 -0 4c c d 72v C. a c_ o tv ° al a$ w c~ 5 m ci 0 0~,_, mE m~m H.I~ ~ go m3 a zo tm ao C $ X ~ Z U~, mcW ° ac c' m 4$ ~p a~ o OC- c gc a8 E W ~ °p U m$ u~ a O~ E ~M w m m to t$ 2 a 0m~ 44 H c~ V ;M c Am m ~ 00 a:.c~~ QaaVcm ~cc ~m~~~o, ~cri OC amo ~.m V30 ~ o' mU p CI m _ m m m t~ o m c b' 3 ao W m V~ E Z~ a Z9 f-c (D IL m a. 55 00 iro m -V r y L 1. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services At the time of any future develcornent, it is unlikely that additional police officers would be reauired to maintain the current level of city service The development of any public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance or sibility of the City but should not affect the existirm level of service 2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? Private development provides and pays four rn jar facilities and dedicates them to the City NO upgrading or change in facilities will be mguired in the territory for annexation 3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the property A (Exclusive Agriculture) Zone. 4. Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of Nvestodc on property, etc.)The City has pre-zoned the property per Ordinance 4491 to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone 5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. i Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services Parcels within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available City sewer system lines. The present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independent companies. No special assessments or charges for street sweepirw. leaf collection. street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's inoomorated area City government also provides increased political representation for the residents within the corporate limits. 6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.083970% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the CouMv for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 2009-2010 County Auditor-Controllers 2009 Lien Date). 7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain. No. the last listed (1992-93) City bounded indebtedness has been paid off and the current tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness. 8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00? The property rate will not increase due to annexation and reassessment will not occur due to annexation. 9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existing annexation area is not subiect to a Williamson Act Contract -3- J3;~ SAANNEXATIONIANNEX SOIWxhibd C.000 ~c .h `1