HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 105-10RESOLUTION NO. 1 05- 10
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 601
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAGEMAN
ROAD AND ALLEN ROAD, EAST OF THE A.T. & S. F.
RAILROAD TRACKS. (WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to
wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory,
pursuant to Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located at the
southeast corner of Hageman Road and Allen Road, east of the A.T. & S. F. Railroad
tracks; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit
"B" for the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as
though fully set forth herein, located at the southeast corner of Hageman
Road and Allen Road, east of the A.T. & S. F. Railroad tracks.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653
of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and
made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization
Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for
annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
o~ OAK6-
~ m
r
ORI(4ONAL
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was
adopted by the City Council and the environmental document for the
annexation is determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal.
That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of a
negative declaration as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the
Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the
City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be
given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
Roberta Gafford
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution,
with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield,
California 93309.
---------000--------
2
JORICINIAL
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
SEP 0 8 2010
by the following vote:
AYES' COUNCILMEMBER: CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, COUCH, HA SON, SULLIVAN, V-1 SCR VI NER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: n b l(~
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: (N Q '(\9
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: nnrg--
4461,~~
ROBERTA GAFFORD, C
CITY CLERK and Ex Offi io Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
SEP 0 8 2010
MAYOR of the City of Bakers
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
i
EXHIBITS: A - Legal Description
B - Map
C - Plan for Services
3
rrt
r
ORIGINAL
Exhibit "A"
HAGEVIAN NO.6
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 601
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being a ponion ofLots 25, 2t3, and 27 of'Saies Map of Lands of Kern County Land Company for
Section 13. 1 ownship 29 South. Range 26 Fast. KD.M., as shown. on :nap recorded in the office of the
County Recorder of Kern County, more particularhy described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 13;
Thence North 00°4248" East, along the west line of the southwest quarter of said Section 13 a distance
of 62,08 feet to a point on the northeasterly right of way line of the A.T.&S.F. Railroad, 100.00 feet
wide, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINI\ZNG;
1. Tlsence continuing along said west line, North 00442'48" East 508.01 feet to a point on the
southerly right of way line of liageman Road (Co. Rd. No. 3264), 60.00 feet wide, said point
being the beginning of a non-tangent cure concave to the south having a radius of 1370.00 feet, a
radial line to said point bears North 08°35'03" West;
2. Thence easterly along said curve and right of way through a central angle of 02°30'41" an arc
distance of 60.05 feet to a point of departure from said curve, a radial line to said point bears
North 06°04'22" West;
3. Thence along said radial line North 06104'22" West 60.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of
way line of Hageman Road. 60.00 feet wide, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent
curve concave to the south having a radius of 1430.00 feet to which a radial bears North 6°04'22"
West;
4. Thence easterly along said curve and northerly right of way, through a central angle of 06°53'0 7"
an arc distance of 171.84 feet;
5. Thence tangent to said curve South 89°11' 15" East 421.22 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve
concave to the south having a radius of 1430.00 feet;
6. Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 00°02'47" an arc distance of].] 5 feet
to a point on the existing City of Bakersfield boundary and a point of departure from said
northerly right of way line, a radial line to said point bears North 00°51'32" East;
7. Thence along said boundary, South 00°47'53" West 60.00 feet to a point on the southerly right of'
way line of Hageman Road, 60.00 feet wide said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve
concave to the southwest having a radius of 1370.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears North
00°51'41" East;
8. Thence southeasterly along said southerly right of way line and curve and along said boundary,
through a central angle of 38°46' 15" an are distance of 927.05 feet to the beginning of a reverse
curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1430.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears
South 39°37'56" West;
Page l of 2
o`` 0AKF9~
m
r
r)RIMNAI
9. Thence southeasterly along said curve and said boundary through a central angle of 11126'34" an
arc distance of 285.59 feet to the point of beginning of E. reverse curve concave to the west having
a radius of 20.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of reverse curve bears South 28°11'221"
West;
10. Thence departing said houndan7 southeasterly, southefy and southwesterly along said curve
through a central angle 0188,01 '26"an are distance of _;0.73 ieet. to a point on the northerly right
of way line of Paddock Place. 60 feet wide;
IL . Thence tangent to said curve and along said northerly live of Paddock Place, South 26°12'48''
West 5.86 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of
120.00 feet;
12. Thence southwesterly and westerly along said curve and northerly line of Paddock Place, through
a central angle of 64035'57" an are distance of 135.30 feet;
13. Thence tangent to said curve North 89°11' 15" West 421.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 25.00 feet;
14. Thence westerly and northwesterly along said curve thn:)ugh a central angle of 62°10'55" an arc
distance of 27.13 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the southeast having a radius
of 50.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of reverse curve bears North 62°59'40" East;
15. Thence northwesterly, westerly and southerly along said curve through a central angle of
175'46'3T' an arc distance of 153.39 feet, to a point of departure from said curve and said
northerly line of Paddock Place, said point being on the north line of Parcel I of Parcel Map No.
1107 1, as shown on map recorded in Parcel Map Book 53, at Pages 109 & 110 in the office of
said County Recorder, a radial line from said curve bears North 67°13'03" East;
16. Thence along the north line of said parcel, North 89°11' 15" West 228.95 feet;
17. Thence continuing, along the south line of the southwest quarter of said Section 13,
North 89°11'1S" West 814.63 feet;
18. Thence along the northerly right of way of the AT & SF Railroad North 44°16'08"West a distance
of 87.91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 19.72 acres
C-M
PrNm A0 Charles A. Reuter, L.S. 4320 (exp. 06-30-10) Date 4320
6/30/2010 /
CHECKED by~6F CAS
KERN COUNT( SlJ EYORS OFFICE
Date 3 ~
Approv
Page 2 of 2
o~0AKF9~
a ~
M
'r1~r;~NA
biFGKt'.'p
I9WjSAM'i 5Ort~Ct
OWe 3%,~~
AP° nc q
EXHIBIT "B"
ANNEXATION NO. 601 RESOLUTION NO.
HAGEMAN NO. 6
10 THE CITY OF SAKERSFTEL.D
19.72 ACRES
H CE#AN ROAD
(3) AXO 22'W f„ _02f) l c
~ ~
00' F
DIA
~
o
MO ,
55 <
99
~ C
-
.
.
60.
A
_
_ , ( 5 1 SB91113E 121.27' S
1
. h
Ii
1 8'
,
,
6 L'
/
- _
(4) D-6' 0217'
53'0"
Kill
- -(2) D-:.
F.143U.00' RF 143(1.00' -
15'
,8
~L£~I I~ 'sq~ /
t'
3O
L-1.
S6'
' r=0
'
'7
F
=137DOO
.
7.66.02
(6) D-36
'
•
46
15
\ \
163002
8=1370.00'
'
- 0 ~
,
'
^
L=927.05
7.182.06•
.
•
~
529-D70- t,,.
.
LOT 25
527-020-I1 SALES MAP Qf IINL`:
U"
LOT 2E
521-010-01
\ ` ~MBgOJ r
.
KERN COUNTY IANI: r.IMF '
w
LOT 27 "o735y4
-
SCC TiON 13, r 29 R 2C I M D v.
~_M C sS
° x(10) D.Q~
' (9) D-11' \`•1
'
(15) D-175'
•
s
(14) 26'34'
`
0'~
`
'
'.'E POINT Of
BEGINNING'
46'37•
R=50.00'
153
39'
L
~Re
i0.0
,
D=E21D'S5' k=1.30.00
F=25.00 t=265.59'
1.2710' 7=143.27 (il) 526.12'46'W ~a19.32` _
/
:
.
x=135611' \
1=,S
s
e'
yp
(1
'\~r; 6) Ns.1E'06•w
.
-
alo
NcJ,3b]T
.e
.y
52]-o,0-o,
-"PF)!u~
Fi_ soo.e.aw .a a
L
s
.
e
67.91
(16)~
,
,
rtiSuiT /
td _
q+V7F
/r 4 R[
(13) NF911't5'W 411
St--
65•- -
•
(17) .8911'15•W 6,..63
N891115 W 225.95`
)
,M,
~
_
.
'
e
^
'
'Po91T OF
A
'
, _ _ T___-.__, i _ (
~
_
yY!
?
1• _
90M~EIICE-fN1
N3
Ic
T.xx s., xx s. uuu
\
I
I
L-135
3(1
\
I
.
T.75.96•
x
\
A 111
R CE071 I
I P,M
BK. 53 PG. 110
I i I MCTLE AMID
K.`
I 465-020-59
n ~
I I I I I I
\ \j
o
I PARCEL 1 PARCLL 2 PARCEL 31 I A,16
PM 2355
BK. 1 PG. 11 I
u
\
I
1 A65-020-06 465-020-07 I.65-020-061
\ 01 5I14ATE
U0f R'S kOSEDAIL \ I-ARCEL
D REMAINDER
MAP 11071
I 1
WGMUOUI AY£IWr
. 9 P.M SK. 53.
101 16 MIL. 2P G
O C. PCP 00C.
PCS. 109 k 110
N0. 204157056. 0 R.
I
I
_
I ,
\
I
\
465
•
-020-60
I
LEGEND
w
-
BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13.
7OWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M D.M., IN THE COUNTY OF KERN,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
CLIENT /PFOJECT
CRAIG HUMML•
j
5701 TROXION AVFNOI
6AKERSFIELD. CA 933'L
EN(:JNEER
LIRESITE CONSULTINL
P.O. BOX 51L'.,
BAKERSTITLD CA 93380-1014
hAPHIC Sc AI.F
..y__._
_'L o,R°F2`Pp,ct,
y`IS x c
6 ~ C
,o-LJ~~ y<Frwa a V
[s A Rlrt[F r.
r
OWE Si C)i V •1 C;
cJRIGINAI
VICINITY MAP
to .n -0 r ~ m
rn
wo -n
G O Q t9
03' 0
(A
7
(D O v
(D '0 CD
n
o =r :3 2
W
CL
.
o
m o :3
n
~
n
o
CD
0%
a
O
'
C
l
D
U)
m
i
t
zn
M
roD
0
p0
n p2O
2'
py0
~t~
O
Z Z~~m2
0
C: CZ
~
ZZ ~
~ ?
~ ~-n'~ ~N
3
=
Z:I
Z
y
_
m
M
M
'fl T
m
N
m
'0
~
v -C T O
O
N
ro
r
n p rn 0,-4 o
C')
e- 0
O i
C: -4 z
~
ms
~
0_
x o
s
z m ;
9
0
.
m
o
°
-
-n G z
m G) m m
cvi,uvimz7<z mmmmmvm~m
2
~~~OtnmZmZ~pGGD T, r
rnm,rmvr~mj,ry ~-4
rnmmNZ~ZO v
~ - D << <<
> fit- cn mm 7-
m m -{Qo ~yy cC _
~ ~ X NU
m
-v
Z
m
V
O
o Z
N
N
D
CD
ca = cNo
46
to
X
n
Z
z
m
G1
9Z
~2
zz
O
Oa
rn~
OF
-4 W a
m om ~m :E °~~~-1
n zr ml Q o C
O N z s s C3
z 0 o N y m
av nCD rL a
Z W 1D M <
ca a a -
C-) dC
C) ° o O m y
a.
a g~ cD? L7
wQo=
30
n fNC O O: Im (A
tD t
n m O % ¢ tD G mo
C zr to
D i < N S C
C7 2 gza O.- Q
_
M Cr
3K
n =r _
W Ot 3 'vim 3
- IV
7 N O fly. N G3
l 0 N
Z
o CL
m a
W 7 - C
A: D (Q
O
j
A tD C
3: zr
N tD_: N to M N tD
l m ¢ 3 n {D
K 0
C--
r-
~
m~-~ ~mo
0 mD -0
~
0
-4
o
.
O
E.z~ o C~cD rn
M
_0
¢
K
O
tD ~
O W z (a
~ tOD
O
~0
N
0
O
j (13 ~J W O _
c
2 W
N
n ~m a m -
C
u
Q
-DCnp~
ID am C
~n
;2
off= cammfl
p
~
;
0
`x
0 (D -ri 00 a <
O
; o
~
gi
~
0
.
.
(
~pp
T O= a a
- iU
~
N
Ou
-0 =r roo<
3
m :3 Mro (D 0
CD (D
a
W
CL,
wC
40 "
c
l=a
a) (D
ro
X
=
r
O
su -1
a ~
fll
go
O
y
K ~
?S
.~"C 3
!D
O
C!1
C
C7
N
Q N N n1
O
C
O
--o
s? m O
CL
O m
3
- 3 s;
W
0
0~
~
C T
N
(n m =
!D3
c
o
co
0
0
O p
C
ty
O !A a
0 to
n 0
1
r
➢
cn
O
c
tD
G
D
0
O
ni
A
=
m
m
~
o
n
7~
A
A
c
o~
O N
X
MX
C
O
•
.
D
Q
to
O
-0 D
{D
O C
-
D
~
a'
A
N
t
D
N
~ ~ ~
a. to M
N 2
fD
t7
K
T O
O
(D
N f~D
41
N C>
X
O
C Vj
n
cn
Q
N
w
W
O
0
O
O
.O
C
Q
N
O
7
N
Q
fD
o m
x
ty 0
fD
= ca
O '
V
p
0 0
0 ~
cp
N
C
N
O
d
O
C
41
fD
O
.O
tD
.mow
J
M M 0
mt~r
ow
OaD_
Wo
X T3
N
<
3 0
o ~
0 m
-
lu
0 -0 co
- 0-p R
w 03
M
o
(D
o
m m
:3
w =
m Q] 3
R ? mow
0
to
3
t°
~m0
2 ~
=r
flt M 0
~ 3 K
< w
ro
X
Q
0
m ~
ro
r
CL
D
.
N
x
~W
o
0.
j
rn,S
?
N
or x-0
0
K 0-
0
0 t~
CD
o rp
m O .0
t0 fl.
0.
0O
O d
O
C
O
~O+
'S1 N
N
y
2. -i
fnD m
g
N ~
? m
:x O N
o Q fD O
C► X O
c A ro w: 0
0m$}02'0_cp m
SD r- 01
-n O 0G7
,m < c r
N 3 ri I`►
W nm
<~-~K0m
O C j 0 -0=
< M to O- < AQ
M a N N
-N 7 O SD n
CD -a)-
--3 ;2
!v M
~ ^ N
X
3
ro K
~+C O
v .
O (A
o~~PKF9`~-n
m
p- r
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of cityldistrict
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to
provide needed services. At the time of anv future development. it is unlikely that additional
police officers would be reouired to maintain the current level of city service. The develooment of
anv public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance
responsibility of the Citv but should not affect the existino level of service.
2 Would cityidistrict require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fire hydrants. mains. etc.): If so. would city(distria. or residents be responsible for financing?
Private development orovioes anc oavs for major facilities and dedicates them to the Citv No
upgrading or change in facilities will be reouired in the territory for annexation
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Countv zoned the orooerty A (Exclusive
Agriculture) Zone.
4, Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.)The City has
pre-zoned the orooertv per Ordinance 4491 to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone.
5. List cityldistrict services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Polioe
should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present Countv Sheriff services. Parcels
within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available Citv sewer svstem lines. The
present Citv refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now oav to
independent companies. No sioecial assessments or charoes for street sweeping. leaf collection,
street lighting enerav costs and fire hvdrants when located within the Citv's incoprorated area.
Citv oovemment also provides increased oolitical representation for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area eouals 1.083970% of assessed
market value. This represents the total orooertv tax rate. When annexed a desionated
percentaae of the total oroperty tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the
County for orovidino health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 2009-2010 County
Auditor-Controllers 2009 Lien Date).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain.
No, the last listed (1992-93) Citv bounded indebtedness has been said off and the current tax
rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The prooertv rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to,
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existino annexation area is
not subiect to a Williamson Act Contract
SAANNEXATIOMANNEX 6MExhibd C.DOC
-3-
gPKF
> m
c
`'naI ,INAI_