HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 127-10RESOLUTION NO. 127- 10
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OFTERRITORYTO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 627,
LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF STINE ROAD,
GENERALLY BETWEEN MCKEE ROAD AND TAFT
HIGHWAY. (WARD 7).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit,
the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of
Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located along the east
side of Stine Road, generally between McKee Road and Taft Highway; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of the territory have consented to annexation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B"
for the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though
fully set forth herein, located along the east side of Stine Road, generally
between McKee Road and Taft Highway.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a
part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization
Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation
in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners
of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and
to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was
adopted by the City Council and an environmental document for the
annexation is determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal.
J
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of a
negative declaration as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act
have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government
Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to have 100% of property owner consenting to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City
of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be
given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
Roberta Gafford
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution,
with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield,
California 93309.
---------000--------
2
J~
. J
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
NOV o 3 2ma
by the following vote:
V/' V/ V-1, ~gY_~,5f COUNCILMEMBER: CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, SULL V-11 V-1
N, SCRIV R
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: AOl~Q
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: YIO.
BSEN . COUNCILMEMBER: C hlaCY~ NCh1,
~gL2~- ~Zxd~
ROBERTA GAFFORD, CIAO
CITY CLERK and Ex Of Iclo Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfi
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
EXHIBITS: A - Legal Description
B-Map
C - Plan for Services
DL:dc\\S:\Annexo ion\Res of Applic\ROA 627.doc
3
.r,
ti
APPROVED NOV 0 3 2010
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ANNEXATION NO. 627
STINE NO. 16
4.78 ACRES
THAT PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST Y, OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 30 SOUTH,
RANGE 27 EAST, M.D.M., COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF LOT 24
IN SAID SECTION 35 ACCORDING TO "KERN COUNTY SALES MAP NO.1 OF LANDS OF J.B. HAGGIN" FILED
FOR RECORD MAY 3,1889 IN THE OFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER, SAID LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENTED WEST X CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 24 AND IS ALSO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE
CENTERLINES OF McKEE ROAD AND STINE ROAD;
THENCE S. 00'35'25" W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 24 AND SAID STINE ROAD CENTERLINE,
987.67 FEET,
THENCE S. 89°04'14" E., 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID STINE
ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT OF THE EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
(1) THENCE CONTINUING S. 89°04'14" E. ALONG SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE, 630.67 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 24, SAID POINT ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN
SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE;
(2) THENCE S. 00°34'35" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 24 AND SAID CORPORATE
BOUNDARY LANE, 330.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 24;
(3) THENCE N. 89°04'14" W. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 24, 630.66 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID STINE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT
ON SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE;
(4) THENCE N. 00°34'25" E. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND CORPORATE
BOUNDARY LINE, 330.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
CHECKED by
KERN COUNTY SUR VEYO OFFICE
Date 7/ ~0
roved
AICKEE ROAD
ROAD N0. 191)
+ESr 1/a cw9J1 Sx n
.JOS. R.ZIG, IL9AL
I
I of I
I "s I
I ~
I I J9 I
I AI I
I s ~
I I
I I I
I ~
TRACT NO. 6260 - UNIT ONE
MAP BOOK 52, PACE 54 I
I
POINT OF BEGINNING I
I
I
/
/
/
I
I
No
I
I
I
(
I
I
J
6J'
RIBBON GRASS
DRIVE
~
a
I
I
~
I
a
I
I
TRACT No. 6260 - UNR ONE I
A
J
A
MAP BOOK 52, PAGE 54 I
I
~
I
I
I
a
I
I
~
PORNTION OF LOT 21
KERN COUTY AP NO. 1
of THE U1)109 or M J.B. HAGiC4N
APN 1 514-020-01
CRY OF BAKf"FIELD ANNEXATION NO. 450
M9KEE N0. 2
RESOLUTION NO. BDS-142154
JULY 14, 2005
981u'r,E O) SWAT
I
I
F
_ L_ONEROC_K_
I I AVENUE
I ~
I
I
I
I
TRACT No. 56/4 - PHASE 5
MAP BOOK $2, PACE 54 - -
~I
V i APN : 514020-09 ^ - - - -
_
PORTION OF LOT'!{ ` IDLEROCK _
KERN COUNTY SALES MAPAMO 1
I j I
W I OF THE LANDS OF J.B. HACdN f AVENUE
nl
:I \
I zl
I
1
1
I
I
1
I I N99W1{'9 9]699'
c ~
C I
APN $14-190-05 r APN 1 514-190-01 I APN 1 914-020-1o
PORTION of LOT 25 Y I e Alf.B LOT 29 S PORTION KERN Co L IT SALES MAP NO. 1 Y KERN COUNTY MAP NO. 1 I KERN COUNTY SALE MAP NO. 1
OF THE (ANDS OF J.B. HAGON G OF THE (ANDS OI J.B. W1WN i OF THE LANDS of J.B. O)N
CRY of RAKERSMIJ ANNEXATION NO. Sao
G AKERS NO.4
/ RESOLUTION N033-91
V MARCH i 2, 1991
C I
Y, I
I
I
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ANNEXATION NO. 627
RESOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION OF STINE NO. 16
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
4.78 ACRES A
CHEIXm BY
KLAN COUNTY SURVEYOIYS DITICE
DAVE:
APPROVED BY.
adabb
NowTM
GRAPHIC SCAIR
"111"""""' 1111 PROPOSED CORPORATE BOUNDARY
4ZZZ1Z11Z1Zy EXISTING CORPORATE -BOUNDARY
(1) LEGAL COURSE DESCRIPTION
A.P.N. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER
@
'1981919
4
.a9E
AVO"
g
.
ROPOSED
ANNEXATION
TAET
ROIVMY
dft
VICINITY MAP
KT.S
EXHIBIT H
NO.
e
i
e+
c;1~ r Y ,
S
ANNEXATION NO. 627
STINE NO. 16
EXHIBIT"C"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
SERVICES
Agency Which Presently Provides
Check Services Which City/District
Indicate Flow Services Provide
Sgrvice
Will Provide
Upon Future Date
Annexation (specify)
d
City/District will be Financed (i.e.
general tax rate or spogjal
assessment.)
Planning
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks and Recreation
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Libra
COUNTY
COUNTY
N/A
Police Protection
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Fire Protection
CITY
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES, FIRE
FUND
Street
COUNTY
CITY
_
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Construction
BY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
Maintenance
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Sweeping
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Lighting
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Flood Control
COUNTY
CITY
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage
COUNTY
CITY See Page 2
USER FEE & PRVT. DVMT.
Water
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
USER FEE
Other REFUSE
COUNTY
CITY
USER FEE
S:WNNEXATIONWnnex 6271Exhibt C.DOC
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location Service Level Capacity
Indicate location from which service Indicate frequency and availability
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire of service (i.e., street sweeping,
station, library, etc.) response time for emergency services,
l tr-. i v lama, aw.
POLICE-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through 24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this
the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00
Street approximately 8 miles east of the annexation. minutes or less.
FIRE-Service will be provided by City Station No. 13 located at 4900 Stine Road Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The
pursuant to exchange wherein the City protects certain property within the annexation will not affect City or County Fire service
County's jurisdiction. Station is approximately 2 miles north of the annexation. capability or response time.
PARKS AND RECREATION - The annexation project is within the jurisdiction of Existing neighborhood Parks (City and County) are open
the City of Bakersfield Recreation and Park Department and is subject to all to the public at reasonable hours
adopted requirements and standards of the district.
LIBRARY- Area is served by Kern County Library System.
Existing libraries are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
STREET- The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99 (see below)
will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public
Works efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING- Maintenance and There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City
personnel will be dispatched from the City Corporation Yard on a regular basis to provide the necessary public work services to this area.
for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets, Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed".
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting when located within the City's
right of way.
SEWER- The territory can be served by the City trunk sewer line in McCutchen
Road which is directed to City Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 111.
WATER-The territory is within the California Water Service Company service
area and no change will occur upon annexation.
OTHER-(Refuse)-When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by
City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is once or twice a week.
Y c~ 2 -
r , S~ANNEXATIONIAnnex 6271Exhibit C.DOC
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities,
etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to
provide needed services. At the time of any future development, it is unlikely that additional
police officers would be reauired to maintain the current level of city service. The development of
any public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance
responsibility of the City but should not affect the existing level of service.
2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads,
fine hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing?
Private development provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. 'No
upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the property A (Exclusive
Agriculture) Zone.
4. Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The City has
are-zoned the property per Ordinance 3819 to City A (Agriculture) Zone.
5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police
should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. Parcels
within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available City sewer system lines. The
present City refuse collection rate is substantially kr*w than fees county residents now pay to
independent companies. No special assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection.
street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's incorporated area.
City government also provides increased political representation for the residents within the
corporate limits.
6. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.0900270% of assessed
market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated
percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the Cay and remainder to the
County for providing health care and social services. (Date as shown on 2010-2011 County
Auditor-Controllers 2010 Lien Date).
7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain.
No. the last listed (1992-93) City bounded indebtedness has been paid off and the current tax
rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.
9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existing annexation area is
not subject to a Williamson Act Contract.
SAANNEXATION1Annex 627\Exhibd CDOC
-3-
e
r