HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/03/11 RDA AGENDABAKERSFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
" REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2011
Conference Room A,
City Hall North
1600 Truxtun Avenue
4:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Minutes of the November 8, 2010 regular meeting.
b. Approval of department payments from October 22, 2010 to December 16,
2010 in the amount of $829,185.21.
C. Financial Audit Reports for the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
1. Component Unit Financial Report (CUFR)
2. Management Letter
Staff recommends approval of Consent Calendar items 3.a. through 3.c.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Public Hearing to consider Resolution of Necessity to determine public interest
and necessity for acquisition of certain real property located at 600-602 18m
Street (Leach Property) by Eminent Domain for Redevelopment Purposes.
(Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.230)
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution.
5. REPORTS
a. Update status of Baker Street Mixed Use Project.
b. Update status of Mill Creek Area Projects.
6. DEFERRED BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Resolution establishing the dates of meetings for the Bakersfield
Redevelopment Agency for the months of January through December 2011.
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
7. NEW BUSINESS (cont'd)
b. Election of Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency Chairperson and Vice-
Chairperson for Calendar Year 2011.
Staff recommends conducting election in accordance with Bakersfield
Redevelopment Agency By-laws.
8. AGENCY STATEMENTS
9. CLOSED SESSIONS
10. WORKSHOPS
11. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Alan Tand
Executive Director
BA E
~ywVOef RiS
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
C "
AL1F0
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM: 3.a.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
Roberta Gafford, Secretary
December 23, 2010
Minutes of the November 8, 2010 regular meeting.
APPROVED
DEPARTMENT HEAD T
GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the minutes.
BACKGROUND:
A
.y ~
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM: 3.6.
TO: Bakersfield RDA APPROVED
FROM: Nelson K. Smith, Finance Officer DEPARTMENT HEAD
DATE: December 17, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Approval of department payments from October 22, 2010 to December 16/2010
in the amount of $829,185.21.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of payments totaling $829,185.21.
BACKGROUND:
Individual payments exceeding $3,500 in the above total are listed below.
California Eminent Domain Law Grou
Professional services eragreement BRDA #08-018
BK Transmissions
Leasehold and Security Deposit
Union Bank NA
Mill Creek Phase 56 eragreement # 10-013
HPS Mechanical Inc.
Mill Creek Phase 513 eragreement # 10-013
PG&E
Deposit for Building 4 of Creekview Villas
Aleshire & W nder LLP
Professional services era mnt #09-009
Housing Authority of the Count of Kern
Baker Street Village Phase I eragreement RA # 10-003
Creekview Villas LLC
Disbursement requests era rmt #RA09-001
Merc Housing of California
Pa ment era reement RA #09-005
Downtown Business & Property Assoc.
Christmas Tree Li ht installation eragreement BRDA # 10-020
Union Bank NA
Mill Creek Phase 56 era reement #10-013
HPS Mechanical Inc.
Mill Creek Phase 513 eragreement # 10-013
SAKim GWDMIN-BRDA\ADMIN-BRDA-AP-201 AADWN-BRDA-AP-1-3-1 Ldoc
4,457.90
19,979.00
13,216.10
118,944.93
5,000.00
4,554.00
197,260.09
354,285.37
25,978.32
10,000.00
5,342.87
48,085.78
1
BA
O~~COIPORAl(~ "S l"
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
c~LIFO
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM: -3, C-.
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Nelson K. Smith, Finance Officer DEPARTMENT HEAD
DATE: December 8, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DI
SUBJECT: Financial Audit Reports for the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency for the fi
June 30, 2010.
1. Component Unit Financial Report (CUFR).
2. Management Letter.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Component Unit Financial Report be received and filed.
BACKGROUND:
APPROVED
ended
1. Attached is the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency's Component Unit Financial Report (CUFR)
Commonly referred to as the Agency's Annual Audit Report, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
The CUFR represents the Agency's financial statements as of June 30, 2010 which are audited by
the accounting firm of Brown Armstrong Paulden McCown Starbuck Thornburgh & Keeter.
2. Attached is the Management Letter from the accounting firm of Brown Armstrong Paulden
McCown Starbuck Thornburgh & Keeter. There were no significant audit findings and no difficulties
in performing the audit.
December 9, 2010, 11:18AM
S:WdminWdmin Reports\2010 RDA CUFR.doc
BA k.
OF~cosron,r
U ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
cgLIFO `y~P
BAKERSFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Hearings
ITEM: q. o~ .
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency APPROVED
FROM: Joshua H. Rudnick, Deputy Agency Counsel DEPARTMENT HEAD /14~
DATE: December 15, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Hearing on Resolution of Necessity to determine the public interest and ne essity for
acquisition of certain real property located at 600-602 18th Street, Bakersfield,
California (Leach property), by Eminent Domain for Redevelopment Purposes.
(Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.230)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
BACKGROUND:
Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.230 requires that the Redevelopment Agency adopt "a
Resolution of Necessity" authorizing the initiation of an eminent domain action. Section
1245.230 also requires that certain "pre-condemnation" requirements be met. Each of
these requirements has been met, as set forth below, and is set forth in the Resolution.
In order to adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the Agency must find and
determine that:
A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project;
B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible
with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
C. The property is necessary for the proposed project;
D. The offers required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code were
made to the owners of record of the subject properties; and
S:\Edcd\RDA(CDDA)\10-11 RDAAdmins\RON-Leach1-3-11.doc
12/15/2010 10:08 AM
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Page 2
E. The proposed project is a more necessary public use than any existing public
use.
The hearing on the proposed Resolution relates only to items A, B, C, D, and E above as
they may apply to the property sought to be acquired.
In addition, under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1240.610, to the extent any portion
of the project site is currently utilized for public use, the Redevelopment Agency may
only acquire that interest to the extent the proposed project is a more necessary public
use than the existing public use. The hearing on the proposed Resolution will accordingly
relate to the more necessary public use issue as well. California Code of Civil Procedure
§1240.610 requires reference to that section in the Resolution of Necessity if the
Redevelopment Agency seeks to acquire a property interest as a more necessary public
use.
The Project
The Mill Creek Linear Park Project (The Mill Creek Project)/Sister Cities Garden Project
("Project") is proposed to redevelop certain property, including the elimination of blight,
within the Old Town Kern-Pioneer Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Old Town Kern-Pioneer Redevelopment Project
("Redevelopment Plan"), adopted June 30, 1999.
The Project consists of transformation of an existing canal into a "natural" creek, park
improvements and the construction of the Sister Cities Garden. The Project will be
constructed in multiple phases, but the redevelopment of the property described herein
is scheduled to begin within two years from acquisition.
Environmental Studies
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study was
performed to evaluate the environmental effects of the Project. The Initial Study has
shown that the proposed Project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of
the human environment (Finding of No Significant Impact). Accordingly, a Negative
Declaration was approved. Additional project information is contained in the
Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of Bakersfield, Economic and
Community Development Department.
DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency has before it a proposed Resolution of Necessity to acquire
the subject property which is legally described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached to the
proposed Resolution, and which property is identified as Kern County Assessor's Parcel
Number 006-091-03; County of Kern, California. The property is commonly known as and
generally located at 600 - 602 18th Street, Bakersfield, County of Kern, California. The
Resolution authorizes the acquisition of the subject property by exercise of eminent
domain.
S:\Edcd\RDA(CDDA)\10-11 RDAAdmins\RON-Leach1-3-11.doc
12/15/201010:08 AM
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page3
The proposed Project would entail acquisition/relocation of approximately two
commercial units. Under state law, the Redevelopment Agency is obligated to provide
relocation assistance to all persons who qualify for assistance under the State Relocation
Assistance Law and its guidelines. Relocation assistance consultants have contacted all
occupants to provide information about relocation assistance benefits.
A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project.
The Project is intended to eliminate blight by revitalizing property.
B. The Project is Planned or Located in the Manner that Will Be Most
Compatible With the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury.
The purpose of the Redevelopment Plan is to improve the quality of life for residents and
business enterprises within the Old Town Kern-Pioneer Redevelopment Project Area.
Acquisition and assembly of properties for revitalization is consistent with the
Redevelopment Plan's strategic objectives resulting in the elimination of blight. The
owner and occupants of the Subject Property may be entitled to compensation for the
property acquired, as well as relocation benefits.
C. The Property is Necessary for the Proposed Project
The Project requires the assembly of properties within the project site, including the
property that is the subject of the proposed Resolution of Necessity. The acquisition of
this property and development consistent with the Redevelopment Plan's objectives to
eliminate blight is the proposed Project. This property is necessary for the construction of
the Project.
D. The Offer Required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code
Was Made to the Owner of Record of the Subject Property.
The Agency engaged an independent licensed appraiser to appraise the property and
to determine just compensation based on the property's "Fair Market Value." A written
offer at the full amount of appraised just compensation was made to the property owner
on or about June 15, 2010. The offer included an Appraisal Summary Statement and
other information required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. The
offer process included subsequent negotiations with the property owner that were
unsuccessful, including a counter-offer made by the Agency.
E. The Proposed Project is a More Necessary Public Use Than Any Existing Public
Use.
There are no public uses on the Project site of which staff is aware other than possible
utility and right of way easements. The proposed Project is a more necessary public use
S:\Edcd\RDA(CDDA)\10-11 RDAAdmins\RON-Leach1-3-11.doc
12/15/201010:08 AM
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Page 4
than any existing public uses, as such other public uses may be accommodated while
allowing the Redevelopment Agency's Project to move forward.
ADDITIONAL MATTERS
In order for the property owner(s) to appear before the Agency, they must have filed a
written request to appear and be heard within fifteen (15) days after the notice was
mailed or served. (Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.235(a) (b) (3) Failure to file a written
request results in the waiver of the right to appear and be heard.
The Redevelopment Agency must adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a vote of two-
thirds of all the members of the Agency (not two-thirds of a quorum of the members
present). (Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.240).
GB:JHR/Isc
S:\Edcd\RDA(CDDA)\10-11 RDA Admins\RON-Leach1-3-1 tdoc
12/15/201010:08 AM
BA
o~ yro..o.,~Rs
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
M
LIFO
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Reports
ITEM: 5. o3
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency APPROVED
FROM: Donna L. Kunz, Deputy Executive Director DEPARTMENT HEAD
DATE: December 20, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Update status of Baker Street Mixed Use Project
RECOMMENDATION:
No action required,
BACKGROUND:
Staff will provide an update on the Baker Street Mixed Use Project.
S:\Admins\RDA\RDA Admins 2011 \Baker Street Update 010311.Docx
12/20/2010 8:22 AM
Cg
BA
O~ywvu4 S
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
LIFO
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2011 AGENDA SECTION: Reports
ITEM: 5.)0.
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Donna L. Kunz, Deputy Executive Director
DATE: December 20, 2010
SUBJECT: Update status of Mill Creek Area Projects
APPROVED
DEPARTMENT HEAD
GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "
RECOMMENDATION:
No action required.
BACKGROUND:
Staff will provide an update on Millcreek Area Projects,
S:\Admins\RDA\RDA Admins 2011\Millcreek Update 010311.Docx
December 20, 2010, 8:34AM
cg
11A
OFycouoeAre s
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
cyLL
MEETING DATE: December 13, 2010 AGENDA SECTION: New Business
ITEM: 1. q ,
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency Members APPROVED
FROM: Roberta Gafford, City Clerk DEPARTMENT HEAD T
DATE: November 16, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Resolution establishing the dates of meetings for the Bakersfield Rede elopment
Agency for the months of January through December 2011.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
BACKGROUND:
This Resolution sets the regular Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency meeting dates for the
2011 calendar year.
All regular meetings will be held on the second Monday of the month, at 1600 Truxtun
Avenue, Conference Room A, at 4:00 p.m. The annual meeting is scheduled for Monday,
January 3, 2011, in accordance with Redevelopment Agency By-laws.
pl
December 27, 2010, 12:29PM
S:\BRDA\ADMINS\2010\2011 calendar admin.dot
Ka h'p~j .
01
O~ Nf ORAtOk
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 3, 201 1 AGENDA SECTION: New Business
ITEM: -1.b.
TO: Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency APPROVED
FROM: Roberta Gafford, City Clerk DEPARTMENT HEAD T
DATE: December 27, 2010 GENERAL COUNSEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Election of Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency Chairperson and Vice-Chaff person
for Calendar Year 2011.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends conducting election in accordance with Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
By-laws.
BACKGROUND:
The adopted By-laws for the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency stipulate that the Chairperson
and Vice-Chairperson be elected during the Agency's January meeting. Term of office is one
year.
S:\BRDA\ADMINS\2011\election of chair & vice chair 2011.doc
jo