Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13004 STOCKDALE HWY IN33 o IE c9 6 a�85 R� S W RCB,January 2002 Page A—of v Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intanded for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systams. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested The completed form, written test procedures, and prinrouts from tests(if applicable),should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency, 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facilit Name: Date of Testing: Facility Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Noti ed of Testing: Name of Local Agena Inspector(ifpresent during testing): 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name:RI CH ENVIRONMENTAL Technician Conducting Tesr. &112 G'l> Credentials: 0CSLB Licensed Contractor 0 SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type. C611D40 License Number. 809850 Manufacturer Trainine Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires INCON INCON TS-STS -O 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made Sd ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ Id ❑ D ❑ At ❑ LA JR g�rSPECOWDARY P.P%- - x-1 ❑ o n x ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ Q I ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ Q 0 ® 0 ❑ 1 0 10 D D G ❑❑ ❑Q » ❑ D 0 C1 C) 0 It 0 D ❑ D C3 1) (3 ❑ ❑ o r ❑ a 11 ❑ Q D n 0 ❑ Q 13 0 0 0 D ❑ P2- -, o ❑ ❑ n If hydrostatic testing was performed,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: RECYCLE AND REUSED CERTIFICATION OF TECHNTCIAN RESPONSISLE.FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To Me best of my knowled , facts stated in this document are accurate and In full compliance witlt legal requirements Technician's Signature: Date: -6�ou.Q� IIIIIII VIII III IIII 34 IE as-5`�5 5W RCB,January 2002 Paoe—2,of 3- 4, TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: O Tank Manufacturer I Industry Standard 0 Professional.Engineer O Other(Spec) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 9 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic O Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: 41n. DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5% Tank ggr, Tank N Tank tt 41 Tank 01 Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' 0 Yes 19 No 0 Yes lB No 0 Yes COLNo 0 Yes G No Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: q Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading(R,): krq MA to me, Test End Time: Final Reading(R,:): lo HA Test Duration: Change in Reading(Rr-Rt): O, Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: O. 6-0 0124 kWj Test Result: )d Pass 0 Fall X Pass 0 Fail XPass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testing? 10 Yes 0 No 0 NA KYes ❑No DNA V Yes ❑No 0 NA 0 Yes D No f.;NA Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes 0 No 0 NA Il oYes O No DNA 1AYes O No DNA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA verified functional after testing? Comments—(include irformation on repairs made prior to testinkand reeommendedfollow-upfor failed tests) Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment testing. (California Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(ax6)) ' 3aS�S S WRCO,January 2002 Page of 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer 3d industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other(Spec(fy) Test Method Used: K Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic 0 Other(Spec#y) Test Equipment Used: 4 in. DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5% Piping Run Piping Run Piping Run#91 Piping Run#MIC Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: 2— 2 Length of piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation; Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading(Rt): psi A Test End Time: Final Reading(Rr): CAI Test Duration: Change in Reading(RF-R4): Pass/Fail Threshold or PIS Criteria; Teat Result: Pass 0 Fail 1K Pass 0 Fail Pau 0 Fail Pau 1 0 Fail Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testinj,and recommended follow-upfor failed tests) • aa�85 S\1'RCB,January 2002 Page of 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer R industry Standard D Professional Engineer Cl tuber(Specify) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum 81 Hydrostatic 0 Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCO TS—STS Equipment Resolution:.o o o i n. Sump Sump# Sump# Sump# bsk- Swnp Diameter: Sump Depth: Swnp Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Hig4est Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Z1 i0a Condition of sump prior to testing: el g�W Portion of Sump Tested' Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid(both drYes DNo DNA )OYes ONo DNA 10 Yes 0No DNA XdYes ONo DNA product and water)? Turbine shutdown response time Z 2-sr- Is system programmed for fail-safe )(Yes DNo ❑NA JdYes 0No DNA aYes DNo DNA AlYes ONo DNA shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be )il Yes DNo DNA UYes 0 No ❑NA la Yes DNo. DNA X Yes 0 No 0 NA operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and stating test Test Start Time: H Iq Am 111f �}�7tj AN leni.P AM Initial Reading(Rj): W Zrw v;.Izg .(„p3 t Test End Time: 11110 l i ! ICIC2 (622&d Final Reading(Rr): 9 taganj W-61ky"ba f4,c2jpj Test Duration: HI I Change in Reading(Rr-R,): , Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Q Pass 0 Fail CL Pass • 0 Fail %Pass •0 Fall B Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testing? WYes ONo DNA NYes 0No DNA $Yes 0 N ONA 2Yes 0No DNA Was sensor properly replaced and &Yes ❑No ❑NA SYes ❑No ❑NA N Yes ❑No DNA $Yes ONo DNA verified functional after testirizz Comtnen s—(include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended fo!!ow-up for(ailed tests) If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested. If the answer to gRy of the questions indicated with an asterisk(•) is"NO,,or"NA",the entire sump must be tested, (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB,January 2002 Page of 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT C TESTWG Test Method Developed By: 0 UDC Manufacturer ®Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other(Specify) Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum SI Hydrostatic ❑Other(Spec) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: -000in- UDC#( UDC#3 UDC# UDC# UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top Q of Highest Piping Penetration: f Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: An phi Ld Condition of UDC prior to testing., Portion of UDC Tested l ad- ALI Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid(both 13 Yes KNo DNA ❑Yes XNo DNA ❑Yes $No 0 N OYes )qNo DNA product and water)?' Turbine shutdown response time glA Is system programmed for fail- 0 Yes D No U NA 0 Yes 0 N CKNA 0 Yes DNo 9NA D Yes DNo )kNA safe shutdown? Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Cl 0 No )a NA 0 Yes ❑No XNA ❑Yes 0 No JdNA 0 Yes 0 No $NA nal Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Ml Test Start Time: 04 111 ALON I Initial Reading Test End Time: IRK 1 Final Reading Rp): Test Duration: Change in Reading(RF-R,): p 0=104 0,6eeLg__Aonow Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass• 0 Fail X Pass 0 Fail 18 Pass 0 Fail 9 Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testin ? X Yes ❑No ❑NA Yes 0 N 0 NA .9 Yes 0 No ❑NA V Yes 0 No 0 NA e as sensor properly replaced and yes ❑No ❑NA 'fit Yes O No 0 NA 'Yes ❑No ❑NA jiYes DNo O NA verified functional after testing? Comments--(h"elude irnjormation on r,�pairs made prior to lesung andrecommendedfollow-upforfatied tests) If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested,specify how much was tested. If the answer to MX of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*)is"NO"or"NA",the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LO-160) aa5$5 SWRCB,January 2002 Page (V 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT UDC)TESTING Test Method Developed By: 0 UDC Manufacturer. R Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other(Specify) Test Method Used: C Pressure 0 Vacuum &Hydrostatic n Other(Spec6) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: .000i.n. s UDC# UDC# UDC# UDC# UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top 9 of liinhest Pi in Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: _ Condition of UDC prior to Jesting: Portion of UDC Tested Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid(both t7 Yes X No ONA 0 Yes 0 No ❑NA 0 Yes 0 No ONA G Yes GNo 0 NA product and water Turbine shutdown response time _ Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?' 0 Yes ❑No P(NA ❑Yes DNo DNA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Dyes []No ❑NA Was fail-safe verified to be V J +— o erational?* OYes GNo XNA OYes ONo ONA ❑Yes UNo 5NA FIYes CNo CNA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and M1 starting test Test Start Time: Initial Readin g R, : Test End,rime: 21 Final Reading(Rr): "Pest Duration: Sjaqe in Readin (g RF Rt): � ua kboluj Pass/Fall Threshold or Criteria: 19 ONA tj _ Test Result: *Pass U Fail U Pass U Fail 0 Pass U Fail U Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testing? wl Yes ❑No ONA 0 Yes CNo DNA C Yes -_l No ONA t G Yes CNo ❑NA Was sensor property replaced and Yes GNo DNA 0 Yes ❑No 0 NA Dyes 0 No ❑NA , U Yes D No t_NA verified functional after testing" Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedjo(low-up for fated tests) _ If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested,specify how much was tested. If the answer to My of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*)is"NO"or"NA",the entire t.iDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) • a a5�5 S W RCB,January 2002 Page of S. FILL RISER CONTAiIIVMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipp9d With Ft11 Riser Containment Sumps 0 Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By ❑Sump Manufacturer !&Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other(Speci ) Test Method Used: ❑Pressure 0 Vacuum 1)Hydrostatic ❑Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: .0001n, Fill Sum i< Fill Sum it Fill Sum q Fill Sum # Sump Diameter. Sump Depth: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testis : Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and O� starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading Ri): Test End Time: Final Reading(R F): Test Duration: Change in Reading R R, : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: ❑ Pass ❑Fail 0 Pass []Fan 0 Pass 0 Fall D Pass 0 Fall Is there a sensor in the Sum ? 0 Yes ❑No 0 Yes D No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is 0 Yes O No. ❑NA D Yes 0 No ❑NA D Yes 0 No DNA 0 Yes 0 No DNA detected? Was sensor removed for testis ? 11 Yes 0 No O NA 0-Yes 0 No DNA 0 Yes ❑No DNA 0 Yes ONo DNA Was sensor property replacedand 0Yes ONo DNA ❑Yes ONo DNA 0Yes 0 N 0 N [0 Yes 0 N P.NA verified functional after testing? Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommendedfollow-Mforfatled tests) SWRCB,January 2002 Page of 9. SPILUOVERFILL CONTAU"RNT BOXES Facilityis Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0 Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present,but were Not Tested 0 Test Method Developed By: 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer td industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer ❑Other(S ec ) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure ❑Vacuum a hydrostatic 0 Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: .000in. .r Spill Bo: Spill Box Spill Box# I Spill Box# Bucket Diameter: bj Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying prossure/vacuum/water and startin test: Test Start Time: tMAH !(47_14M %SSM-i 14t12 A414 Initial Reading(Rt): Test End Time: 1071 M #CLOW t 'Mae Final Reading(RF); Test Duration: Change in heading(RF-R(): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result; X Pass 0 Fail D Fail $Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass 0 Fail COtn merits—(include NC rmation on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) . a�585 X-4 [/ 1_t fP TEST STARTED 1:24 PM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 1:57 Pte BEGIN LEVEL 5,3908 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/200$ END TIME 1:39 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.5865 IH END DATE 24/11/200$ END TIME 2:13 PM END LEVEL END DATE 24/11/200$ LEAK THRESHOLD 6.002 IN END LEVEL 5.5866 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED ` 1-2 TEST STARTED 1:40 PM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 2:13 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.3008 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END TIME BEGIN LEVEL 5.5866 IN END DATE 1:55 PM END TIME 2:29 PM 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 ENO LEVEL LEAK THRESHOLD 563002 IN END LEVEL 5.5865 IN TEST RESLdLT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 5-6 TEST STARTED 9-10 TEST STARTED 24/11/26gg IN LEVEL TEST STARTED 1:57 PP1 BEGIN TIME 2.8693 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END DATE 1:39 PM BEGIN LEVEL 3.3280 IN 24/11/2008 END TIME 2:13 PM END LEVEL LEAK THRESHOLD 0,.0002 IN END DATE 2 .32790IN TEST RESULT END LEVEL 3.3279 IN PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED S-6 9-10 TEST STARTED 1:40 PM TEST STARTED 2:1.3 PM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 BEGIN LEVEL 2.8692 IN BEGIN LEVEL 3.3278 IN END TIME 1:55 PM END TIME 2.29 PM END DATE 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 END LEVEL 2.8691 IN END LEVEL 3.3279 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED 91UPR _ .. DSLSTP 91STP TEST STARTED 9:55 AM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 955 AM TEST STARTED 10:45 AM BEGIN LEVEL 6.4534 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END TIME BEGIN LEVEL 5.6077 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END DATE 16:10 AM BEGIN LEVEL 4.7283 IN END LEVEL 24/11/2008 END TIME 10:10 AM END TIME 11:01 AM 6.4526 IN END DATE 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 5.6064 IN END LEVEL 4.7294 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESIN PASSED 91VPR DSLSTP TEST STARTED 10:12 AM TEST STARTED 10:12 AM 91STP TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 BEGIN LEVEL 6.4524 IN BEGIN LEVEL 5.6069 IN TEST STARTED 11:17 AM END TIME 10:28 AM END TIME 10:28 AM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 BEGIN LEVEL 4.7315 IN END LEVEL 6.4525 IN END LEVEL 5.6086 IN END TIME 11:32 AM LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END DATE 24/11/2008 TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED END LEVEL 4.7315 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED B7STP - TEST STARTED 11:17 AM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 89UPR BEGIN LEVEL 4.2391 IN 7-8 TEST STARTED 9:55 AM END TIME 11:32 AM TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END DATE 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 1:24 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.4496 IN END LEVEL 4.2389 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END TIME 10:10 AM LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN BEGIN LEVEL 2.7996 IN END DATE 24/11/2008 TEST RESULT PASSED END DATE 24/11/2008 1:39 M END LEVEL 5.4491 IN END LEVEL 2.7995 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 ED - LEAK THRESHOLD 0.802 IN ---° ••---- TEST RESULT PASSED 87STP TEST STARTED 11:01 AM 89UPR TEST SLEVEED 24 239208N 7-8 —� - END TIME 11:16 AM TEST STARTED 10:12 AM END DATE 24/11/200$ TEST STARTED 1:40 PM TEST STARTED 24/11/200$ END LEVEL 4.2390 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 BEGIN LEVEL 5.4488 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.802 IN BEGIN LEVEL 2.7996 IN END TIME 10:28 AM TEST RESULT PAD 1:55 PM END DATE 24/11/2008 END TIME END LEVEL 5.4488 IN END DATE 24/11/2008 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN ___ _ END LEVEL 2.7995 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN 89STP TEST RESULT PASSED TEST STARTED 10:45 AM - TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 87UPR BEGIN LEVEL 4.2691 IN END TIME 11:01 AM TEST STARTED 9:55 AM END DATE 24/11/2008 TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END LEVEL 4.2700 IN BEGIN LEVEL 7,3599 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END TIME 10:10 AM TEST RESULT PASSED END DATE 24/11/2008 END LEVEL 7.3597 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED -.. 89STP TEST STARTS 11:01 AM 87VPR 2 TEST STARTED 4/11/2008 TEST STARTED 10:12 AM BEGIN LEVEL 4 2X11116 00 IN TEST STARTED 24/11/2008 END TIME 24/11/2008 08 BEGIN LEVEL 7.3596 IN END DATE 4.2709 IN END TIME 10:28 AN FgD LEVEL og2 lt4 ND LEVEL 27 11/ IN TEST RESUL LD 0 �PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TcGT RESULT PASSED SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT SITE NAME• 4.iIEgs t4 DATE Lgw-Q% ADDR$SS: ( TECHNICIAN: CITY: Bar=mffem) SIGNATURE: SITE CONTACT: [TC(V�I THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED/REPAIRED TO COMPLETE THE SB989 TESTING. LIST OF PARTS REPLACED/REPAIRED: REPAIRS: LABOR: PARTS INSTALLED: