The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008 SB989 RESULTS IIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIII 55 SWRCB,January 2002 IE Pagel of 5 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containments systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printout from tests(f applicable),should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1.FACILITY INFORMATION Facility:AT&T Corporation Service Date: 08/19/2008 Facility Address: 1520 20th St. Bakersfield CA 93301 GEO PAR#CAKO10 Facility Contact: Grant Armstrong Facility Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 05/19/2008 Test T e: 36 Month Name of Local Agency Inspector if present during testing):None 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name:Tait Environmental Services Technician Providing Test: AGUILAR ADOLFO Credentials ®CSLB Licensed Contractor ❑SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester ®ICC UST Service Technician License Type: A B ASB C-10 HAZ License Number: 588098 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires Icc Technician 5238610-UT 02/24/2009 Incon TS-STS Test Unit 2957353761 01/13/2010 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made Annular#CAK010U001 ® ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Fill Sump#CAKOI OU001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Piping Sump#CAKOIOU00I M ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Return Secondary Line#CAKOI OU001 El ❑ ❑ ❑ Supply Secondary Line#CAKOI OU001 FE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 10 -0- :Rdl I Fj F I F-1 I LL-1 If hydrostatic testing was performed,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Left Non-Haz Test Water @ Site Properly Labeled And Secured. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge,the facts stated i s doc ment are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature Date 08/19/2008 111111 11111 lil 1111 56 IE SWRCB,January 2002 Page 2 of 5 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Tank Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ® Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used:4"Dial Guage Equipment Resolution: .2 Tank# Tank# Tank# Tank# #CAKO10U001 Is Tank Exempt From Testing?(1) ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Tank Capacity: 8,002 Gallons Tank Material: Steel Clad Tank Manufacturer: Joor Product Stored: Diesel Wait Time between applying One Hour pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 10:20 AM Initial Reading(Ri): -10 HG Test End Time. 11:20 AM Final Reading(RO: -10 HG Test Duration: One Hour Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 Test Result ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was Sensor Removed for Testing? ® Ya ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was Sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified after testing? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Re-Installed Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. (1)Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment,such as sysrtems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(a)(6)) SWRCB,January 2002 Page 3 of 5 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Piping Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ® Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used:4"Dial Gauge Equipment Resolution: .l Piping Run#Supply Piping Run#Return Piping Run# Piping Run# #CAK01OU001 #CAK01OU001 Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: Amoron Amoron Piping Diameter: 3" 3" Length of Piping Run: Approx. 170' Approx. 170' Product Stored: Diesel Diesel Method and location of piping-run Test Boot @ Turbine Test Boot @ Turbine isolation: Sump Sum Wait Time between applying N/A 15 Minutes pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: N/A 9:30 AM Initial Reading(Ri): N/A 5 PSI Test End Time: N/A 10:30 AM Final Reading(Rf): N/A 5 PSI Test Duration: N/A One Hour Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): N/A 0 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 PSI Test Result ❑ Pa ® Fail ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Comments include any information on repairs ma a rior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Visual Fail On Supply Sec.Line,Needs A Coupling Clamshell On Secondary LIne In Order To Sustain Pressure. SWRCB,January 2002 Page 4 of 5 6.PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Test Unit Equipment Resolution: .0006 Sump#Piping Sump# Sump# Sump# #CAKO10U001 Sump Diameter 44" Sump Depth 35" Sump Material Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of 14" Highest PiDing Penetration Height from Tank Top to Lowest 15" Electrical Penetration Condition of sump prior to testing OK Portion of Sump Tested(1) 2"above piping penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid(both ❑ Yes ❑ No U NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time N/A Is sytem programmed for fail-safe ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 15 Minutes test Test Start Time 11:27 AM 11:46 AM Initial Reading Ri) 6.1859" 6.1860" Test End Time 11:42 AM 12:01 PM Final Reading 6.1860" 6.1859" Test Duration 15 15 Change in Reading Rf-Ri +.0001" -.0001" Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria .002" Test Result ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was sensor removed for testing? N Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Cl Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No DNA 110Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testing? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-tip for failed tests Re-Installed Sensor To Lowet Point But Not Tested. (1)If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested.If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*)is"NO"or"NA",the entire sump must be tested.(See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB,January 2002 Page 5 of 5 8.FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Test Unit Equipment Resolution: .0006 Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# #CAK01 OU001 Sump Diameter: 44" Sump Depth: 32" Height from Tank Top to Top of N/A Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 21" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: OK Portion of Sump Tested: 2"Above Collar Sump Material: Fiberglass Wait time between applying 15 Minutes pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 11:27 AM 11:46 AM Initial Reading Ri): 2.6116" 2,6115" Test End Time: 11:42 AM 12.01 PM Final Reading 2.6114" 2.6114" Test Duration: 15 15 Change in Reading Rf-Ri : -.0002" -.0001" Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002" Test Result: ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testin ? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Re-Installed Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. s ATT ATT 1520 20TH ST. ATT i ' BAKERSFIELD 1520,20TH ST. BAKERSFIELD 1520 20TH S CA BAKERSFIELU - 6A rA 08/19/2008. 11:42 AM 08/19/2068 11:05 AM ' 08/19/2008 12:01 PM St1MP'LEAK"TEST REPORT SUMP LEVEL REPORT SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT PIPING i i TEST STARTED. 11 .27,AM PIPING SUMP PIPING 6.186 IN 8/19/266$ TEST STARTED 11:46 AM SUMP FILL 2.611 IN TEST STARTED 6 BEGIN LEVEL 6.1859 IN•, TEST STARTED 08/19/2668 END.TIME 11:42 AM :I BEGIN LEVEL 6.1866 IN END' DATE 98/19/2668 END TIME 12:61 PM END LEVEL 6.1866 IN END DATE 68/19/2668 LEAK THRESHOLD 6.662 IN END LEVEL 6.1859 IN TEST RESULT PASSED I LEAK THRESHOLD 0.692 IN TEST RESULT PASSED FILL ATT TEST STARTED_ 11:27 AM FILL 152P 20TH ST. TEST STARTED 08/19/2008" ! TEST STARTED 11:46 AM BAKERSFIELD - -I BEGIN LEVEL . 2.6116 IN TEST STARTED 08/19/2008 GA END-TIME '�= 11:42 AM BEGIN LEVEL 2.6115 IN END DATE" 98/19/2068 ;. END TIME 12:01 PM 08/19/290$ 11:26 AM END LEVEL 2,:611'4 IN END DATE 08/19/2008 LEAK THRESHOLD• -.0.002 IN END LEVEL 2.6114 IN SUMP LEVEL REPORT TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED i SUMP PIPING 6.186 IN Y SUMP FILL. 2.612 IN TEST DATE: 08/19/2008 CLIENT: AT&T, GEOPAR: CAK010 PAGE 1 OF 1 Tait Environmental Services a O� UST Construction • Design • Maintenance • Compliance 7f September 2_2008 V/A FED EX 8664 6551 1152 / ✓ f\�� Bakersfield Fire Department 1600 Truxton Avenue, Suite 401 Bakersfield, CA 9330.1 Re: Secondary Containment Testing Report Form AT&T Corporation 1520 20th Street, Bakersfield, CA GEOPAR: CAK010 To Whom it May Concern: Enclosed are the test results for the location listed above completed on August 19th, 2008: ■ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Very Tr ly Yours, i M tthew L. Denison Program Manager MD T:\ATT Document Management\Legacy T Sites\CAK010\Cover Letters\CAK010_SB989 Cover Letter Bakersfield FD 09022008.doc CA Lic #588098 • AZ Lic #095984 • NV Llc #0049666 2131 S. Dupont Drive • Anaheim, California 92806 • 714.560.8222 • 714.685.0006 Fax 11280 Trade Center Drive • Rancho Cordova, California 95742 • 916.858.1090 • 916.858.1011 Fax www.tait.com