The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 2008 IIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIII 59 IE ° SWRCB,January 2002 Page 1 of 6� S Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containments systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printout from tests(if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility: Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California. Service Date: 10/01/2008 Facility Address: 1918 "M" STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 GEO PAR#SA004 Facility Contact: Grant Armstrong Facility Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 08/29/2008 Test Type: 6 Month Name of Local Agency Inspector if present during testing): Erne Medina Bakersfield F.D. 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Tait Environmental Services Technician Providing Test : Mclane Paul Credentials ®CSLB Licensed Contractor ❑SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester ®ICC UST Service Technician License Type: A B ASB C-10 HAZ I License Number: 588098 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires INCON 38437237614 08/02/2009 ICC 5238651-UT 03/13/2009 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made Annular#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I El Supply Secondary#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Return Secondary#SA0040001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Piping Sump#SA0040001 ® ❑ 1❑ Ej I ❑ ❑ ❑ Fill Sump#SA0040001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Transition Sump#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Ll ❑ ❑ I❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ I❑ El I ❑ ❑ ❑ Fj El El ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 L1_LLLL__EL__ 10 a_LLL_#�Ji If hydrostatic testing was performed,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Left 4- 55 gallon drum of test water on-site. Labeled and sealed. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge,the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature Date 10/01/2008 i�II I II(IIII I�I IIII 60 IE SWRCB,January 2002 Page 2 of 6 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Tank Manufacturer N Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used N Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Dial Guage 4" Equipment Resolution: .2 Tank##SA004U001 Tank# Tank# Tank# Is Tank Exempt From Testing?(1) ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Tank Capacity: 20,000 gallon Tank Material: Steel Clad Tank Manufacturer: Modern Welding Product Stored: Diesel Wait Time between applying 1 Hour pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 10:15am Initial Reading(Ri): -10 HG Test End Time. 11:15am Final Reading(Rf): -10 HG Test Duration: I Hour Change in Reading(Rf- Ri): 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 Test Result N Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was Sensor Removed for Testing. N Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA 110 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 11E] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was Sensor properly replaced and ❑ Ycs N No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified after testing? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Sensor was re-installed at lowest point but not tested. (1)Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment,such as sysrtems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(a)(6)) SWRCB,January 2002 Page 3 of 6 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Piping Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ® Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" Dial Gauge Equipment Resolution: .I Piping Run#Sply Piping Run#Rtrn Piping Run# Piping Run# #SA004U001 #SA004U001 Piping Material: Composite Composite Piping Manufacturer: Western FG Wester FG Piping Diameter: 1.5" 1.5" Length of Piping Run: 50' 50' Product Stored: Diesel Diesel Method and location of piping-run Test Boot Test Boot isolation: Wait Time between applying 15 Min. 15 Min. pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 9:20am 9:20am Initial Reading(Ri): 5 PSI 5 PSI Test End Time: 10:20am 10:20am Final Reading(RO: 5 PSI 5 PSI Test Duration: 1 Hour 1 Hour Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): 0 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 Test Result ® Pass ❑ Fail J11 ® Pass ❑!!!!_jjj ❑ Pass ❑ Fail J1 ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests SWRCB,January 2002 Page 4 of 6 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: INC TS-STS Test Unit Equipment Resolution: .0006 Sump# Piping Sump#Trans Sump# Sump# #SA0040001 #SA0040001 Sump Diameter 48" 18"x 24" Sump Depth 42" 22" Sump Material Fiberglass Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of 14" 8" Highest Piping Penetration Height from Tank Top to Lowest 24" 20" Electrical Penetration Condition of sump prior to testing Good Good Portion of Sump Tested(1) 2"above highest piping 2"above highest piping penetration penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid(both ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time NA NA Is sytem programmed for fail-safe ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 30 Min. 30 Min. test Test Start Time 11:12am 11:27am 12:13 pm 12:29 pm Initial Reading Ri) 5.0312 5.0318 2.0374 2.0381 Test End Time 11:27am 11:42am 12:29 pm 12:44 pm Final Reading R 5.0319 5.0317 2.0381 2.0380 Test Duration 15 Min, 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. Change in Reading Rf-Ri .0007 .0001 .0007 .0001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria .002 .002 Test Result ® Pass ❑ Fail ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testing?_ Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Sensor re-installed to lowest point but not tested. (1) If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*)is"NO"or"NA",the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB,January 2002 Page 5 of 6 8.FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon Equipment Resolution: .0006 Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# SA004U001 Sump Diameter: 48" Sump Depth: 54" Height from Tank Top to Top of 25" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 35" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Good Portion of Sump Tested: 2"Above Piping Sump Material. Fiberglass Wait time between applying 30 Min. pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 12:13 12:29 Initial Reading Ri): 3.4432 3.4448 Test End Time: 12:29 12:44 Final Reading(R f): 3.4445 3.4462 Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. Change in Reading Rf-Ri : .0013 .0014 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002 Test Result: ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testing? I I Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests The sensor was reinstalled to the lowest point but not tested. SWRCB,January 2006 SPILL BUCKET TESTING REPORT FORM This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printout from tests(if applicable),should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California Date of Testing: 10/01/2008 Facility Address: 1918 "M" STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 GEO PAR#SA004 Facility Contact: Grant Armstorong Facilit Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 08/29/2008 Name of Local Agency Inspector if present during testing): Ernie Medina Bakersfield F.D. 2.TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Technician Conducting Test: McLane Paul Credentials: ® CSLB Contractor ® ICC Service Tech ❑ SWRCB Tank ❑ Other(Specify) Incon 38437237614 Tester License Number (s): A ASB HAZB C-10; 588098: 5238651-UT 3.SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used ® Hydrostatic ❑ Vacuum ❑ Other Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Test Unit I Equipment Resolution: .0006 Identify Spill Bucket(By Tank Number, I #SA004UOO1 2 3 4 Stored Product, etc) El Direct Bury El Direct Bury El Direct Bury ❑ Direct Bury Bucket Installation Type ® Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump Bucket Diameter inches 12" Bucket Depth inches 30" Wait Time between applying 30 Min. vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time: 11:12am / 11:27am Initial Reading Ri): 5.8210 / 5.7984 Test End Time: 11:27am / 11:42am Final Reading 5.7985 / 5.7869 Test Duration: 15 Min. / 15 Min. Change in Reading Rf-Ri : .0225 / .0115 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002 Test Result Fail Comments: Test water left on site in one of the 55 gallon drums along with the SB989 test water CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING i hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true,accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature �� Date 10/01/2008 i HT7 ' 1918 N ST. 8HKERSFIEU) HTT CH. 191O IM ST' 9HKER9FTEL0 10/01/2008 11:+3 Am CH. M7T � Si/MP LEAK, TEST REPORT z8/01/2008 12:13 PM SAKERSFIELD plPSUMP SUMP LEVEL REPOR.''' TEST STARTED z1:27 H�! | TEST 10/01/2008 SUMP TR�N3MP 2.037 I� ' | BEGI� �EoEL� 5.031G 1 SUMP FILSUMP 3.443 �N SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT END TIME 11:42 �w END DATE i0/01,0008 | 17_HD L[oEL 5.0317 iN / LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 lX TEST STARTED il-12 AM TEST RESULT PASSED TEST STARTED 10101z2008 LEVEL 5.0Z12 IN 'END TIME 11.27 AM, i | SPILSKT \ ' END D�.TE 10/01/200S END LEUEL 5'.0319 IN ! TEST STARTED 11:27 AM I_Ef�K THRESHOLD 0.002 lN TEST STARTED 10/01/2008 | ATT E ST RESULT PASSED BEGIN LEVEL 5.7984 IN . 1918 M ST, END TlME 11:42 HM @HKERSFI[LD END D*TE !0/01/2008 Cpl.: END LEVEL 5.7869 IN L[HK THRESHOLD 8.002 IN 10/0, /2008 12:29 PM TEST �'TARTED li*12 AM TEST RESULT FHlLED TEST STARTED 10/01/2008 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT :�ECJIH LEVEL 5.8210 IN END TIME ilw27 AM TRHNSMP END DATE 1001/20ROO Ef-ifl) LEVEL 5.7985 IN { TEST STARTED 12:13 P� Lz'.'AK THRESHOLD 0.002 lN TEST STARTED l&/81/2888 TEST RESULT FAILED BEGIN LEVEL 2.037q IN -ND TlM[ 12:29 PM ` END DATE 10/01/2008 | 'ND LEVEL 2.0381 IN | !_EHK THRESHOLD 0.002 � TEST RESULT P,�SSED | ATT ! | 1918 N ST. / | 8AKERSPl[LD FlLSAP TEST ST6RTED 12:z3 PM 10/81/2808 12:07 PM TEST STO.RTEk 16/01/2008 �EGIN LEVEL 3.+432 lN ALHRT! REPORT END TIME 12;29 PM �@D DATE l0/§1/2008 10/01/2808 12:87 PM [ND LEVEL 3.4445 Ilk LEHK THRESHOLD 8 �02 -N POWER Up ) , ^ . TEST RESULT P��SE0 10/01/2008 n:43 HM POWER DOWN \ TEST DATE: 10/1/2008 -CLIENT: AT&T, GEOPAR: SA004 PAGE OF i / '7 WT 2918 )" W. 10/01/2�2 2'4 4 m SUVIF LEhK TE.-.'.7 REPOR7 76NSOP TEST STARTED 12'29 PFi TE�.STARTED 10/01/2008 BEGD LEVEL 2.038'1 1H TND TIME :.2t44 Pri END DATE 10/01/200F., UID UEIJEL 2.0380 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 621§ TEST RESULT PASSED FILSUMP EST STm TED 12"29 PN TEST SYRTED 10/01/200C 8EGIN LEOEL 3.4081H EN D TIME late QM END LEOEL 3.4462 lN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN T REsum PASSED TEST DATE: 101/2008 -CLIENT: AT&T, GEOPAR: SA004 PAGE OF =� Tait Environmental Services UST Construction • Design • Maintenance Compliance October 8, 2008 VIA FED EX: 8664 6551 1461 Bakersfield Fire Department 1501 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield CA 93301 Re: Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California 1918 "M" STREET, BAKERSFIELD CA GEOPAR: SA004 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed are the results for the following tests completed on October 1 st, 2008: ■ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, Matthew L. Denison Program Manager MD T:ICLIENTSIAT&T1ATT Document ManagementlAT RSA0041Cover Letters1 20081008_SA004_SBC2008-01_SB989 Cover Letter Bakersfield.doc CA Lic #588098 • AZ Lic #095984 • NV Lic #0049666 2131 South Dupont Drive • Anaheim, California 92806 • 714.560.8222 • 714.978.2615 Fax 11280 Trade Center Drive • Rancho Cordova, California 95742 • 916.858.1090 • 916.858.1011 Fax www.talt.com O� SWRCB,January 2002 Page 1 of 6 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containments systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures,and printout from tests(if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1.FACILITY INFORMATION Facility:Pacific Bell Telephone Co.dba AT&T California Service Date: 10/01/2008 m Facility Address: 1918 "M"STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 GEO PAR#SA004 2Z Facility Contact: Grant Armstrong Facility Phone: �J Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:08/29/2008 Test T : 6 Month Name of Local Agency Inspector if present during testing):Erne Medina Bakersfield F.D. JS 2.TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION R Company Name:Tait Environmental Services Technician Providing Test:Mclane Paul Credentials ®CSLB Licensed Contractor ❑SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester ®ICC UST Service Technician License Type:A B ASB C-10 HAZ ILicense Number: 588098 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires INCON 38437237614 08/02/2009 ICC 5238651-UT 03/13/2009 3.SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made Annular#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ Supply Secondary#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Return Secondary#SA004U001 ® ❑ 11❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El Piping Sump#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ Fill Sump#SA004U001 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Transition Sump#SA004UO01 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Ej Spill Bucket#SAO04U001 ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ID ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ El El E] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ If hydrostatic testing was perfonned,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Left 4-55 gallon drum of test water on-site. Labeled and sealed. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge,the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature �� Date 10/01/2008 SWRCB,January 2002 Page 2 of 6 4.TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Tank Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used E Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used:Dial Guage 4" Equipment Resolution: .2 Tank##SA004U001 Tank# Tank# Tank# Is Tank Exempt From Testing?(1) ❑ Yes E No ❑ Yes E No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Tank Capacity: 20,000 gallon Tank Material: Steel Clad Tank Manufacturer: Modern Welding Product Stored: Diesel Wait Time between applying 1 Hour pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 10:15am Initial Reading(Ri): -10 HG Test End Time: 11:15am Final Reading(RO: -10 HG Test Duration: 1 Hour Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 Test Result E Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was Sensor Removed for Testing? E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was Sensor properly replaced and ❑ Ycs E No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No C) NA 13 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified after testing? i Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended f011OW-UP for failed tests Sensor was re-installed at lowest point but not tested. (t)Secondary containment systems where the`aontinuous monitoring automatically monitors both the Primary and secondary containment,such as sysrtems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment testing. iCalifomia Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(a)(6)1 ............................... ._......_............... ................................................_..................:..._.._._.._................................................... ........... ................. .. ..........................................._........: SWRCB,January 2002 Page 3 of 6 5.SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Piping Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ® Pressure ❑ vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used:4"Dial Gauge Equipment Resolution: ,1 Piping Run#Sply Piping Run#Rtrn Piping Run# Piping Run# #SA004U001 #SA004U001 Piping Material: Composite Composite Piping Manufacturer: Western FG Wester FG Piping Diameter: 1.5" 1.5" Length of Piping Run: 50' 50' Product Stored: Diesel Diesel Method and location of piping-run Test Boot Test Boot isolation: Wait Time between applying 15 Min. 15 Min. pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 9:20am 9:20am Initial Reading(Ri): 5 PSI 5 PSI Test End Time: 10:20am 10:20am Final Reading(Rf): 5 PSI 5 PSI Test Duration: 1 Hour 1 Hour Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): 0 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 Test Result IL® Pass ❑ Fail ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests SWRCB,January 2002 Page 4 of 6 6.PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: INC TS-STS Test Unit Equipment Resolution:.0006 Sump#Piping Sump#Trans Sump# Sump# #SA004U001 #SA004U001 Sump Diameter 48" 18"x 24" Sump Depth 42" 22" Sump Material Fiberglass Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of 14" 8" Highest Pioing Penetration Height from Tank Top to Lowest 24" 20" Electrical Penetration Condition of surnp prior to testing Good Good Portion of Sump Tested(1) 2"above highest piping 2"above highest piping oration penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid(both ❑ Yes ❑ No S NA ❑ Yes [] No S NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time NA NA Is sytem programmed for fail-safe ❑ Yes ❑ No S NA ❑ Yes ❑ No S NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be ❑ Yes ❑ No S NA ❑ Yes ❑ No S NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 30 Min. 30 Min. test Test Start Time 11:12am 11:27am 12:13 pm 12:29 pm Initial Reading Ri) 5.0312 5.0318 2.0374 2.0381 Test End Time 11:27am 11:42am 12:29 pm 12:44 pm Final Reading R 5.0319 5.0317 2.0381 2.0380 Test Duration 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. Change in Reading Rf-Ri .0007 .0001 .0007 .0001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria .002 .002 Test Result S Pass ❑ Fail S Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fall Was sensor removed for testing? S Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑-NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Yes S No ❑ NA I❑ Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testing? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests Sensor re-installed to lowest point but not tested. (1)If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested.If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*)is"NO"or"NA",the entire sump must be tested.(See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB,January 2002 Page 5 of6 8.FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon Equipment Resolution: .0006 Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# SA004U001 Sump Diameter: 48" Sump Depth: 54" Height from Tank Top to Top of 25" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 35" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Good Portion of Sump Tested: 2"Above Piping Sw-np Material: Fiber-glass Wait time between applying 30 Min. pressure/vacuum/waler and starting test: Test Start Time: 12:13 12:29 Initial Readin F4(Ri : 3.4432 3.4448 Test End Time: 12:29 12:44 Final Reading(R f): 3.4445 3.4462 Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. Change in Reading Rf-Ri : 0013 .0014 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002 Test Result: ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Cl Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ Ycs ® No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑.NA verified functional after testin ? Comments include any information on repairs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests The sensor was reinstalled to the lowest point but not tested. SWRCB,January 2006 SPILL BUCICET TESTING REPORT FORM This form is intended for use by contractors pe►formhrg annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printout from tests(if applicable),should be provided to the facilio,otivner/operalorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1.FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name:Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California Date of Testing: 10/01/2008 Facility Address: 1918"M" STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 GEO PAR#SA004 Facility Contact:Grant Armstorong Facility Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 08/29/2008 Name of Local Agency Inspector if present during testing):Ernie Medina Bakersfield F.D. 2.TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name:TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Technician Conductin Test:McLane Paul Credentials: ® CSLB Contractor ® ICC Service Tech ❑ SWRCB Tank ❑ Other(Specify) Incon 38437237614 Tester License Number(s):A ASB HAZB C-10. 588098:5238651-UT 3.SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used ® Hydrostatic ❑ Vacuum ❑ Other Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Test Unit E ui ment Resolution: .0006 ldenO Spill Bucket(By Tank Number, I #SA004UOO1 2 3 4 Stored Product,etc) El Direct Bury ❑ Direct Bury ❑ Direct Bury ❑ Direct Bury Bucket Installation Type ® Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump ❑ Contained in Sump Bucket Diameter inches 12" Bucket Depth inches 30" Wait Time between applying 30 Min. vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time: 11:12am / 11:27am Initial Reading Ri): 5.8210 / 5.7984 Test End Time: 11:27am / 11:42am Final Reading(R f): 5.7985 / 5.7869 Test Duration: 15 Min. / 15 Min. Chan a in Readin Rf-Ri : 0225 / .0115 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 Test Result Fail Comments:Test water left on site in one of the 55 gallon drums along with the SB989 test water CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true,accurate and In full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature / � � � Date 10101/2008 _............_.............................._....._........... ........... _ .� ... T•5�J ie r.. Wr.__RSP r_'U,, yozoi/2008 lIZ43 011 Co. 1913 1 37, 7Af'ERS�pELi) aT % I,a;;, RUi*fir _EVQ iRrP" 0 TV87 STAWD 11;27 AF 411 1.0/01 x`'2058 :027 a;l 757 STARTED 0/01/2008 SUMP TRANSW 2.037 10 E=GEN LEUE'_ 51031S ly S_MD FI_SUMP 3.443 W: SUMO LEAK TES7 REPOR° END TIME 11:12 AN ENE? DPTE 0/91/2008 1psu'IP SO WEL 5.0317 IW. LEAK THRESHOL) 0.0652 10; -f%7 STARTED 11312 ArP TEST ?ES!LT TASSED TEST STARTED 30/002008 SE01; LEVEL 5.0312 Ih ND TIME 1%27 AM `B- END DATE 10/01/2 c. - END LW EL 5.0319 W ?,E ST WARTS) !W27 All LEAK THRESHOLO 0.002 0 TES- STARTED 0/012006 07 TEST IESULT PASSED }SE IN :. .?tt:34 IN 1918 i' �� • END it LEVEL AAKERSTAILD END 047E it/01/2008 St=:'_8K_• END LEVEL 5.7845 T+` .OAK THRESHOLD 0.092 IN ;I?/G;'t! jL:� ,2 ?9 Wo TEST 17 l iA ::2AM TES- R_S : cM'..~D TEST STARTED SUMP YAK T ' 1EW _FUEL 5.82!0 IN END -IM.E 11,27 AM', 7RANSW ?ND BATE 10:01/20W END -..`.t3EL 5,7985 YN •'I_S WARTED 010`. t AK THRESHOLD 0.002 IPA "T ST STARTED 10/01/2008 TEST RESUE.- FAILED BEGIN :_EUQ 2.037' W ZND TIME 12!29 M END DATE 10/'21_%2 0Oc 14D LEVEL 2.03Gt ZN LEAK THRESKOLD 0.002 Q� TEST TES LLT PASSED AT- 1910 x AWS J,':-I_:) 7ST STARTED 0113 PM i0f!j°/281P 1_;A ?_{,+ 'BEST STP.9,7ED WIN LEUEL 3.402 714 ALARi' RE" END T ME 12;25 Q ='fito DATE :001/2008 W END L�EL :445 1�1 1�a;4�:./2t�6$ :2z:97 � - -- ,. POWER U _EAK 'WESHOLD V 3.102 02 W. 7,SkEb ^n74•:h _H TEST DATE: 10/1/2008 CLIENT: AT&T, GEOPAR: SA004 PAGE I OF 2- 4�1• e r I ECG AR l"D 29 :l iq;/01/2003 EE I r,' L=UEL 2,13381.1'. h END si":T� tl��i1;I06 2.3380 ?`i LEAK THRESHOLD '�.002 T'-_..- R L1 L- pRSS;7:) F ,._r. CNN) r i fliE -2.0 Ur: If) LEVE1 w.`x+62 'JaV ?'HHRM4GL; 0.1 3�2 ?;: _p TEST DATE: 10/1/2008 CLIENT: AT&T, GEOPAR: SA004 PAGE OF Tait Environmental Services UST Construction • Design • Maintenance • Compliance October 17, 2008 VIA FED EX: 8664 6539 0353 Bakersfield Fire Department 1501 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield CA 93301 Re: Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California 1918 "M" STREET, BAKERSFIELD CA GEOPAR: SA004 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed are the results for the following tests completed on October 1 st, 2008: ■ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This test was previously sent and has since been revised. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, Matthew L. Denison Program Manager MD T:ICLIENTSIAT&71ATT Document Management\ATT1SA0041Cover Letters1 20081008_SA004_SBC2008-01_SB989 Cover Letter_Bakersfield.doc CA Lic #588098 - AZ Lic #095984 • NV Lic #0049666 2131 South Dupont Drive • Anaheim, California 92806 • 714.560.8222 • 714.978.2615 Fax 11280 Trade Center Drive • Rancho Cordova, California 95742 • 916.858.1090 • 916.858.1011 Fax www.tait.com