HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 RESULTS 2009 .. � JIM 33
S W RCB,January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form)s intended for use by contractors perform ing periodic testing of UST secondary containment syokims. Use tha
appropriate pages of this form to report resv/ts for all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and
prinrouls from tests(rf applicable),should be provided to the facility ownerloperator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: TA Date of Testing:
Facility Address: Co ,J 4
Facility Contact: E J Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency inspector(ifpresent during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name:RICH ENVIRONMENTAL
Technician Conducting Test:
Credentials: 0 CSLB Licensed Contractor 0 SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type. C611D40 License Number: 809850
Manufac(�r Training
Manufacturer om onen s Date Training Expires
INCON INCON TS—STS 1 12—o�3r
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fall Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs
Tested Made Tested Made
17 A;r y ura vt- o ❑ v erq- ❑ ❑ a
Xi A 1J r,1uLA+2 U 0 Q 7 TP ❑ ❑ LI
►� �� Q ❑ Q 34 6TP
11 0 .SST ❑ ❑ ❑
C r+ r v o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
3"+ 5C�a d-bkfuj o o ❑ 1 Ux 1--�)_ J4- ❑ 1 ❑ ❑
EC-0 t, ❑ ❑ ❑ U-Z4- a.`-1 !f- o ❑ ❑
t—g>E L- C W, -,)K&L� j& ❑ ❑ ❑ D C,:- -(.o 0 ❑ r
87 o o ❑ a o D
i r�1 c W nit�f�li ❑ 13 ❑ $rI _ _L- Jr�P 13 ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ 0 4 r=u- So mP ❑ C G
I V tta. QE.�U2 .SE ,�ZyQ ❑ ❑ ❑ g1 F� 1.� ❑ a Q
If hydrostatic testing was performed,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
RECYCLE AND REU�D
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge,the facts.stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature:_/—'�— Date: ��—(�
I I�IIII�M I III 34
I
SWRCB,January 1,002 Page?.-of �b
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment.systems. Use the
appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written rest procedures, and
printouts from tests(if applicable),should be provided to the facility owner/operalor for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: NEL` � -,ZV Date of Testing: �p
Facility Address: (o t— A j A
Facilitv Contact: �Phne:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Namc of Local Agency Inspector(ifpresent during testing): W iE
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name:RICH ENVIRONMENTAL _
Technician Conducting Test: _
Credentials: 3CSLB Licensed Contractor 0 SWKCB Licensed Tank'Cester
License Type C611D90 LicenssNurnber: 609850
Manufacturer Iraining
Manufacturer Corn nent s Date Trainin Expires
INCON INCON TS—STS
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs
Tested Made Tested i Made
❑ a ❑ n ❑ n
�. V P2
---- El ❑ O _ U
L C J J❑
El D
❑ ❑ ❑ n a n P-
P ❑ ❑ o c� c
CJ 0 ❑ ❑ D 11 0 ❑
1.1 ❑ ❑ ❑ U 1 11 ;j } ❑
If hydrostatic testing was performed,describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
RECYCLE ANC REUSED
D
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge,the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: ___ Date:
>
SWRCB,January 2002 Page of v_
4, TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: ❑Tank Manufacturer ja Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other(Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 9 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
0 Otfter(Spec)
Test Equipment Used: 4 i n. DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: . 5%
J� o. Tank# 7 A,4 j Tank#14 jj .. Tank#9 Tank#
fs Tank Exempt From Testing?' es ❑No es 0 No es —O No es C No
Tank Capacity:
Tank Material:
Tank Manufacturer:
Product Stored:
Wait time between applying
pressurOvacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading(Rj):
Test End Time:
Final Reading(RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading(RF-Rr):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail ❑ Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes ❑No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No f'NA
Was sensor properly replaced and 0 Yes D No 0 NA OYes 0 N 0 N OYes 0No DNA OYes ❑No ONA
verified functional after testis 7
COM tnentS—(include it formation on repairs made prior io testing;and recommended follow-u for jailed tests)
Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(a)(6)}
SWRCB,January 2002 Page y of
S. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer :0 Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other(Spec)
Test Method Used: 9 Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
0 Other(Specify)
Test Equipment Used: 41 n. DIAL GAUGE Equipment ResoIut'ion: .5%
Piping Run# Piping Run 4 'cir Piping Run#9/ Piping Run 9iF,5�
Piping Material:
Piping Manufacturer: t; �!it Q"j rJ L i IL-.U W '4 t)n1
Piping Diameter. d rrI S, ,I
Length of Piping Run: FT p FT `FU t=T �r
Product Stored: &fi-sour. N G t.s'I-J ' E - �-
Method and location of
piping-run isolation: &cT =-I sum(' Z m i Y,� 50 r1\0 POOT rt m
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test: 3L, {l�T^) aU (rl IJ m— rf
Test Start Time: GO N(Yl :Ci0 A»'t UGC] A P►'1 M
Initial Reading(Ri):
Test End Time: CIO H =C,o Am l AM IO' R
Final Reading(RF): H67 _j 1't GI
Test Duration: ) 1i(/- �$H f— l h t2 12
Change in Reading(RF-R,): C oti�
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: C) (,n I l G NC.
Test Result: ,9-Pass 0 Fall ass 0 Fall ass 0 Fail ss 0 Fail
Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up jorfailed tests)
S W RCB,January 2002 Page S of J��
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer k Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
C Other(Specify)
'nest Method Used: k pressure 0 Vacuum ❑Hydrostatic
0 Other(Specify)
Test Equipment Used: 4 in. DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5% —
.; Piping Run#t7 aT Piping Run# �T Piping Run#91 EA; Piping Run#91
Piping Material: F �Z$ � T O—A
Piping Manufacturer: U t "C) %C.A°J^j
Piping Diameter: _� 2~rJ DTF-3 'aT 2 4 -
Length of Piping Run: T 75 T- 90 ICT za- Fr
Product Stored C-�N�t_��►E �CTr1 E 11 I'd L= t T 4
Method and location of
ipit�-run isolation_ _ — _, _�r1 ��P = 4 cStJpP T=� SU rn1 St/r�P
Wait time between applying T
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test: C-n- O ff�Tr-j AJ rn�,-j
Test Start Time: //. p f}rrl / Ark Art1
Initial Reading(Rt);� _
Tes j O Pi►'1 _
Final Reading(RF): (.1 Ids
Test Duration �.— i Nit—
Change in Reading(Rr-Rt): O NC 0"6,7 O tL6 C>
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: U
Test Result: Pass 0 Fail ass 0 Fail y-Pass 0 Fail *—Pass 0 Fail
Comments—(include information on repuirs made prior to testing, and recommended/o(low�for jailed less}
SWRCB,January 2002 Page U_of
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: ❑Piping Manufacturer k Industry Standard U Professional Engineer
G Other(Spec)
Test Method Used: k Pressure ❑Vacuum ❑Hydrostatic
C Other(Specify)
Test Equipment Used: 4 i n. DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution:.5%
Piping Run# Piping Run# Piping Run# Piping Run#
Piping Material:
Piping Manufacturer:
Piping Diameter: y ry _
Length of Piping Run:
Product Stored: }7i L
Method and location of
piipirt,run isolation: 7 -r.� .!5,
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and l
starting test: /`►
Test Start Time: AVO
Initial Reading(RO:
Test End
Final Reading(RF): —
'rest Duration: _ _— _t_
Change in Reading(RF-R,):
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0 _
Test Result: ass ❑Fail: ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail D Pass ❑Fail
Comments—(include iryforma/ion on repairs evade prior to testing, and recwnmendS!LfiolloK:j�for jailed teas) ___�
SWRCB,January 2002 Page?of
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer &Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
❑Other(Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure D Vacuum 91 Hydrostatic
0 Other(Specify)
Test Equipment Used: INCON T,5-STS Equipment Resolution:,000in.
Sump# 7 Sump# 4 Sutnp# 91 Sump# 1 �
Sump Diameter: Ig _
Sump Depth: 3'-5-,
Swnp Material: FZ CV2-U F LP,SS gK-C-> � (Z n
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest n
Electrical Penetration: x U Z 4 ��_Condition of sump prior to testing: Gl.cf� C_�rj A,
Portion of Sump Tested` ILA V-1
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid(both -Yes 0 N DNA Yes 0 N DNA )4.Yes 0No DNA Yes ❑No DNA
roduct and water?'
Turbine shutdown response time C-7 c a C_
IS system programmed for fail-safe es ❑No Cl NA es ❑No ❑NA es DNo DNA .dyes DNo DNA
shutdown?* / - / -
Was fail-safe verified to be
o erational7' ;9-Yes DNo DNA A-Yes D No DNA #Yes C No DNA ft�*es DNo DNA
Wait time between applying
pressurelvacuum/water and staring
test: 3c, ��rN C) ,,J rn�,� ml:
Test Start Tune: /V•' / A /0'5_561 A 9:' A .
A 91 A 9.
Initial Reading(R,): Y,`l!r y 3.970 974P LA 8 0
Test End Time: !! 1D l l A �} 9:HN /U:u ?..H AA R 1/04:23&
Final Reading(Rr): y-`ill 14 r 3 Q 71,o 3..97(0 4 B(Pg bB A�q 9
Test Duration: / r-1 15 mrj K, enr I
Change in Reading(RF-Ro: CXx) 0,601 O- 000 0 Qpl 0.600 UGI
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0. 0. � O vU� (�, O,00? U•!�
Test Result: Pass 0 Fail Pass 0 Fail Pass 0 Fail ass D Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? -Ycs DNo DNA es ONo DNA. es DNo DNA 10Yes 0 N 0 N
Was sensor properly replaced and yes DNo O NA O-ves 0 No ❑NA Yes 0 No 0 NA -Yes 0 No DNA
verified functional after testing? .� /- -
COMMentS—(include tnformarion an repairs made prior ro testing and recommendedfollow-up forfailed tests)
`If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested. if the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(")is"NO"or"NA",the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
SWRCB,January 2002 Page of
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT UDC TESTING
Test Method Developed By: D UDC Manufacturer Ba Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
0 Other(Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum f9 Hydrostatic
G Other(Spec)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: .000in.
UDC# UDC# UDC# UDC#
UDC Manufacturer, n1k.N ^t"
UDC Material: S F2 I LAS
UDC Depth: z 4 $1 _
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration: G)
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to
testing: GL O—ArJ CLA,k J L-6 JQ
Portion of UDC Tested'
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid(both J�fes DNo DNA jiffies DNo [INA Yes DNo 0 N ;6-Yes ONo DNA
product and water)?'
Turbine shutdown response time er
is system programmed for fail.
safe shutdown?� Yes DNo DNA f-1'es DNo DNA $-Yes 0 N DNA ;&Yes 0 N 0 N
Was fail-safe verified to be es ❑No D NA es D No 0 NA es ❑No D NA $Yes ❑No ❑NA
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 2�,
starting test L2x) fYIT,-S ,hT rf +ML rl &0 fY�s nI
Test Start Time: -"/ � 9 %4 ti -v0 %
Initial Readin R : 4 13 L 3 S
Test End Time ,S e F? 5Lp 1410
Final Reading RF):
Test Duration: r r- lht M.Zrj
-Chang in Reading(R,-Rr): 0.001 a•vc_41 a.oU a 0•Ctrs O. Uud b•cx>t O.M •00
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.o C)9 cno p O.peg vo a In.0c,2�
Test Result: Pass D Fail $Pass ❑Fail ass 0 Fail Pass ❑Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes D No ❑NA Ayes 0 N DNA es ❑No DNA es ❑No DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and �A Yes ❑No DNA jKYes DNo DNA Yes ❑No DNA t'es 0 No 0 NA
verified functional after testin ? T`
Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommendedfollow-up for failed tests)
If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested,specify how much was tested. If the answer to gM of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(•)is"NO"or"NA",the entire UDC must be tested, (See SWRCB LG-160)
S W RCB,January 2002 Page 7—of
8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps 0
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested 0
Test Method Developed By: 0 Sump Manufacturer 18Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other(Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum 9 Hydrostatic
0 Other(Spec)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS-STS Equipment Resolution: .000in.
Fill Sump# FIII Sum # Fill Sump# Fill Sum q E
Sump Diameter: I
Sump Depth:_ X r
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Hi lest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest _
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to
testing: LC 1_A t`t' C.lrcp " CA til C
Portion of Sump Tested / r l i /'I=nl ILI roj
Sump Material: FS i ,4&1- -1.. "( -I A
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
-starting test: <30 (Y\T- mr,-, 0 M•C/J
'rest Start Time: ,ay P / :L4 law P I.,;)a VA9 P 9 P
Initial Readin ,): 5 3.9 P31 3. a 3. .'37(o ' S. 74
Test End Time: Jal; !° P 4162e V 64 P 1 P
Final Reading(R 5 a?
Test Duration:
Change in Reading R R,): OCA 0-ool ,C)OO acx)l o O.UOI .0 1
Pass/FaU Tlueshold or Criteria: �, vp a.00 GG 7,h I r),09 a (3-00 O.00
Test Result: 0 Fail ass 0 Fail ass 0 Fail jir-Pass 0 Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? 94es ONO es 0 No es 0 No 901es 0 No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is Yes 0 No 0 NA OYes 0 No 0 NA )es 0 No 0 NA 4it.Yes ❑No 17 NA
detected?
Was sensor removed for testing? es ❑No ❑NA es ❑No 0 NA es O No 0 NA Yes ❑No ❑NA
Was sensor properly replaced and es 0 No 0 NA 0 N 0 N es 0 N 0 N $Xes 0 N r,NA
verified functional after testing?
Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
S WRCB,January 2002
9. SPILLlOVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present,but were Not Tested 0
Test Method Developed By 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer 2 Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other(Spec)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum N Hydrostatic
O Other(Sped y)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS—STS Equipment Resolution: .000in.
f`+ Spill Box# 87,, Spill Box# v Spilt Box#q I U Spill Box h
Bucket Diameter: a Z•rl � Ssa DT
Bucket Depth: Z►`S 1 znl LO TJd
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test: 3O f Y,-x+J So f'(\T rJ 3o rr'c�r-)
Test Stan Time: 1a:a4 P / •`3 e la: j1,)-3p /:;Lp p I m. P
Initial Reading(Rj): 6.q09 •ulV g 6:7 q q 16.7q Ll 0 Wk-7
Test End Time: e l�)/5 P 1 Q I° / e Q
Final Reading(RF): to'&J b.LJ09 .'7N (p•7 foU 6-0.;7
Test Duration: .5 rN i-tJ / T t•i
Change in Reading(RF-R[): 0,piti:_1 I Q.f� -000 0•C�o
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: O.ex •a0a 0.00'A .Uj G•LX) O-CX�7
Test Result: Zfass 0 Fail Wass 0 Fail ass 0 Fail D Pass 0 Fail
Comments—(include Informatlon on repalrs made prior to testing;and recommendedfollow-up forjailed Jests)
G;HLL.L STATION
3698 'MINE AVE
BAKERSFIELD
SHELL STATION 11/02/2009 11:1? AM
3698 MING AVE SHELL STATION
BAKERSFIELD SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 3698 MING AUE
BAKERSFIELD
11/02/2009 9:44 AM 87 STP 11/02/2009 12:43 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT TEST STARTED 10:55 AM
DSL STP TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
BEGIN LEVEL 4.4113 IN
TEST STARTED 9:29 AM END TIME 11:10 AM 87 FILL
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 END DATE 11/02/2009 TEST STARTED 12:24 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 3.0924 IN END LEVEL 4,4110 IN TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
END TIME 9:44 AM LEAK THRESHOLD 0.092 IN BEGIN LEVEL 6.5856 IN
END DATE 11/02/2009 TEST RESULT PASSED END TIME 12:39 PM
END LEVEL 3.0937 IN END DATE 11/02/2809
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 6.5863 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED 89 STP LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST STARTED 10:55 AM TEST RESULT PASSED
91 STP TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
BEGIN LEVEL 3.9766 IN 89 FILL
TEST STARTED 9:29 AM END TIME_ 11 10 AM
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 END STATE 11/02/2099 TEST STARTED 12:24 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 4.8691 IN END LEVEL 3.9764 IN TEST STARTED 11/82/2009
END TIME 9:44 AM LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN BEGIN LEVEL 3.9232 IN
END DATE 11/02/2609 TEST RESULT PASSED END TIME 12:39 PM
END LEVEL_ 4.8685 IN END DATE 11/02/2809
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 3.9228 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
_. .__ __ ---------�----- 87 UPR
TEST STARTED 12:24 PM
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
BEGIN LEVEL 6.4099 IN
END-TIME 12:39 PM
END DATE 11/02/2089'
SHELL STATION END LEVEL 6.4089 IN
3698 MING, AUE LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
SHELL STATION BAKERSFIELD TEST RESULT PASSED
3698 MING AVE 11/02/2009 11:35 AM
BAKERSFIELD 89 UPR
SjJMP j_EAK TEST REPORT
11/02/2009 10:03 AM TEST STARTED L'?:24 PM
87 STP TEST STARTED 1.:/02/2009
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT BEGIN LEVEL 6.7440 IN
TEST STARTED 11:12 END TIME 12:39 PM
DSL STP TEST STARTED 11/02/2090 9 END DATE 11/02/2009
GIN LEVEL 4.4109 IN END LEVEL 6.7433 IN
TEST STARTED 02/ AM D TIME 11'27 API LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST STARTED 11/0955 IN END DATE 11/02/2009 TEST RESLU_T PASSED
BEGIN LEVEL 3.0955 IN END LEVEL 4.4112 IN
END TIME 10:03 AM LEAK THRE-LLD 0.002 IN
END DATE 11/02/2009 TEST RESULT PASSED
END LEVEL 3.0956 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED 89 STP
TEST STARTED 11:12 AM
91 STP TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
BEGIN LEVEL 3.9763 IN
TEST STARTED 9:48 AM TIME 11:27 AM
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 END DATE 11/0209
BEGIN LEVEL 4.8684 IN END LEVEL 3,9765 IN
END TIME 10:03 AM THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
LEAK
END DATE 11/02/2009 TEST THRE RESULT
END LEVEL 4.8682 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
SHELL, STATION SHELL STATION
SHELL STATION 3698 MING AVE 3698 MING AVE
3698 MING AVE BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD
BAKERSFIELD
11/02/2009 1:38 PM 11/02/2009 1:54 PM
11/02/2009 12:59 PM
TEST REPORT
SUMP LEAK SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
91 FILL 91 FILL
87 FILL
TEST STARTED 1;22 PM TEST STARTED 1:39 PM
TEST STARTED 12:43 PM TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009. BEGIN LEVEL 3.9753 IN BEGIN LEVEL 3.9763 IN
BEGIN LEVEL 6.5862 IN END TIME END TIME 1:54 PM
11/02/28
END TIME 12:58 PM END DATE 1:38 IN PM END DATE 11/02/2809
END LEVEL 3.9766 IN
END DATE 11/02/2089 END LEVEL 3.9762 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 8.802 IN
END LEVEL 6.5863 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.082 IN TEST RESULT PASSED
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSLFILL DSLFILL
89 FILL
TEST STARTED 1:22 PM TEST STARTED 1:39 PM
TEST STARTED 12:43 PM TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 TEST STARTED 11/02z2009
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 BEGIN LEVEL 5.4784 IN BEGIN LEVEL 5.4794 IN
BEGIN LEVEL 3.9229 IN END TIME 1:38 PM END TIME 1:54 PM
END TIME 12:58 PM END DATE 11/02/2009 END DATE 11/02/2009
END DATE 11/02/2009 END LEVEL 5.4795 IN END LEVEL 5.4800 IN
END LEUEL 3.9229 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST RESULT PASSED
91VPR 91VPR
87 VPk TEST STARTED 1:22 PM TEST STARTED 1:39 PM
TEST STARTED 12:43 PM TEST STARTED 11/82/2009 TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 BEGIN LEVEL 6.0278 IN BEGIN LEVEL 6.0277 IN
BEGIN LEVEL 6.4888 IN END TIME 1:38 PM END TIME 1:54 PM
END TIME 12:58 PM END DATE 11/02/2009 END DATE 11/02/2069
END DATE 11/02/2009 END LEVEL 6.0277 IN END LEVEL 6.0274 IN
END LEVEL 6.4090 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 8.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST RESULT PASSED
89 VPR
TEST STARTED 12:43 PPi
TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
BEGIN LEVEL 6.7440 IN
END TIME 12:58 PM
END DATE 11/02/2009
END LEVEL 6.7433 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.802 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
3-4
SHELL STATION TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED 3:19 PM
3698 MING AVE `! 11/02/2009
BAKERSFIELD SHELL STATION BEGIN LEVEL 3,2354 IN
3598 MING AVE END TIME 3,34 PM
11/02/2-009 i t3AKERSFIELD tf END DATE 11/02/2009
2:56 PM END LEVEL 3,2339 IN
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 11/02/2009 3:16 PM :%:'' TEST THRESHOLD 0,902 IN
j`: RESULT
1-2 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT PASSED
TEST STARTED 1-2
TEST STARTED 11/2.41 PM <`
BEGIN LEVEL 02/2009 TEST STARTED 3:00 PM
END TIME 4'2865 IN TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
END DATE 2:56 PM f"�
;�4; BEGIN LEVEL 4.2853 IN `
END LEVEL 11/02/2009 r};yi END TIME 3:15 PM 7-8
LEAK THRESHOLD 6.002 IN ?'"' END DATE 11/02/2009
TEST RESULT h` END LEVEL 4.2835 IN TEST STARTED 3:19 PM
PASSED ' LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN r TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
%`. TEST RESULT PASSED ' BEGIN LEVEL 3.2545 IN
v ys END TIME
3.34 PM
END DATE 11/02/2009
1° . 3-4 f %�. END LEVEL 3.2539 IN
r� LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
5-6 r, ' TEST STARTED 3:00 PM Y= TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST STARTED TEST STARTED 11/02/2009 fir
TEST STARTED 11/022069 BEGIN LEVEL 3.2382 IN1
l
.BEGIN LEVEL 3,9538 IN ,% END TIME 3:15 PM
END TIME 2:56 PM END DATE 11/02/2009
END DATE 11/02/2009 END LEVEL 3.2364 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
END LEVEL 3.9537 IN /=,�'�
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST RESULT PASSED
5-6
TEST STARTED 3:00 PM
TEST STARTED TEST STARTED 11/02/2009
TEST STARTED 2'41 PMT BEGIN LEVEL 3.9538 IN
11/02/2009 END TIME 3:15 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 3.3174 IN T;r� END DATE 11/02/2009
END TIME 2:56 PM END LEVEL 3.9525 IN
/02/2
END DATE ''"
11 009 %"
END LEVEL + LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 -IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 3.3163 IN TEST RESULT PASSED
0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
i
L7
SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT
SITE NAME• tTpTLo3 hI DATE:
ADDRESS• 'Mm mzz-3LQ TE'CHNICIAN:�/�rIJ1�cy/J
SIGNATURE:
SITE CONTACT:
THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED/REPAIRED TO COMPLETE THE SB989
TESTING.
LIST OF PARTS REPLACED/REPAIRED
REPAIRS: WE
LABOR: A-to L�.
PARTS INSTALLED: 1\-bf