The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutORD NO 4723ORDINANCE NO. 4 72 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT FROM E (ESTATE) ON 12.45 ACRES AND R -1 -CH (ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH CHURCH OVERLAY) ON 7.96 ACRES TO R -2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING) ON APPROXIMATELY 20.41 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROSEDALE HWY, 660 FEET WEST OF ALLEN ROAD, (GPA /ZC NO. 12- 0372). WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associates for Black Ops Real Estate, LLC, filed an application with the City of Bakersfield Community Development Department requesting to change the zone district from E (Estate) on 12.45 acres and R -1 -CH (One Family Dwelling with Church Overlay) on 7.96 acres to R -2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) located on the north side of Rosedale Hwy, 660 feet west of Allen Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission modified the proposed project and recommended to City Council to change the zone district from E (Estate) on 12.45 acres and R -1 -CH (One Family Dwelling with Church Overlay) on 7.96 acres to R -2 /PUD (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling /Planned Unit Development) located on the north side of Rosedale Hwy, 660 feet west of Allen Road (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 20, 2012, and approved Resolution No. 44 -12, which recommended that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration and approve the Project as modified; and WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the Project was submitted by Philippe Heglin, neighboring resident; and Jonathan and Angela Geersen, neighboring residents; and WHEREAS, a second appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require a PUD (Planned Unit Development) overlay on the proposed zoning, was submitted by Roger A. McIntosh of McIntosh and Associates, representative of the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered all facts, testimony and evidence concerning the Project, including the staff report, initial study, special studies, deliberation and action by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. SECTION 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows: 1. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 44 -12 are hereby adopted. 2. The Negative Declaration is hereby adopted. L- m r- Ci ORIGINAL 3. The appeals concerning the Planning Commissions' decision to approve the project is hereby denied. 4. The appeal concerning the Planning Commissions' decision to require a PUD overlay zone is hereby upheld. 5. The change to the zone district is hereby approved subject to the mitigation measures /conditions of approval in Exhibit A, and incorporating the change into the official zoning map as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020 as shown in Exhibit B and as specifically described in Exhibit C. SECTION 2. This ordinance must be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and will become effective not less than 30 days from and after the date of its passage. .0. -2 - o� e AKF9� F -- m V r i> ORICIINAL HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on MAR 10 2013 by the following vote: A NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: APPROVED COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER, COUNCILMEMBER, COUNCILMEMBER. MAR 2 0 2013 HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfi APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attor ey By: ANDREW HEGLUND Deputy City Attorney ,% ✓ ,/ ✓ ✓ MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, JOHNSON ,(\0,(\ J2' - ROBERTA GAFFORD, CM CITY CLERK and Ex Offi io Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures /Conditions of Approval B Zone Change Map C Legal Description CG\ S: \GPAs \GPA 4th 2012\ 1 2-0372\Reso Ord \CC ZC Ordinance.doc ' gAKF99 T _ m ':ORIGINAL Exhibit A Mitigation Measures /Conditions of Approval o �~ rn r- ORIGINAL Exhibit A Mitigation Measures & Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment /Zone Change No. 12 -0372 MITIGATION MEASURES FROM NEGATIVE DECLARATION: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project will have air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction and use of the project site. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they will /have met all air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Mitigation for Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas impacts. Biological Impact Mitigation Measures 2. The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 -711). The META makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires that project - related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle (March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and /or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and /or imprisonment. Mitigation for biological impacts. 3. Prior to ground disturbance, the developer shall have a qualified consultant survey the location for kit fox, and comply with the provisions of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan. Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the State Department of Fish and Game. Developer shall be subject to the mitigation measures recommended by the consultant. A copy of the survey shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to ground disturbance. The current MBHCP expires in year 2014. Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit and pay fees prior to the 2014 expiration date under the current MBHCP. As determined by the City of Bakersfield, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval or building permit) before the 2014 expiration date will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP. Early payment or pre - payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP. Urban development permits issued after the 2014 expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and the California Fish and Game Department. Mitigation for biological impacts. A K6- 1- Fr r -- O Page 1 of 5 OPHUNAL EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures & Conditions of Approval GPA /ZC No. 12 -0372 Cultural Imcact Mitigation Measures 4. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work would cease pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resource Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately. Mitigation for cultural impacts. 5. Prior to ground- disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associates with the grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and archaeological resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, etc.) that may be encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify those resources in the field, and of the regulatory protections afforded to those resources. The personnel shall be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of archaeological remains during grading activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological finds with equipment and not collect artifacts. The applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they have met this requirement prior to commencement of ground- disturbance activities. This documentation should include information on the date(s) of training activities, the individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of the training, and a list of names of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, the on -site supervisor shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist. Mitigation for cultural impacts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Public Works 6. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement plans, or with the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following shall occur (If a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPA /ZC area is submitted, than these conditions can be met with the map, otherwise they are to be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for either a Lot Line Adjustment or Parcel Merger): a. Provide fully executed dedication for Allen Road to arterial standards from the north boundary of Tract 3825 along the full frontage of the parcel to the north of Tract 3825, APN 464 - 031 -21, to the south boundary of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6052. Dedications shall include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the dedication documents. Provide an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication to Caltrans standard for SR 58, Rosedale Highway. The right of way to be dedicated, in a format approved by the state, before any state encroachment permit is issued. b. Submit updated drainage study to the City Engineer of the existing drainage system's capability to accept the additional run off to be generated through development under the new land use and zoning. Page 2 of 5 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures & Conditions of Approval GPA /ZC No. 12 -0372 c. Submit verification to the City Engineer of the existing sewer system's capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through development under the new land use and zoning. d. Developer is responsible for the construction of all infrastructure, (completed, in- complete and new) both public and private, within the boundary of the GPA /ZC area. This includes the construction of any and all boundary streets to the centerline of the street, unless otherwise specified. The developer is also responsible for the construction of any off site infrastructure required to support this development, as identified in these conditions. The phasing of the construction, all infrastructure will be addressed at a subdivision map or site plan review stage. Construct the following specific street improvements to city standards: i. Full width local street for the connecting street from GPA /ZC area to Allen Road and construct a wall at the south end of Phairfield Street with a locked gate to provide access for the sump. ii. Allen Road half width from the Northwest return at Van Buren Place to the south boundary of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6052. Improvements in the county are to be approved and permitted thru the county. iii. SR 58, Rosedale Highway, is to be constructed to Caltrans standards along the full frontage of the GPA /ZC area. An encroachment permit issued in accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 671.5 shall be obtained from Caltrans for all placements of encroachments within, under or over State right of way. Encroachments are subject to removal by the Department in accordance with Section s673 and 720 of the Streets and Highways Code. Encroachment permits do not run with the land. A change of ownership requires a new permit application. The proposed access on SR 58 would be limited to right in and right out only. Extension of existing curbed median would be required to restrict left turn movements. For orderly development. 7. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidated Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment or Parcel Merger for any portion of this GPA area. If the parcel is already within a consolidated maintenance district, the owner shall update the maintenance district documents, including the Proposition 218 ballot and the Covenant. The ballot and covenant shall be signed and notarized. For orderly development. 8. Access to the arterial streets will be limited and determined at the time of division or development. Determination of whether a right turn lane is required at the access street(s) will also be made at the time of division or development. A full access opening will only be considered if the developer funds and installs a traffic signal at the site entrance. Said signal will only be permitted if a signal synchronization study is submitted and approved, which shows progression is not adversely affected. For orderly development. L � F- m r- Page 3 of 5 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures & Conditions of Approval GPA /ZC No. 12 -0372 9. Provide waiver of direct access and complete 6' concrete block wall (if needed) per city standards along the south right of way line of the connecting street to Allen Road from the east boundary the GPA /ZC area to Allen Road. For orderly development. 10. A traffic impact analysis dated September 21, 2012 was prepared by McIntosh & Associates for the project site. There is a 25 peak trip increase compared to the existing use for the property. This increase is less than the 50 peak hour trips that would trigger the need for a traffic study per Section 6.2.1 of the Subdivision Design Manual due to its minimal impact. We recommend that the development be required to pay into the adopted Regional Traffic Impact Fee fixed rate program. Mitigation for Traffic Impacts. Planning 11. Prior to recordation of the final map(s) for the subject property, the subdivider /applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee based on a park land dedication requirement of 2.5 acres per 1000 population in accordance with Chapter 15.80 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, based on the dwelling units approved by this General Plan Amendment. However, if the number of dwelling units increases or decreases upon recordation of a final map(s), the park land requirement will proportionately change accordingly. For impacts to Recreation and Park services. 12. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment and Zone Change area shall not exceed 200 dwelling units. For orderly development. 13. Any building constructed along the north side of Alyssa Marie Avenue (TTM 6921) shall not exceed one -story. For orderly development. Parks 14. Developer /applicant shall, at the time of issuance of a building permit, pay all development fees at the rate in effect at time of the vesting of the map for the type of dwelling units subject to the permit. For orderly development. NOR Parks 15. Prior to recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall provide the Planning Department written proof /verification from North of the River Recreation and Park District that said project is within the NOR Park Maintenance District. For orderly development. Page 4 of 5 r -- m c� f_ C� ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures & Conditions of Approval GPA /ZC No. 12 -0372 16. Prior to recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall contact North of the River Recreation and Park District. It is recommended the subdivider contact the District at least 2 or 3 months prior to the expected date of recordation. For orderly development. City Aftorne 17. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and /or property owner and /or subdivider ( "Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners and boards ( "City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for City's sole active negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued. The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, falling under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party. CG: S: \GPAs \GPA 4th 2012\ 1 2-0372\Conditions Ex A.docx 04 A K, 9q Page 5 of 5 COHIGINik, Exhibit B Zone Change Location Map OAKF- v ORIGINAL a ti� w C a 2 U a m a w w a w z a 2 a (n ac 0 AVM 83HV{ � cc 0 U a 0 U N S Z N L! C6 N F-- 0 LU LLJ o cc IS H011H308-4 w w ¢ 0 z cc a z z I LU ad N311V [[ a a N a F � � ¢ rt a � a= U U � M O z z J a W i T w N � c� is aoeava�da311 Z U G Q 2 w ]13 U W1S O131daIVHd g Z U (D ° ¢ O cr W a N LLJ ¢ a Lq z w o a ti� w C a 2 U a m a w w a w z a 2 a (n ac 0 AVM 83HV{ � cc 0 U a 0 U N S Z N L! C6 N F-- 0 LU LLJ o cc IS H011H308-4 w w ¢ 0 z cc a z z I ORIGINAL �. [[ a � U � W i ................ .! 9s N � � _ T m r U G ORIGINAL Exhibit C Zone Change Legal Description t-- fti �3 f- J ORIGINAL GPA AND ZONE CHANGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA NO 1- PROPOSED R -2 (FROM R -1 CH) AND HMR (FROM LR) BEING A PORTION OF LOT 31 ACCORDING TO THE SALES MAP OF LANDS OF J.B. HAGGIN FILED JULY 17, 1890, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER LOCATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ROSEDALE HIGHWAY (STATE ROUTE VI- KER -58); THENCE SOUTH 89 °36'34" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION AND SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 661.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 31 OF SAID SALES MAP; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'16" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, A DISTANCE OF 41.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF ROSEDALE HIGHWAY PER THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED IN FAVOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED MAY 16, 1968 IN BOOK 4161, PAGE 266, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7480.00 FEET, FROM WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 03 °14'25" WEST; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 °50'59 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 372.02 FEET; THENCE 2) SOUTH 00 °23'26" EAST, RADIAL TO LAST MENTIONED CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF ROSEDALE HIGHWAY PER SAID SALES MAP; THENCE 3) SOUTH 89 °36'34" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 289.43 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31; THENCE 4) NORTH 00 °19'11" WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 527.22 FEET; THENCE 5) DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 89 °36'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 661.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 31 OF SAID SALES MAP; THENCE 6) SOUTH 00 °19'16" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 515.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7.96 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AREA NO 2 PROPOSED R -2 (FROM E) AND HMR (FROM SR) BEING A PORTION OF LOT 31 ACCORDING TO THE SALES MAP OF LANDS OF J.B. HAGGIN FILED JULY 17, 1890, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER LOCATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ROSEDALE HIGHWAY (STATE ROUTE VI- KER -58); THENCE SOUTH 89 036'34" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION AND SAID CENTERLINE, A ��AKF9 O cP� O r— ORIGINAL GPA AND ZONE CHANGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) DISTANCE OF 661.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 31 OF SAID SALES MAP; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'16" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, A DISTANCE OF 557.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1) DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 89 °36'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 661.28 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 31; THENCE 2) NORTH 00 °19'11" WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 760.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 31; THENCE 3) NORTH 89. 37'11" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, A DISTANCE OF 661.26 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 31; THENCE 4) SOUTH 00 °19'16" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, A DISTANCE OF 760.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 11.54 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AREA NO 3 PROPOSED R -2 (FROM E) AND HMR (FROM LMR) BEING LOT 18 OF TRACT NO. 3825 FILED FOR RECORD MAY 31, 1977 IN MAP BOOK 27 AT PAGES 57 AND 58, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER LOCATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THE SOUTHEASTERLY 20.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND COINCIDENT WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID TRACT NO. 3825. CONTAINING 39,892 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. �.tA -t3 Jq IN DATE L. EXPIRES 6 -30 -14 MCINTOSH , Associam JA 661 - 834 -4814 - 661 - 834 -0972 2001 Wheelan Court - Bakersfield, CA 93309 p LAND S& 1. JEFFREY L MARTIN c E--XP iO.14 1 \ LS 5798 _ � gAxFq P: \PROJECTS\ 12033. 01 - Rosedale \Legals \12033.01GPA- ZCO1.docx O a � ~ T U r_ �7 0RIG1JN,C „_ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. County of Kern ) ROBERTA GAFFORD, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; and that on the 22th day of March, 2013 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Ordinance No. 4723, passed by the Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 20th day of March. 2013 and entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT FROM E (ESTATE) ON 12.45 ACRES AND R -1 -CH (ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH CHURCH OVERLAY) ON 7.96 ACRES TO R -2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING) ON APPROXIMATELY 20.41 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROSEDALE HWY, 660 FEET WEST OF ALLEN ROAD, (GPA/ZC NO. 12- 0372). ROBERTA GAFFORD City Clerk and Ex Officio of the Council of the City of Bakersfield By: 'l�"✓ DEPUTY City Clerk SADOCUMEN'r\FORMSWOP.ORD.wpd