HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB-989 RESULTS 7-8-13 #721SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors pe1jorming periodic testing of UST second01y containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and
printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: #7721 Fastrip # 22 (North) I Date of Testing: May 7-8,2013
Facility Address: 4013 South-H-Street Bakersfield, CA 93304
Facility Contact: Omero Garcia I Phone: 661-393-7000
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/1/2013
Name of Local Agency Inspector {if present during testing): Esther Duran
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Technician Conducting Test:
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: CSLB I License Number:804904
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires
UST 11 /22/2013
lnstallaton/Retrofi t
UST Service ICC 1-28-201 5
technician
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A.
3 SUMMARYOF TESTRESULTS .
Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs
Tested Made Tested Made
87 Annular X 0 0 0 UDC 15-16 X 0 . ' X
91 Annular X 0 0 0 UDC 17-18 X 0 [J 0
Diesel Annular X 0 0 0 UDC 19-20 X 0 0 0
87 Secondary Line X 0 J 0 87 Vapor Spill Bucket X 0 [] 0
91 Secondary Line X 0 0 0 91 Vapor Spill Bucket X 0 0 0
Diesel Annular Line X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0
87 STP Sump X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0
91 STP Sump X r-, :::J 0 0 ..., ., 0 LJ LJ LJ
Diesel STP Sump X 0 0 0 0 " [ 0 w
UDC 9-10 X 0 n 0 0 0 0 0
UDC 11-12 X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0
UDC 13-14 X '] 0 I] ;] 0 0 0
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum
ESP NSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To tlte best of my knowledge, tt are accurate and in full compliance wit It legal requirements
Technician's Signature:._-/-#~~'R"~;__.:.:J..-''--,L-J~~f--------'D=at=e::....=.;05=/=07.,_--=-0=8/-=2-=-0"'-"-13
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
4 TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: 0 Tank Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
0 Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure x Vacuum D Hydrostatic
[ Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Tank# 87 Tank# 91 Tank # Diesel Tank#
Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes X No D Yes X No '-'Yes X No D Yes 'J No
Tank Capacity: 12,000 12.000 12,000
Tank Material: STEELIFRP STEEL/ FRP STEEL/ FRP
Tank Manufacturer: Modern Welding Modern Welding Modern Welding
Product Stored: 87 Annular 91 Annular Diesel Annular
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Mins 5 Mins 5 Mins
starting test:
Test Start Time: 9:45am 9:45am 9:45am
Initial Reading (R1): -10.00" Hg -10.00" Hg -10.00" Hg
Test End Time: 10:45 am 10:45 am 10:45 am
Final Reading (RF): -10.00" Hg -10.00" Hg -10.00" Hg
Test Duration: I Hour I Hour I Hour
Change in Reading (Rr-R1): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass O Fail X Pass D Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No D NA X Yes D No D NA X Yes :=:No NA DYes DNo DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes D No D NA X Yes D No U NA X Yes ~No NA DYes J No 'lNA verified functional afier testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.follow-upfor.failed tests)
Single Wall Tanks
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)}
I
SWRCB. January 2002 Page _of __
5 SECONDARY PIPE TESTING .
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard C1 Professional Engineer
[]Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 llydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run # 87 Piping Run # 91 Piping R un # Diesel Piping Run #
Piping Material: FRP FRP FRP
Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith
Piping Diameter: 3.00'" 3.00" 3.00"
Length of Piping Run: 120' 120' 120'
Product Stored: 87 Secondary 9 1 Secondary Diesel Secondary
Method and location of Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot piping-run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
starting test:
Test Start Time: 10:30 am 10:30 am 10:30 am
Initial Reading (R1): 5.00"PSJ 5.00"PSI 5.00"PSI
Test End Time: 11:30 am I 1:30am 11:30 am
Final Reading (RF): 5.00"PSI 5.00"PSI 5.00"PSI
Test Duration: I Hour I Hour I Hour
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass O Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass O Fail
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up[or f ailed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page _of __
6 PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer x industry Standard [] Professional Engineer
D Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: f) Pressure "Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
·-
Sump# 87 Sump # 91 Sump # Diesel Sump #
Sump Diameter: 37.00" 37.00" 37.00"
Sump Depth: 47.00" 47.00" 47.00"
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP
Height from Tank Top to Top of 10.00" 14.00" 13.00" Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest 10.00" 15.00" 15.00" Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry
Portion of Sump Tested 1 High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?'
U Yes DNo XNA D Yes D NoX NA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes l No DNA
Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A N/A
Is system programmed for fail-safe
shutdown?' 'l Yes ~No XNA 0 Yes D NoXNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes No DNA
Was fail-safe verified to be r Yes ";No XNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes D NoXNA 0 Yes ['No D NA operational?'
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting 5Min 5Min 5Min
test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1):
Test End Time: ~--INC ON
Final Reading (RF): DftC!!Itl~ 'Ill:!!:
Test Duration:
. , ___ . ·-
Change in Reading (Rp-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass D Fail X Pass D Fail X Pass D Fail D Pass D FaiJ
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No D NA X Yes D No D NA X Yes D No [I NA D Yes D No u NA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes D No D NA X Yes D No [I NA X Yes D No CJ NA D Yes D No D NA verified functional after testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfol/ow-up[or failed tests)
1 If the entire depth ofthe sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to ill:!Y of the questions indicated with an
asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page _ of
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT(UOC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: [J UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard U Professional Engineer
[J Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: U Pressure 0 Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
UDC # 9-10 UDC # 11 -12 UDC # 13-14 UDC # 15-16
UDC Manufacturer: Gil barco Gilbarco Gil barco Gil barco
UDC Material: Polly Polly Polly Polly
UDC Depth: 29.00" 29.00'' 29.00" 29.00"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top 12.00" 10.00" 10.00" 10.75"
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to 4.00" 4.00" 4.00" 4.00"
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of U DC prior to Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry
testing:
Portion ofUDC Tested1 High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both 0 Yes O No XNA ..... Yes O NoXNA ;::; Yes 2 No XNA C Yes U No XNA
product and water)?'
Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A N/A N/A
Is system programmed for fail-[]Yes O No XNA Yes D NoX NA D Yes O No XNA 0 Yes L'No XNA safe shutdown?'
Was fail-safe verified to be Yes D No XNA Yes =NoXNA Yes ':No XNA D Yes ~No XNA operational?'
Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1): ~ ........ IN ~ON
Test End Time: ~ .....
Final Reading (Rr): nc~:n ,.,.,
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (Rr-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass O Fail X Pass D Fail X Pass O Fail X Pass O Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No D NA X Yes ::::::No 'l NA X Yes ;:J No U NA X Yes u No 'J NA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes ...... No C NA XYes O No u NA XYes D No NA XYes D No C NA I verified functional after testing?
Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.follow-up.for.failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to ill1Y of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure C Vacuum x llydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
UDC # 17-18 UDC # 19=20 UDC # UDC #
UDC Manufacturer: Gil barco Gil barco
UDC Material: Polly Polly
UDC Depth: 29.00'" 29.00"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top 12.00" 12.00"
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to 6.00" 6.00"
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition ofUDC prior to Clean & Dry Clean & Dry
testing:
Portion ofUDC Tested' High Penetration High Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?'
[]Yes DNo XNA 1 Yes D NoXNA DYes DNo DNA DYes UNo UNA
Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A
Is system programmed for fa il-
safe shutdown?' [)Yes DNo XNA C.. Yes D No XNA DYes CNo NA DYes 1No DNA
Was fail-safe verified to be Yes DNo XNA ._.Yes DNoXNA DYes ,..,No NA DYes No .,NA operational?'
Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1): ~,..,.. II ,tf'nM
Test End Time: ---. .., __ ....
Final Reading (RF): Kes uns
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-R!):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass D Fail X Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes DNo D NA X Yes DNo DNA DYes ~No NA DYes DNo :::JNA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes r No DNA X Yes D No [] NA DYes ,..,No NA DYes .J No ~NA verified functional after testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.follow-up[or.fai/ed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to ill!Y of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
I
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
8 FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps D
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested X
Test Method Developed By: 0 Sump Manufacturer ::::: Industry Standard .J Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: [] Pressure D Vacuum D llydrostatic
[]Other (SpecifY)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump #
Sump Diameter:
Sump Depth:
!Ieight from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to
testing:
Portion of Sump Tested
Sump Material:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? Yes D No :::::Yes D No DYes O No D Yes D No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is D Yes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo LJ NA DYes UNo DNA
detected?
Was sensor removed for testing? [J Yes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and Yes C No NA DYes DNo 'lNA DYes :::;No DNA DYes No DNA verified functional after testing?
Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up.forfailed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
9 SPILUOVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES .
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested 0
Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other {Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure '""'Vacuum x Hydrostatic
n Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
Spill Box# 87 Vapor Spill Box # 91 Vapor Spill Box# Spill Box #
Bucket Diameter: 12.00" 12.00"
Bucket Depth: 12.00" 12.00"
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Mins 5 Mins
starting test:
Test Start Time: 9:45am 9:45am
Initial Reading (R1): 10.25'. 11.00"
Test End Time: 10:45 am 10:45 am
Final Reading (Rr): 10.25" 11.00"
Test Duration: I Hour I Hour
Change in Reading (Rr-R1): 0.00" 0.00"
Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" 0.00" Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass O Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass O Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up[or failed tests)
~fiDE'+,
CJO ('~ ~UST¥
IS' +' )'lloc-t\0
"BUILD WITH CONFIDENCE"
Toll Free #: 1-800-339-9930 Date Call Made
Name Confidence UST Construction Inc.
Time
~ Street 16250 Meacham Road ~~~------------------------------------------~ ~ City Bakersfield,Ca 93314
Terms
Description of work performed:
Date
Quantity
.:1
\
\
Name I Number
AM PM
Contractor Supplied -Materials -Rentals
J: LJ: L\\~ .. Cj ~
WL.a_ s d( G..ftJ k~ I Jcf ,
(\A \_~('. PdLf--<s...
I
Labor
AM PM
I
Job Order I Invoice# oDIO ¥
To Whom Station Control Number
Amount
{q;<:X?
Sub-Total
Total A Labor
Hourly
Rate
Total B Material
Total C Mileage
Total Amount
Invoice A +B +C
lnvo1ce Date
Amount
Accounting Breakdown
Mileage
Miles Rate Total Sub Total
Handling __ %
Tax ( If applicable)
Total C Total B
May we please have your comments regarding service I equipment provided by the above named contractor:
Store Employee Pr,nted Name J
11
lj~'~ture J I -r~v ~~ I Date Approved By Date . .n 7'
Tf21 FASTRIP
4013 SOUTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
110·30708
05/08/2013 8: 16 Ali
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
19-20
TEST STARTED 8:01 AH
TEST STARTED 05/08/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3.3526 IN
ENO TIME 8:16 AH
END DATE 05/08/2013
ENO LEVEL 3.3519 IN
:tAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
1EST RESUlT PASSED
7721 FASTRIP
4013 SOOTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
ltD-30708
05/08/2013 8:32 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
19-20
TEST STARTED 8:17AM
TEST STARTED 05/08/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3.3516 IN
ENO TitlE 8:32 AM
END DATE 05/08/2013
E~'O LEVEL 3, 3517 IN
LEAK TH~ESHOtD 0. 002 HJ
TEST RESUlT PASSED
\
7721 FASTRIP
11013 SOUTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-3::l3-7000
110-30708
05/09/2013 8:J8 M
SLMP LEAK iEST REt't'RT
87-STP
TEST STARTED ~:33 AM
TESi STARTED 05/09/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3, 2130 IN
ENO TiME 8:Q8 AM
END DATE 05/09/2013
END LEVEL 3,2116 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 W
TEST RESULT PASSED
7721 tASTRIP
11013 SotJTH H
BmRSFiElD CA
661-393-7000
110-30708
05/09/2013 9:21AM
SU~P LEAK TEST REPOR1
87-STP
TEST STARTED 9:05 AM
TEST STARTED 05/09/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3, 2085 Ill
END TIME 9:20 A.'1
E~'O OATE 05/09/2013
EtJD LEvEL 3. 2069 IN
lEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 W
TEST RESULT PASSED
7721 FASTRIP
4013 SOUTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
110-30708
05/07/2013 10:5.) A1l
S!HiP LEAK TEST REPORT
DIE-STP
TEST STARTED 10:35 AN
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3, 7319 IN
END TIHE TO:So AM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END lEVEL 3, 7329 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 lN
TEST RESULT PASSEO
-sn
TE:'
Tt ·~u '/2013
BEG 'I; 72 It/
EtiD liME :50 AH
E~U GAIL v~, '2013
END LEVEL 2. 96 ·~ H.
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 W
TEST RESQ T PASSED
7721 FASTRIP
4013 SOUTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
110-30708
05/07/2013 11:06 AM
~1P LEAK TEST REPORT
DIE-STP
TEST STARTED 10:51 AM
TEST SiARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3. 7329 IN
END TIME 11:06 AM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END LEVEL 3, 733& IN
LEAK TH~ESHOLO 0, 00~ HI
TEST RESULT PASSED
91-STP
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME
ENO DATE
Et.O LEVEL
LEAK THRESJfl·
TEST RESU~T
10:51 AM
05/07/2013
2.9680 IN
11:06 AM
05/07/2013
~. ~se1 m
l
ASS:£J
FASTRJP
7721
BACKERSF!ELD
1-800-986-6266
05/10/2013 12:ll1 PM
SUHP LEAK TEST REPORT
lJOC1516
iEST STARTED 12:25 PM
iEST STARTED 05/10/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5,5195 HI
ENO TIME 12:61 PM
END DATE 05/10/2013
END LEVEL 5.5195 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 I~
TEST RESULT PASSED
FASTRJP
n21
BPO<ERSF IELO
1-soo-saa-6266
05/10/2013 12:56 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
IXJC1516
TEST STARTED 12:ll1 FN
TEST STARTED 05/10/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5.5195 IN
END TIME 12:56 PH
ENO DATE 05/10/2013
END LEVEL 5,5193 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 .IN
TEST RESUL I PASSECJ
..,{21 .:r-.
4t·' .,. ..
ACKr: •. T;: ~( 6h ->;• .-/IJi
! -800-:0.84-t
IJOC 171 s
EST STA~TEfo ;c;.: PM
TE~T STI'I~";O •3'
3EGIN LE1.1EL ~
'I"~)"";
L17 lt-1
:: '1"'1 r~10 T !ME
~D DATE
'hlr> LE1.JEl.
05.'l?,i.. "'
.AV THPESHOLD 0.~
T .• ~ Q.ESIJL T
4f' ~~'.:Kf e..;.-· -· -~ ... "
-~ ....
lJI.·,,_ 1 /1~:
i'l
{[()
7721 FASTRIP
4013 SOUTH H
BAJ(ERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
IID-30708
05!07/2013 1:a7 PH
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
9-10
TEST STARTED 1:32 PH
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 6.3827 IN
END TIME 1:47PM
EtiO DATE 05/07/2013
EtiO LEVEL 6, 3825 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
11-12
TEST STARTED 1:32PM
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 2.0300 IN
END TIME 1:a7 PM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END LEVEL 2.0290 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
13-lQ
TEST STARTED 1:32PM
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5,9276 IN
END TIHE 1:47 PM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END LEVEL 5,9274 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
7721 FASTRIP
4013 SOUTH H
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
110-30708
05/07/2013 2:03 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
9-10
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME
END DATE
EtlfJ LEVEL
l:Q8 PM
05/07/2013
6.3825 IN
2:03 PH
05/07/2013
6. 3823 Itl
0,002 IN
PASSED
!_EI;( THRESHOLD
7i:S1 RESULT
11-12
TEST STARTED 1:a8 PM
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 2,0291 IN
END TIME 2:03 PM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END LEVEL '2,0289 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
13-1Q
TEST STARTED 1:a8 PM
TEST STARTED 05/07/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5.9272 IN
END TIME 2:03 PM
END DATE 05/07/2013
END LEVEL 5,9270 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED